Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-09 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Strange wrote: [] I redownloaded it and got a THIRD sum. curl -f -L -s -S -P - -O http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/office/siag/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz [lamancha:~/sw/src] feanor% md5 siag-3.5.2.tar.gz MD5 (siag-3.5.2.tar.gz) = 3bdbd9de06082d5de3c4d960b6d2d0ba I bet what you downloaded is an html error

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Samstag, März 8, 2003, at 06:37 Uhr, Alexander Strange wrote: The following unstable packages have bad checksums: Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is incorrect. Fixed. Thank

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Ben Hines
You could make part of your script email these to the maintainers. -Ben On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: The following unstable packages have bad checksums: Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Masanori Sekino
MD5 of libxml seems fine for me. On 2003.3.8, at 02:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: The following unstable packages have bad checksums: Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is incorrect. Checksum of tarball

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Strange wrote: [] Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect. Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source download fails? The copies of siag-3.5.2.tar.gz I can get my hands on have the right checksum, but it

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:10 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Strange wrote: [] Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect. Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source download fails? The copies of

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 09.03.03 um 02:10 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel: Alexander Strange wrote: [] Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect. Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source download fails? The copies of

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages with bad MD5s

2003-03-08 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Max Horn wrote: Yes libxml and siag have correct MD5s for me here, too. Max I get these MD5s: 80169faebe7bca9fd531b53b6c5d3ed5 in the .info file 624519aaf9149142cd87f79e1ac4a58c in the