[Fink-devel] new BuildDepends entries

2002-04-21 Thread David R. Morrison
As part of the shared libraries project, I have just added new BuildDepends entries to several dozen existing packages. I will be doing this again in the future. Please be careful when updating a package to check out the old version from CVS, and see if there are extra BuildDepends entries which

[Fink-devel] fink-shlibdeps

2002-04-21 Thread Masanori Sekino
Hi all, I wrote tiny shlibs dependency checker named `fink-shlibdeps'. You can download it from: http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA008857/macosx/fink/index.html#fink-shlibdeps If it is useful for others, I'll make a package of it. Here is a copy of README file: ---

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-shlibdeps

2002-04-21 Thread Max Horn
Ah, so this is similiar to dpkg-shlibdeps. I wonder how this compared to my modified version of dpkg-shlibdeps which also is supposed to do the same job? Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-shlibdeps

2002-04-21 Thread Masanori Sekino
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:05:18 +0200 Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, so this is similiar to dpkg-shlibdeps. I wonder how this compared > to my modified version of dpkg-shlibdeps which also is supposed to do > the same job? My fink-shlibdeps was a quick hack and not tested well. If your

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-shlibdeps

2002-04-21 Thread Ben Hines
At 4:51 AM +0900 4/22/02, Masanori Sekino wrote: > >I need any dependency checker ASAP because package dependency between >GNOME2 packages are complicated and hard to maintain without automation... A graphical dependency browser would be a perfect thing to have in FinkCommander. It could be fo

[Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf-shlibs update broken

2002-04-21 Thread Max Horn
Dave, the new gdk-pixbuf-shlibs can't be smoothly upgraded while gdk-pixbuf is installed - you moved some files (%i/lib/gdk-pixbuf/loaders/*.la ) from the master to the -shlibs splitoff. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email:

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-shlibdeps

2002-04-21 Thread Max Horn
At 13:20 Uhr -0700 21.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote: >At 4:51 AM +0900 4/22/02, Masanori Sekino wrote: >> >>I need any dependency checker ASAP because package dependency between >>GNOME2 packages are complicated and hard to maintain without automation... > > > >A graphical dependency browser would be a

[Fink-devel] new zope package

2002-04-21 Thread Kilian Koepsell
hi, i just checked in a package for the zope web application server. maybe, there is anybody on this list using zope who wants to give it a try... it includes a start/stop script 'zopectl' adapted from debian. kilian ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAI

Re: [Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf-shlibs update broken

2002-04-21 Thread David R. Morrison
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave, > > the new gdk-pixbuf-shlibs can't be smoothly upgraded while gdk-pixbuf > is installed - you moved some files (%i/lib/gdk-pixbuf/loaders/*.la ) > from the master to the -shlibs splitoff. > > Max Thanks for pointing this out, Max. I'm having tro

Re: [Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf-shlibs update broken

2002-04-21 Thread David R. Morrison
OK, I put a different version of gdk-pixbuf into the shared-libraries/splitoff module, in case somebody else wants to try out the one that gave the error messages in my previous email. -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lis

Re: [Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf-shlibs update broken

2002-04-21 Thread Chris Devers
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, David R. Morrison wrote: > OK, I put a different version of gdk-pixbuf into the shared-libraries/splitoff > module, in case somebody else wants to try out the one that gave the error > messages in my previous email. Still getting errors. Full log is at http://homepage.mac.co

Re: [Fink-devel] gdk-pixbuf-shlibs update broken

2002-04-21 Thread David R. Morrison
The version I put into shared-libraries/splitoff this evening was gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0-5, but your error log referred to gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0-4. I hope that if you checkout the shared-libraries CVS module and use revision 5, it will install for you. However, there is a deeper problem with the package;