[Fink-devel] ld option to supress multiple definitions (from apple's list)

2002-04-23 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 should we maybe start to use this in our package's LDFLAGS? It might make finding real errors easier, especially with packages like xfree, where I get a *lot* of these warnings. I had wondered if there was an option like this, and now I found it

Re: [Fink-devel] ld option to supress multiple definitions (from apple's list)

2002-04-23 Thread Eric Norum
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 06:21 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: should we maybe start to use this in our package's LDFLAGS? It might make finding real errors easier, especially with packages like xfree, where I get a *lot* of these warnings. I had wondered if there was an option like

Re: [Fink-devel] ld option to supress multiple definitions (from apple's list)

2002-04-23 Thread Justin Hallett
as far as I'm concerned if you can compile it, and run it why worry about the warnings. I think it would be better to try and keep as close as the author intended it to be. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would it be better to use the two-level namespace support of ld instead of fighting against it?