I've just committed revised versions of dia, expat, libghttp, php, and xfce
which address bash and/or gcc3 issues.
(These are not my packages.)
I would like to encourage all fink developers to take a look at the lists
prepared by JF Mertens of packages which do NOT compile under gcc3. Even
if y
New successes : orbit2-2.4.0-1 gtk+2-2.0.5-1 gconf2-1.2.0-1
gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-1 libglade2-2.0.0-1 bonobo-activation2-1.0.2-1
libbonobo2-2.0.0-1 gnome-vfs2-ssl-2.0.1-1 libgnomecanvas2-2.0.1-1
ungifsicle-1.30-1 emacs-goodies-el-8-1 nana-2.5-1 nmh-1.0.4-1
algae-3.5.1-2 ntl-5.2-1 (mod the patch in the
2 more corrections : grepping through my dir of log-files
for various error symptoms, I find problems with the fommowing :
fltk-1.1.0rc1-1 : incorrect build
aterm-0.4.2-2 :
gcc -L/sw/lib -o aterm command.o graphics.o grkelot.o main.o menubar.o
misc.o netdisp.o rmemset.o screen.o scrollbar2.o utm
CORRECTION :
There is not necessarily a problem with sagasu-1.0.2-1 :
I had forgotten it depends on gtkmm and gnomemm,
which are c++ and depend in turn on libsgc++ :
so this has to wait until libsigc++ is fixed.
Some additional successes :
jdom-b8-1 neon21-0.21.1-1 xgks-2.6-1
dtdparser-1.15-1
> Why was the additional flag not needed on darwin 6 ? Is there
> then an ncurses in /usr/lib ?
Yes, Apple is providing libncurses starting with darwin 6, as they provided
zlib starting with OS X 10.1. In both cases, we'll need to support Fink
packages which have linked to the old versions, but
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 10:03 , Max Horn wrote:
> Looking at the patch, I don't quite see why the "new" patch part (for
> Darwin 6 right now) wouldn't work with gcc2. Did anybody try that
> actually?
With the line
SHLIB_LIBS='-lSystem -lcc_dynamic -lncurses -L/sw/lib'
instead of
SHLIB_L
New successes :
pango1-1.0.2-2 gd-1.8.4-10 gd2-2.0.1-4 gnumeric-1.0.7-1 (except again
for a series of 'scrollkeeper-install' crashes generated by the
'scrollkeeper-update' command. Could this be because this command is
issued in the root dir instead of in a post-install script ?)
singular-fac
readline won't compile with gcc3 on 10.1 because of the way the patch was
made. An extra library to link to has to be specified when the gcc3
compiler is being used to build shared libraries, in this instance,
and the (non-libtool) custom build-system of readline is specifying those
libraries in
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 11:55 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 13:08 Uhr -0400 15.06.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> Regarding your report for failure for the newest readline package:
>>
>> the package should compile on 10.1 with gcc2 (or the old developer
>> tools),
>> or on 10.2 with gcc3. I
At 13:08 Uhr -0400 15.06.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Regarding your report for failure for the newest readline package:
>
>the package should compile on 10.1 with gcc2 (or the old developer tools),
>or on 10.2 with gcc3. It won't compile on 10.1 with gcc3.
Just out of curiosity, why won't it
Regarding your report for failure for the newest readline package:
the package should compile on 10.1 with gcc2 (or the old developer tools),
or on 10.2 with gcc3. It won't compile on 10.1 with gcc3.
-- Dave
___
Don't miss the 2002
A couple more successes:
findutils-4.1-5 glibwww-0.2-4 imagemagick-5.4.5-1 perlmagick-
pm-5.4.5-2dx-samples-4.2.0-1
libglade-0.17-3 rep-gtk-0.15-3 libgtop-1.0.13-6 nedit-5.3-1
transfig-3.2.3d-6
xemacs-sumo-pkg-20020522-1 xemacs-21.5.4-1 bonobo-1.0.20-1 bonobo-
conf-0.14-2
gnome-mime-data--1.0.7-
More good news : the following build successfully
libiconv-1.7-5 gettext-0.10.40-3
swig-1.3.11-2 (but note: BuildDepends on drscheme _ build failed
when first I tried it with still a gcc2 drscheme - when calling
/sw/bin/mzc ...)
gnumeric-1.0.6-2 (but a bunch of scrollkeeper-install crashes at the
More successes :
gtk-doc-0.9-2 lesstif-0.93.18-7 aquaterm-0.3.0a-4 t1utils-1.26-1
surfraw-1.0.7-1 stunnel-3.22-1
storable-pm-1.0.14-1 slib-2d2-2 singular-factory-1.3b-3
singular-libfac-0.3.2-2 samba-ssl-2.2.4-1
rsync-2.5.5-1 rpl-1.3.0b3-1 rec-descent-pm-1.80-1 pure-ftpd-1.0.2-1
psutils-a4-1.17-
Much better. It's working. Thanks David!
Jeff
> --
> From: David R. Morrison
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Fink-devel] gcc3
>
> Je
Jeff, you need to install a pre-release version of the fink package
manager, in order to get the latest (from yesterday) version of glib
to compile under gcc3/bash (i.e., jag).
To install this, assuming you are using the CVS update already, go to
your "/sw/fink" directory and say "cvs checkout fi
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:11 , Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> I didn't have the same success with glib...
Went back to check my log-file at that place (and throughout in fact),
and everything is normal.
Had already before such a discrepancy in results concerning libxslt...
