Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-04 Thread Joe Corneli
Fair enough. I'm happy that it is so easy to change compile time options. But I'm still interested in a more "intelligent" software managing system for sometime down the road. One would have to do a lot of prep work, however, it seems quite conceivable that one would be able to leverage the softw

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Actually I've been meaning to do up a document on this, for the benefit of users who want to muck around with their compile-time options. The day job keeps interfering, though. -- Alexander Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On Feb 4, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Joe Corneli wr

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-04 Thread Benjamin Reed
Joe Corneli wrote: I'm really talking about two things, one of which is no problem. 1. being able to change compile time options No problem, its already possible. Everyone agrees that you better know roughly what you're doing, or the package won't work. 2. being able to dynamically find & sat

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-04 Thread Joe Corneli
I'm really talking about two things, one of which is no problem. 1. being able to change compile time options No problem, its already possible. Everyone agrees that you better know roughly what you're doing, or the package won't work. 2. being able to dynamically find & satisfy dependencies

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Remi Mommsen wrote: [] on. You are asking for an interactive mode for creating package files... In addition it violates the fink policy that a deb file with a given name/version/revision should be identical regardless how and where it was built. It violates the even more important principle that

Re: lynx-cookies & such (was Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install)

2004-02-03 Thread Alexander Strange
This sounds a lot like portage. On Feb 3, 2004, at 8:46 PM, Joe Corneli wrote: You hit the nail on the head there. It isn't just the compile-time options, but several details of the lynx configuration file that need to be fiddled with. However, the problem with making a new package is we'd proba

lynx-cookies & such (was Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install)

2004-02-03 Thread Joe Corneli
You are asking for an interactive mode for creating package files... In addition it violates the fink policy that a deb file with a given name/version/revision should be identical regardless how and where it was built. It would be possible to save the interactively generated file with

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

2004-02-03 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Joe, On Feb 3, 2004, at 4:28 PM, Joe Corneli wrote: For the finicky fink user, it would be nice to be able to inspect and modify the configuration options at build time - so something like % fink finicky-install lynx-ssl These options will be passed to configure: --enable-nls --with-screen=ncu