The new versions worked perfectly for me, correctly replacing texlive-base on
my main computer.
--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada
On December 30, 2014 at 10:21:39 PM, Tomoaki Okayama
([email protected]) wrote:
Thanks for your feedbacks!
I've just committed the renewed finkinfos:
- li
Thanks for your feedbacks!
I've just committed the renewed finkinfos:
- libkpathsea6.info (6.2.0-0beta1)
- texlive.info (0.20140523-0rc1)
based on your comments. Here is the summary:
(to Hanspeter)
* libiconv seems to be needed for xdvi and pxdvi in texlive. So,
BuildDepends: (%type_raw[-nox]
On December 29, 2014 at 12:25:47 PM, Tomoaki Okayama
([email protected]) wrote:
Dear Fink developers,
I've made finkinfos to update TeX Live, and I want testers.
If you're willing to test it, please checkout those finkinfo by
$ cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]
On 10.9, the new texlive built fine. Just three packaging things I can
think of since I don't use TeX:
Minor Depends: fix:
* texlive-base links to libiconv but it's not in the Depends: field
(texlive-nox-base doesn't use libiconv as far as I can tell).
Minor library upgrade:
* Can gd3 be used
Dear Fink developers,
I've made finkinfos to update TeX Live, and I want testers.
If you're willing to test it, please checkout those finkinfo by
$ cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot/fink
checkout -P -d text experimental/todai/ecc-10.7/main/finkinfo/text
and copy them to
Carsten Schultz schrieb:
> Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
>> I didn't intend to force users to use texlive. If
>> BuildDepends: texlive-texmf | tetex-texmf
>> works, it makes sense because you don't have to download the big
>> texlive-20080822-texmf-delpdf.tar.bz2 (still have to download
>> texlive-2008
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
> I didn't intend to force users to use texlive. If
> BuildDepends: texlive-texmf | tetex-texmf
> works, it makes sense because you don't have to download the big
> texlive-20080822-texmf-delpdf.tar.bz2 (still have to download
> texlive-20080816-source.tar.lzma, but the si
At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:07:28 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
>
> Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
> > At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
> > Carsten Schultz wrote:
> >> I appreciate your effort, since tetex is getting old. On the other
> >> hand, it works fine for me at the moment, and I would like postpo
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
> At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
> Carsten Schultz wrote:
>> Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
>>> Dear Fink users/developers,
>>>
>>> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
>>> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
>>>
>>> - libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, upda
At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
>
> Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
> > Dear Fink users/developers,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> > 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
> >
> > - libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
> > - texlive-texmf.i
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way
>
>> You could have texlive-texmf *just*
>> "Replaces" it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty
>> and just specifies "Depends:texlive-texmf".
>
> is a good solution, if Fi
Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way
> You could have texlive-texmf *just*
> "Replaces" it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty
> and just specifies "Depends:texlive-texmf".
is a good solution, if Fink officially employs TeX Live and
drops teTeX, with the permiss
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
> Dear Fink users/developers,
>
> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
>
> - libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
> - texlive-texmf.info (0.20080822-1, new)
> - texlive.info (0.20080816-1, new)
I appreciate you
Tomoaki Okayama said:
>
> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
Thank you for working on this!
Problem on 10.4/ppc, all up-to-date unstable as of a few days ago:
% fink update libkpathsea4
The following package will be built:
libkpa
I've also tested the patch on 10.4/PPC, 10.5/PPC and 10.5/i386,
and updated finkinfos. Thanks for your report.
Tomoaki Okayama
At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:27:29 +0200,
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> > What will happen by applying the attached patch to lcoco.c?
>
> With the patch
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> What will happen by applying the attached patch to lcoco.c?
With the patch, it builds OK.
--
Martin
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer
What will happen by applying the attached patch to lcoco.c?
At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:41:57 +0200,
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> > Dear Fink users/developers,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> > 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
>
> Buil
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> Dear Fink users/developers,
>
> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
Building texlive-0.20080816-1 fails on 10.6/64bit with the error message
gcc -g -O2 -I/sw_x86_64/lib/freetype219/include/freetype2
-I/sw_x
I've fixed PatchFile-MD5 in libkpathsea4.info. Thanks.
