Am 08.01.2004 um 04:39 schrieb Daniel Macks:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote:
How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have
procmail call a script that updates your thing based on that? Given
that the messages are
At 14:41 +0100 8/1/04, Max Horn wrote:
Am 08.01.2004 um 04:39 schrieb Daniel Macks:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote:
How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have
procmail call a script that updates your thing based
Kevin Horton wrote:
Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good
part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to differentiate
items that are waiting for the submitter to respond from items that are
waiting for an official fink person to tend to. But, I
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Kevin Horton wrote:
Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good
part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to differentiate
items that are waiting for the submitter to respond from items
At 21:40 -0500 6/1/04, James Gibbs wrote:
I've had some packages in the tracker since Thanksgiving (that's
November for you non-Americans). I'd greatly appreciate it if
someone could take the time to pop them into cvs.
In particular, AdvanceMAME and AdvanceMenu are two awesome programs
that
On Jan 7, 2004, at 5:34 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
I have been a bit puzzled over where the package tracker fits in the
big scheme of things. There are obviously a lot of resources devoted
to improving the fink program itself, when from the average users
point of view it seems to work very
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:16:25PM -0500, James Gibbs wrote:
On Jan 7, 2004, at 5:34 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
I think the average user would hope for a continual stream of new
packages, which means you need people to keep feeding the package
tracker with new submissions. However, there
At 18:47 -0500 7/1/04, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:16:25PM -0500, James Gibbs wrote:
On Jan 7, 2004, at 5:34 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
I think the average user would hope for a continual stream of new
packages, which means you need people to keep feeding the package
tracker
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:16:45PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good
part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to
differentiate items that are waiting for the submitter to respond
from items that are waiting for
At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:16:45PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good
part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to
differentiate items that are waiting for the submitter to
At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote:
How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have
procmail call a script that updates your thing based on that? Given
that the messages are in a well-defined format, doesn't sound too hard
to parse out the tracker name and item summary, a URL to the
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote:
How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have
procmail call a script that updates your thing based on that? Given
that the messages are in a well-defined format, doesn't sound
I've had some packages in the tracker since Thanksgiving (that's
November for you non-Americans). I'd greatly appreciate it if someone
could take the time to pop them into cvs.
In particular, AdvanceMAME and AdvanceMenu are two awesome programs
that are much better on a Mac than xMAME, since
13 matches
Mail list logo
