Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-28 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 28 Feb 2005, at 00:27, Jean-François Mertens wrote: I see only the following pkgs in 10.3/unstable that depend on freetype2 : mozilla peacock ghex paragui pong gnome-pim autotrace scribus xdvik transcode mlterm Just recompiling them on an old panther machine to be sure . Was too late

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Martin Costabel
jfm wrote: [] The original purpose is still stated in DescDetail as : The freetype2 packages now exist only for compatibility with older Fink packages. Developers should use the freetype that is part of XFree86 for new packages. This formulation comes from a time when there was no xfree86-4.0 and

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
Martin Costabel wrote: My personal option for a solution would be to This all sounds good to me. Do you want to put the packages together, or should I get hacking on it? --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Matthias Neeracher
On Feb 27, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: This formulation comes from a time when there was no xfree86-4.0 and especially no xorg package yet. Right now we have no unique freetype that is part of XFree86. We are forced to live with several different not really compatible freetype2

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: My personal option for a solution would be to This all sounds good to me. Do you want to put the packages together, or should I get hacking on it? I guess I can do it if you didn't already. I'll run a couple of builds to be sure. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 27 Feb 2005, at 18:45, Martin Costabel wrote: My personal option for a solution would be to - first upgrade the current freetype2 package to 2.1.4. This is trivial to do. And to - have an additional freetype219 package that installs everything (including all its library files) into

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-27 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] Sounds perfect _ but are you sure you want 2.1.4 ? I was just treading carefully here. It is perhaps true that 2.1.7 belongs rather to the 2.1.3 group than to 2.1.9, apart from the artificial incompatibility in the freetype.h header. If we confirm this with more

[Fink-devel] freetype2 update

2005-02-26 Thread Benjamin Reed
I've got a version of freetype2/freetype2-hinting 2.1.9 in my experimental tree that, in theory, fixes issues of binary compatibility and building by older packages. It includes some patches from debian for backwards-compat as well as removing the error about including ft2build.h first. I would

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-26 Thread jfm
Hi Benjamin, I still get with mozilla : nsFreeType.cpp g++-3.3 -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include/freetype2 -o nsFreeType.o -c -DOSTYPE=\Darwin7.8.0\ -DOSARCH=\Darwin\ -I../.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 27 Feb 2005, at 02:10, jfm wrote: and I think 2.1.3 - 2.1.4 is OK with any fink pkg That was : 2.1.3 - 2.1.7 ... Jf --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.

[Fink-devel] freetype2

2005-02-17 Thread Michael
-- Tony wrote: We do need a newer version of freetype2 - I believe there are packages that don't work correctly with more recent versions though, so people are still working on it. Do you know what packages they are? Yesterday after talking to you and before the last message you sent me I

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2

2005-02-17 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Michael wrote: -- Tony wrote: We do need a newer version of freetype2 - I believe there are packages that don't work correctly with more recent versions though, so people are still working on it. Do you know what packages they are? Firefox and mozilla both don't like later versions of freetype

Re: [Fink-devel] Freetype2 ln -s needed?

2004-11-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Hans Fuchs wrote: Hello I installed freetype2 and then gnuplot. There was no freetype support. So I had to do following cd /sw/lib/ sudo ln -s libfreetype.6.3.2.dylib libfreetype.dylib This is wrong, don't do it. It is by purpose that there is no /sw/lib/libfreetype.dylib any more, so that

Re: [Fink-devel] Freetype2 ln -s needed?

2004-11-14 Thread TheSin
Also the libfoo.dylib are in the -dev pkgs, so freetype2-dev would have the link in it, And if it was linking to X11's then I'd make sure the SDK was installed. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 14-Nov-04, at 3:31 AM, Martin Costabel

[Fink-devel] Freetype2 ln -s needed?

2004-11-13 Thread Hans Fuchs
Hello I installed freetype2 and then gnuplot. There was no freetype support. So I had to do following cd /sw/lib/ sudo ln -s libfreetype.6.3.2.dylib libfreetype.dylib Then fink rebuild gnuplot. It don't know who is at error, gnuplot or freetype2. I just want you to know about the problem.

Re: [Fink-devel] Freetype2 X and fink version differences

2003-03-11 Thread Alexander Strange
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 07:30 AM, Damian Steer wrote: Using the XFree86 supplied freetype2. This (you will notice) is missing out characters randomly - but that's a different issue, I think. The odd thing is is finds all the fonts (AFAICT). XFree86 uses the 'ftmac' support in FreeType2,