At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:08:52 +0200,
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> > Dear Fink users/developers,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> > 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
>
> A big Tha
Oops, I guess Martin already pointed that out.
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackB
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> Dear Fink users/developers,
>
> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
>
> - libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
> - texlive-texmf.info (0.20080822-1, new)
> - texlive.info (0.20080816-1, new)
>
>
> For users:
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> Dear Fink users/developers,
>
> I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
> 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
A big Thank You! I have been using your pre-release versions for many
months now on a daily basis, without any problems, neither with my
ra
Dear Fink users/developers,
I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
- libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
- texlive-texmf.info (0.20080822-1, new)
- texlive.info (0.20080816-1, new)
For users:
One way to switch from teTeX to TeX Live is a
On 21 Sep 2009, at 23:35, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
>> Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>>> Dear developers,
>>>
>>> I'm planning to commit finkinfos related to TeX Live in the
>>> repository: experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/text/
>>> to 10.4/unstable tree. See also the discuss
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I'm planning to commit finkinfos related to TeX Live in the
>> repository: experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/text/
>> to 10.4/unstable tree. See also the discussions in Fink-devel:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I'm planning to commit finkinfos related to TeX Live in the
> repository: experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/text/
> to 10.4/unstable tree. See also the discussions in Fink-devel:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.devel/17670
>
>
Dear developers,
I'm planning to commit finkinfos related to TeX Live in the
repository: experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/text/
to 10.4/unstable tree. See also the discussions in Fink-devel:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.devel/17670
My only worry is that there is no posit
David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:43 PM, James Bunton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> 3) We could potentially try doing the dreaded third-party "system"
>>> scheme again, cf.
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=de
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:43 PM, James Bunton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> 3) We could potentially try doing the dreaded third-party "system"
>> scheme again, cf.
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
>> func=detail&aid=1795115&group_id=172
James Bunton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>
>> 3) We could potentially try doing the dreaded third-party "system"
>> scheme again, cf.
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1795115&group_id=17203&atid=414256
>> but that of c
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> 3) We could potentially try doing the dreaded third-party "system"
> scheme again, cf.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1795115&group_id=17203&atid=414256
> but that of course has its own problems.
If n
In my opinion, we need to try to reduce dependencies on tetex:
ified or not, that tetex is too old and crufty for their typesetting needs.
2) People are busy, so coming up with a replacement package (e.g.
texlive) isn't going to happen soon, most likely.
3) We could potentially try doing the drea
John Ridgway wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>
>> John Ridgway wrote:
>>> Friends -
>>> I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through
>>> Fink, and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in
>>> the Fink project. (I looked throug
On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> John Ridgway wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through
>> Fink, and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in
>> the Fink project. (I looked through the archives of fink-deve
John Ridgway wrote:
> Friends -
> I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through Fink,
> and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in the Fink
> project. (I looked through the archives of fink-devel with nothing
> interesting poking it's head out at me.)
>
> Ar
Friends -
I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through Fink,
and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in the Fink
project. (I looked through the archives of fink-devel with nothing
interesting poking it's head out at me.)
Are there current plans as to what
At 21:49 Uhr +0100 15.10.2002, ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote:
>At 6:51 pm +0200 15/10/02, Max Horn wrote:
>>At 17:22 Uhr +0100 15.10.2002, ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote:
>>>If I wanted to run TeX on Mac OS X, is fink tetex my best bet?
>>>If not, what is?
>>
>>I'd say that very much depends on how you
At 6:51 pm +0200 15/10/02, Max Horn wrote:
>At 17:22 Uhr +0100 15.10.2002, ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote:
>>If I wanted to run TeX on Mac OS X, is fink tetex my best bet?
>>If not, what is?
>
>I'd say that very much depends on how you define "best bet". For some people (like
>me) it is the best way
At 17:22 Uhr +0100 15.10.2002, ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote:
>Quick question.
>
>If I wanted to run TeX on Mac OS X, is fink tetex my best bet?
>If not, what is?
Ben,
I'd say that very much depends on how you define "best bet". For some
people (like me) it is the best way, especially since I am
Quick question.
If I wanted to run TeX on Mac OS X, is fink tetex my best bet?
If not, what is?
Ben
--
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
for delivery of the message to such person), you m
40 matches
Mail list logo
