Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-13 Thread jfm
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I thought that Dan had fixed all those by changing the .info files to use here-doc format? Perhaps he only did the 10.3 tree? On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm pretty sure that's been fixed in all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3

[Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-12 Thread David R. Morrison
Following a suggestion on the fink-users list, the CVS version of fink will now only display the warnings about BuildDependsOnly if you set the verbosity level of fink to be higher than the default. All fink developers should do this, to avoid accidentally using a BuildDepends on an inappropriate

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
jfm wrote: Oh please Dave _ and give the same treatment to those WARNING: Deprecated multi-line format used for property ... that fill a terminal buffer at every fink index _ this perpetual reindexing is already a sufficient punishment w/o that !!! -) I thought that Dan had fixed all those by

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-12 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 jfm wrote: snop _ this perpetual reindexing is already a sufficient punishment w/o that !!! -) Could you please expand on that statement? Not because I want to sound snippy, but because I am interested. Of course it is our wish to have the