It might be int
rsive-am] Error 2
### make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling
glib-1.2.10-7 failed
[localhost:~] hester%
Any ideas?
Jeff
> --
> From: Jean-François Mertens
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel
Some more :
Build correctly (apparently..):
openjade-1.3.1-1 libxml2-2.4.22-2 glib-1.2.10-7 guile-1.4-4
scrollkeeper-0.2-7 gnome-print-0.36-1 gnome-games-1.4.0.4-2
pdksh-5.2.14-2 scsh-0.5.3-1 db4-4.0.14-7 popt-1.6.2-2 gnet-1.1.2-1
launch-1.0a9-2 pspell-.12.2-1 astyle-1.15.3-1 openldap-ssl-2.0.
Benjamin Reed
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: Hester, Jeffrey W.
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Fink-devel] gcc3
>
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 09:04, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > For my own portin
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 09:04, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For my own porting and development needs I'd love to see qt3 with high
> priority. :-) Maybe it already has high priority. I'm just anxiously
> awaiting this for gcc3.1 (April Dev Tools) before I can finish my port.
>
> Thank
you all do.
Glory is due you.
Jeff
> --
> From: Jean-François Mertens
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] gcc3
>
> Some more, with fink-0.9.12.cvs and the latest libtool and xfree86 :
&g
Some more, with fink-0.9.12.cvs and the latest libtool and xfree86 :
Works: sgml-entities-iso8879-1986-3 docbook-dsssl-nwalsh-1.76-1
docbook-dtd-4.1.2-2 gtk-doc-0.9-1 sdl-1.2.4-2 sdl-image-1.2.2-1
sdl-net-1.2.4-1 xfree86-base-4.2.0-6 xfree86-rootless-4.2.0-2
glib-1.2.10-6 libxpm-4.7-2 xforms-0
david
thanx very much for that explanation. so i guess i'll just try again the
packages that failed with install_name error before
> There are two versions of libtool that packages might be using. If a
> package uses libtool 1.3.5, then most likely there is a line
> "UpdateLibtool: True: in th
mathias meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> david
>
>
> > To use the pre-release version of fink, you need to check out the "fink"
> > module from CVS, cd into that directory, and run "./inject.pl".
>
> do you mean the
>
> cd tempdir/fink
> cvs -z3 update -d
> ./inject.pl
>
> procedure which
david
> To use the pre-release version of fink, you need to check out the "fink"
> module from CVS, cd into that directory, and run "./inject.pl".
do you mean the
cd tempdir/fink
cvs -z3 update -d
./inject.pl
procedure which gives me now
Package manager version: 0.9.12.cvs
Distribution versi
All of you kind folks who are testing gcc3 and bash for fink compiles, or
who have been seeded, should please update your fink installation to the
latest pre-release version. I have updated fink's ltconfig file using
Ben Hines' install_name patch, and this will immediately fix a number of
fink pa
Jean-François
> libxslt-1.0.18-1 failed with install_name error
that's strange. i just compiled it yesterday with the april dev tool
gcc3 without any error. after reading your mail i even did a fink
rebuild libxslt and copied (tee) the output to a log. in case anyone is
interested i put the l
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 03:37 , mathias meyer wrote:
> Jean-François
>
>> libxslt-1.0.18-1 failed with install_name error
>
> that's strange. i just compiled it yesterday with the april dev tool
> gcc3 without any error. after reading your mail i even did a fink
> rebuild libxslt and cop
Apparently this one didn't make it to the list :
Begin forwarded message:
> A)
> Compiled succesfully with gcc3:
> atlas-3.3.15-1 rrdtool-1.0.37-3 wget-ssl-1.8.2-1
>
> libxslt-1.0.18-1 failed with install_name error
>
> lftp-ssl_2.5.2-2 failed with :
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I.
A)
Compiled succesfully with gcc3:
atlas-3.3.15-1 rrdtool-1.0.37-3 wget-ssl-1.8.2-1
libxslt-1.0.18-1 failed with install_name error
lftp-ssl_2.5.2-2 failed with :
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -no-cpp-precomp
-I/sw/include -O2 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtua
OK, boys and girls. Here is a list of packages I have built and installed on my
system. I am currently working my way tword bundle-kde, but am having problems with
openjade-1.3.1 with gcc3. For the packages i need to patch, i will send the updates to
the maintainers (i don't mean to offend anyo
Please test this possible fix for the gcc3 install_name bug that
affects many many packages:
archive_cmds='$CC $(test .$module = .yes && echo -bundle || echo
-dynamiclib) $allow_undefined_flag -o $lib $libobjs $deplibs$linkopts
$(test .$module != .yes && echo -install_name $rpath/$soname
$tmp
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 10:39, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> This true. I tried to use qt compiled in gcc2 with my other code in gcc3
> without success. I believe it has something to do with the c++ name
> mangling in the two different compilers.
>
> I'm dependent on qt3 (the software I'm porting t
I compiled qt3 using gcc2 (from the December Tools).
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
Phone: 617-252-1818Fax:208-988-4057
On We
Chris Zubrzycki
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: David R. Morrison
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] gcc3
>
> On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 10:11 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> > I'd like to draw every
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 10:11 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> I'd like to draw everyone's attention to a new section in the docs:
>
> http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/preparing.php#gcc3
cool. don't forget: i saw somewhere that c++ libs from gcc2 will not be
compatable with programs
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to a new section in the docs:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/preparing.php#gcc3
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://de
38 matches
Mail list logo
