Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problem in lyx-1.6.10 for 10.7

2011-09-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 09/12/2011 04:28 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H - -I. -I../.. -I./.. -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS - -I/sw/lib/qt4-mac/include -I/sw/lib/qt4-mac/include/QtCore -DQT_SHARED - -I/sw/include -g -O2 -c -o LinkBack.lo `test -f

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problem with new plplot pkg

2008-01-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jean-François Mertens wrote: Hi, Sorry to have left for Xmas in a rush, leaving to Martin to fix problems.. I was aware that some problems remained with plplot, but thought of them as not as not that urgent, especially over Xmas time _ so had taken the new version 5.8.0 with me, and just

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool file pointing to fink build dir

2007-02-11 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:23:57AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Can somebody remind me what the fix is when a .la file points to the fink build directory? I'm going to start a wiki page for validation errors and their fixes.

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool file pointing to fink build dir

2007-02-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 11, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Can somebody remind me what the fix is when a .la file points to the fink build directory? I'm going to start a wiki page for validation errors and their fixes. Most of the time this is due to an upstream error, they have '-L./foo/ bar

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problems in a new package?

2005-11-26 Thread Benjamin Reed
Kevin Horton wrote: .libs/gtkdatabox_cross_simple.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section (__DATA,__common) .libs/gtkdatabox_text.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section (__DATA,__common) .libs/gtkdatabox_marker.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problems in a new package?

2005-11-26 Thread Kevin Horton
On 26 Nov 2005, at 16:17, Benjamin Reed wrote: Kevin Horton wrote: .libs/gtkdatabox_cross_simple.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section (__DATA,__common) .libs/gtkdatabox_text.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section (__DATA,__common) .libs/gtkdatabox_marker.o

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problems in a new package?

2005-11-26 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Horton wrote: | ld: multiple definitions of symbol _GtkDataboxDisplayType | .libs/gtkdatabox.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in section | (__DATA,__common) | .libs/gtkdatabox_points.o definition of _GtkDataboxDisplayType in | section

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool problems in a new package?

2005-11-26 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Kevin Horton wrote: Thanks for the pointer. I think I've found the definition in gtkdatabox.h: enum /* Types of data display */ { GTK_DATABOX_NOT_DISPLAYED = 0,/* hidden */ GtkDataboxDisplayType; I'll do some Googling to figure out how to move that to one

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries

2004-08-24 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Dale Grover wrote: I am trying to get the most recent source for xcircuit (3.2.23) to run, so that hopefully the Fink package can be updated to a more recent version. (xcircuit is a schematic entry / drawing program.) In brief, I *seem* to be

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries

2004-08-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Dale Grover wrote: I am trying to get the most recent source for xcircuit (3.2.23) to run, so that hopefully the Fink package can be updated to a more recent version. (xcircuit is a schematic entry / drawing program.) In brief, I *seem* to be running into a problem with libtool. During the

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries

2004-08-24 Thread Dale Grover
At 11:28 PM +0200 8/24/04, Martin Costabel wrote: Dale Grover wrote: I am trying to get the most recent source for xcircuit (3.2.23) to run, so that hopefully the Fink package can be updated to a more recent version. (xcircuit is a schematic entry / drawing program.) In brief, I *seem* to be

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries

2004-08-24 Thread Alexander Strange
On Aug 24, 2004, at 7:44 PM, Dale Grover wrote: One key seems to be which libtool is in fact used; once I learn how to change what libtool is called by gcc, it should be clearer. (A previous reply suggests this would be a good path, but I'm unclear on the process.) At the moment the Apple

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries

2004-08-23 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
Hi Dale, Have you tried passing -Wl,-bind_at_load ? By the way, if you pass -v -v to gcc, it will show you the libtool and ld commands it's running, so you can examine what's going wrong. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool not finding libgnomevfs-2

2003-08-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 08:30 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: 'autoreconf -f' (from autoconf2.5 (2.57-1)). I see no warnings or errors during ./configure or make, until: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -g -L/sw/lib -o gael -export-dynamic main.o -L/sw/lib -lgnomevfs-2 gcc -g

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool 1.4

2003-05-29 Thread David R. Morrison
What is the point of LibTool in Fink, Mac OS X include version 1.4.2 from glibtool --version: ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4.2 (1.4 2001/11/19 00:06:02) Sure, and now libtool is up to 1.5 . The newer versions have a lot of Darwin/Mac OS X-specific improvements, in fact (many of which were

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool 1.4

2003-05-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 09:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: What is the point of LibTool in Fink, Mac OS X include version 1.4.2 from glibtool --version: ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4.2 (1.4 2001/11/19 00:06:02) Sure, and now libtool is up to 1.5 . The newer versions have a lot of Darwin/Mac

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool module behavior and darwin

2002-11-26 Thread Nick Hudson
On Monday 25 November 2002 2:43 pm, Max Horn wrote: An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules? Why? What benefit is there in

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool module behavior and darwin

2002-11-25 Thread Max Horn
An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules? Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool multiple symbols

2002-09-18 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 10:30 PM, Sébastien Pierre wrote: libpython2.2.a(stacklesseval.o) definition of _slp_schedule_hook in section (__DATA,__common) make: *** [python.exe] Error 1 ### execution of (export failed, exit code 2 Looking at ranlib man page I tried both

