Re: [Fink-devel] system-ghostscript8

2004-02-14 Thread David R. Morrison
Martin: Your proposed ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts, and system-ghostscript8 packages look good to me. Jeff: If you agree, I think we should move all three of these into fink. -- Dave Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > [] > > In light of the apparent c

Re: [Fink-devel] system-ghostscript8

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: [] In light of the apparent continued need for Fontmap (which is not in Wierda's distribution), I've chosen #1. Wondering how GW's ghostscript can function without a Fontmap file, I spent some more time with this, and it seems it is more complicated: There is actually a F

Re: [Fink-devel] system-ghostscript8

2004-02-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > If one leaves the fonts directory as it is and doesn't run type1inst at > all, the problem goes away, too. The files "fonts.scale" and "fonts.dir" > are already there, and I don't know if the additional file "Fontmap" is > needed by anything.

Re: [Fink-devel] system-ghostscript8

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Martin Costabel wrote: [] Unrecoverable error: rangecheck in get Operand stack: hrsyr.gsf0 This hrsyr.gsf is one of those Hershey fonts. If one removes the ghostscript-fonts part of the system-ghostscript8 package and installs the Fink ghostscript-fonts package, everything seems to

[Fink-devel] system-ghostscript8

2004-02-01 Thread Martin Costabel
I tried the system-ghostscript8 package from 10.2-gcc3.3 on 10.3 - I even installed iinstaller and the ghostscript8 ipackage. The system-ghostscript8 package installs OK. I even installs when its version is 8.00, although the gs version installed with the iinstaller is 8.13. There is a /usr/loc