[Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
I have been seeing some disturbing articles lately, and based on previous relations with OpenOSX.com, they may be getting publicity that's rightfully ours. Today I recieved a MacWorld magazine. The macbeat article talked about OpenOSX Office, a CD from OpenOSX with Abiword, gnumeric, The

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:56 PM, Chris Devers wrote: On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: Additionally, they fail to provide the source code for any of the packages they distribute, and some, including the ones listed above, they fail to provide any mention at all. Wouldn't

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Let's back up for just a moment here. If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the source to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting the source on the CD. (Have you seen the CD's in question? I haven't, so maybe they are doing this.)

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Justin Hallett
I wouldn't mind trying to make it but we would once again be back to needing a logo:P Sorry trying to look at the bright side :P Thought for a fink cd we would just need the binary installer since it's web updatable and since there is no software on the cd execpt the installer ther eis no need

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Let's back up for just a moment here. If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the source to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting the source on the CD. (Have you seen

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:45 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: I have been seeing some disturbing articles lately, and based on previous relations with OpenOSX.com, they may be getting publicity that's rightfully ours. Today I recieved a MacWorld magazine. The macbeat article talked about

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: The real solution, it seems to me, is a fink CD. We could put the installer, and the complete binary distribution (including sourcefiles as always) on a CD, and we could even throw in the source for all unstable packages

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: All we have to do is make it better than OpenOSX's CD and give a free copy to MacWorld :) That I like! Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:55 PM, Chris Devers wrote: On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 08:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: The real solution, it seems to me, is a fink CD. Part of me really likes that idea, and has liked it for a while now. Part of me thinks it's way more time, effort

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ummm.about the cd-rom issue: debian has apt-cdrom, which will read files off of the cd, but will get newer ones online automagically. Just FYI. randum mumblings As for a logo, I like using Hexly, and maybe we can have a finch on his shoulder

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
David R. Morrison wrote: If I sell a CD with GPL'd software, I am only required to provide the source to my customers. So I can meet the requirement of the GPL by putting the source on the CD. (Have you seen the CD's in question? I haven't, so maybe they are doing this.) Exactly. If

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Justin Hallett
or we put a cd iso online and email the link to macworld no cost, execpt time and bandwidth. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not a bad collection for sixty bucks, but then on the other hand you can get it all for free. But on the gripping hand, they admit this. Sorta:

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:54 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: I don't read Macworld, so I wouldn't know, but have they ever done a feature or even a small article on open source software There was a backpage column about Darwin. They also had entire issue devoted to freebies, but that was

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:50 PM, Justin Hallett wrote: or we put a cd iso online and email the link to macworld no cost, execpt time and bandwidth. Maybe we can co-host with linuxiso.org? I was thinking more of mailing them a burned CD. -- Alexander Strange | Resident Geek [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Justin Hallett
but that costs money to an open source project but we can get free bandwidth hell maybe even off of apple's site. I'd be willing to make the dmg or iso. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe we can co-host with linuxiso.org? I was thinking more of mailing them a burned CD.

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 11:44 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: There's no defense, because there's no violation. Failure to give credit isn't nice, but it isn't a violation of the GPL either. Speaking of GPL violations, OpenOSX *does* distribute an update package for PHP at this page