Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > > On Oct 7, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jack Howarth > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Johnson < > daniel.johnso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 7, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > I noticed that Fedora is

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth > wrote: > > > > I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and > --with-abi-version=6 in their ncurses 6.0 package... > >

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and > --with-abi-version=6 in their ncurses 6.0 package... > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ncurses.git/tree/ncurses.spec > > but that the

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and --with-abi-version=6 in their ncurses 6.0 package... http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ncurses.git/tree/ncurses.spec but that the installed headers will only be for the --with-abi-version=6 build. Thus the legacy

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 6, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Chris, > I've posted packaging for libncursesw6-6.0-1 and ncurses6-6.0-1 to fink > tracking... > > https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4803/ > > as well as an update to

[Fink-devel] ncurses, gtk+2 and versioned dependencies

Hello, I feel a bit flustrating a bit about versioned dependencies. * The only part of the ncurses written in C++ is libncurses++.a and ncursesapp.h. The C++ code is linked to a program if and only if the program invokes ncurses C++ binding. What about removing (= 5.4-20041023-1006) from pure C

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses, gtk+2 and versioned dependencies

AIDA Shinra wrote: Hello, I feel a bit flustrating a bit about versioned dependencies. * The only part of the ncurses written in C++ is libncurses++.a and ncursesapp.h. The C++ code is linked to a program if and only if the program invokes ncurses C++ binding. What about removing (=

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses, gtk+2 and versioned dependencies

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:55:49PM +0900, AIDA Shinra wrote: Hello, I feel a bit flustrating a bit about versioned dependencies. * The 10.3 tree has gtk+2-2.6.10-4, while the 10.4 tree has gtk+2-2.6.10-1004. No differences between them except the Revision. Assume that a package wants to

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses, gtk+2 and versioned dependencies

On 5/8/07, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:55:49PM +0900, AIDA Shinra wrote: Hello, I feel a bit flustrating a bit about versioned dependencies. * The 10.3 tree has gtk+2-2.6.10-4, while the 10.4 tree has gtk+2-2.6.10-1004. No differences between them

[Fink-devel] ncurses 'backport' from 10.3 tree

Hi, I just noticed that the ncurses 5.3-12 available in 10.2-gcc3.3 does not support prebinding. A couple packages depending on ncurses are therefore not prebound, either. I copied the version 5.3-20031018-2 available in the 10.3 tree to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and it works flawlessly (as far as

[Fink-devel] ncurses 5.3

Ok. I have finally committed ncurses 5.3, and just wanted to let everyone know. I have verified that the previously missing symbols are in fact there, and tested the libs with old and new ncurses progs, no problems. I also committed versions for 10.1, which i know at least a few people use. I

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hey guys. I have a new revision of ncurses 5.2, which should also know about apple's terminfo entries, as well as termcap stuff, and I

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Too bad about the symbol changes in 5.3 I can't use it yet, anyway both built for me without any problems on 10.2.1. (Nice that

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:28 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Too bad about the

[Fink-devel] ncurses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hey guys. I have a new revision of ncurses 5.2, which should also know about apple's terminfo entries, as well as termcap stuff, and I also packed up ncurses 5.3, which is binary compatible. Could some people maybe test them and Max, they are your