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool multiple symbols

2002-09-18 Thread Sébastien Pierre
Le mercredi, 18 sep 2002, à 16:41 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines a écrit : Try -fno-common in the CFLAGS. I already use that :( Thanks anyway, -- Sébastien -- «My friends says we're like the dinosaurs, only we are doing ourselves in much faster than they ever did.» http://www.type-z.org

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool multiple symbols

2002-09-18 Thread Ben Hines
It might not be CFLAGS, but you need to get it on that compile line. Are you sure it's compiling with the fno-common? -Ben On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 09:44 AM, Sébastien Pierre wrote: Le mercredi, 18 sep 2002, à 16:41 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines a écrit : Try -fno-common in the

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool multiple symbols

2002-09-18 Thread Sébastien Pierre
Le mercredi, 18 sep 2002, à 19:57 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines a écrit : It might not be CFLAGS, but you need to get it on that compile line. Are you sure it's compiling with the fno-common? Yes: (..) gcc -c -DNDEBUG -O4 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-common -I. -I./Include -I./Stackless

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce Korb
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: I applied the patch to this: http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz Great program! It would be nice to have that on OS X. Thank you. Do we have it yet? :-) Viz., did you try to build it? My G4 came with OS/9 and I threw it away for NetBSD,

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 16:38:08 -0700 Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: I applied the patch to this: http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz Great program! It would be nice to have that on OS X. Thank you. Do we have it yet? :-)

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce Korb
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Viz., did you try to build it? Not game :-). Building stuff on OSX can involve a bit of pain and I'm only willing to go through that for my own software :-). My problem is similar: I don't want to spend my own money buying OS/X to make products for Apple to

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Ben Hines
To answer your original question, the libtool patch in question has apparently already been incorporated into libtool CVS. It is darwin-specific (if you look at what you are patching :) it is in a darwin-only section) so it definitely doesn't cause any problems. :) -Ben --

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread David R. Morrison
I'm trying to build autogen now, and it looks pretty easy. By the way, are you aware that sourceforge has two Mac OS X boxes in their compile farm? :-) -- Dave ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-08 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:48:18 -0400 David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might have to edit ltmain.sh by hand, in order to apply Dave's patch... Ouch. A bit ugly, but it worked :-). Thans to all. Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-08 Thread Ben Hines
At 6:27 PM +1000 6/8/02, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:48:18 -0400 David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might have to edit ltmain.sh by hand, in order to apply Dave's patch... Ouch. A bit ugly, but it worked :-). Not at all. It is normal. There are so many

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Erik. You haven't told us what problem you're having! We've run into a number of different libtool problems, and have done our best to address them. We send patches back to the libtool team but I'm not sure if all of them have been accepted. You might have a look at

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 21:11:14 -0400 David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Erik. You haven't told us what problem you're having! We've run into a number of different libtool problems, and have done our best to address them. We send patches back to the libtool team but I'm not sure

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-07 Thread David R. Morrison
You might have to edit ltmain.sh by hand, in order to apply Dave's patch... -- another Dave (msg resent by request) ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-12 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 11/4/02 10:47 AM, Justin Hallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry I don't remember there being an issue, as a matter a fact I thought giftcurs worked fine?? GiFTcurs works fine, and so does the giFT daemon, but the GTK+ front-end doesn't (it is obsolete anyway, I believe... GiFTcurs is

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-12 Thread Justin Hallett
well I got giFT-skt to work and sent it to beren, he informed me that he had just got it to work as well..but I do agree I'd use the curs version first. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GiFTcurs works fine, and so does the giFT daemon, but the GTK+ front-end doesn't (it is obsolete anyway, I believe...

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm sorry I don't remember there being an issue, as a matter a fact I thought giftcurs worked fine?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a problem with giFT. I need to disable dlopen, and manually add - -ldl to the LDFLAGS, or else it compiles fine, but says it cannot find symbols at runtime. I

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 not giFTcurs. giFT-gtk. I cannot the gtk client to compile with the - --no-dlopen option. Without it, it compiles fine, but It cannot find the symbols in the .so file. On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 08:47 PM, Justin Hallett wrote: I'm

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 10:42 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 not giFTcurs. giFT-gtk. I cannot the gtk client to compile with the - --no-dlopen option. Without it, it compiles fine, but It cannot find the symbols in the .so file. What

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 when I try to run the damenon, I get [chris@localhost:~/development/local/net$] giFT ** gift-debug:Loading protocols... ** gift-fatal:couldn't load protocol in file /sw/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so: dlcompat: unable to find symbol OpenFT_init

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [chris@localhost:/sw/src/gift-0.10.0-20020408/OpenFT$] otool -L /sw/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so /sw/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so: /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker found

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks a lot...it was even easier than that. here's the diff: - - --- gift-0.10.0-20020408.orig/src/protocol.cThu Apr 11 00:01:49 2002 +++ gift-0.10.0-20020408/src/protocol.c Thu Apr 11 00:02:31 2002 @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool fun

2002-04-08 Thread Max Horn
At 21:12 Uhr -0400 07.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 does anyone know if there is a good guide to libtool and the other auto* utilities? http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/ I recommend you to buy a copy, not only to support them, but it's really

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool fun, and splitoffs

2002-04-07 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 does anyone know if there is a good guide to libtool and the other auto* utilities? i am getting an error building the musicbrainz client. it is getting a parse error somehow, and it seems to double-include the same lib, so it fails. i would