On Friday, March 21, 2008, at 02:02PM, "Jean-François Mertens" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On 20 Mar 2008, at 00:35, Ben Abbott wrote:
>> On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>
>>> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>>> []
but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of any
On 20 Mar 2008, at 00:35, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>> []
>>> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in
>>> fink to gcc43
>>
>> I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the b
Revision -1001 is out now. I'm not sure if that fixes gcj (since it
will take me until Sunday actually to build it on my machine).
Matthias Ringwald wrote:
> Hi
>
> just to let you know, so far gcj in gcc43-1000 does not work.
> jack howarth did suggest a fix ( calling contrib/download_ecj in th
Hi
just to let you know, so far gcj in gcc43-1000 does not work.
jack howarth did suggest a fix ( calling contrib/download_ecj in the
source tree before compiling) but something failed.
I will re-try in the next days.
matthias
On 20.03.2008, at 00:35, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2008, at
On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in
>> fink to gcc43
>
> I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best
> plan for action at this moment. I would sug
Kevin,
I would point out again that the vectorization support
in gcc 4.3.0 is enabled automatically at -O3. So it would be
worthwhile to make sure that all packages using gcc43 are
compiling at -O3 with the gcc43 compilers.
Jack
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 07:33:43AM -0400, Ke
On 14-Mar-08, at 02:46 , Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in
>> fink to gcc43
>
> I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best
> plan for action at this moment. I would suggest that
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
[]
> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in
> fink to gcc43
I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best
plan for action at this moment. I would suggest that we band together
and do this update rather quickly.
I
