[Fink-devel] -shlibs conundrum

2002-05-04 Thread Benjamin Reed
In continuing to work on KDE, we've run into a couple of interesting problems with the -shlibs splitoff. KDE uses libltdl heavily for dlopening libraries on the fly, and uses the .la's to determine the names of those libraries. Things will not even start without the .la's, so this will be an

Re: [Fink-devel] -shlibs conundrum

2002-05-04 Thread Max Horn
At 10:42 Uhr -0400 04.05.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >In continuing to work on KDE, we've run into a couple of interesting >problems with the -shlibs splitoff. KDE uses libltdl heavily for >dlopening libraries on the fly, and uses the .la's to determine the >names of those libraries. > >Things

Re: [Fink-devel] -shlibs conundrum

2002-05-04 Thread David R. Morrison
Here are my thoughts (on the original message and Max's followup): How hard would it be to modify things so that everything was installed into libs/kde-2.0/ rather than libs/ ? (I chose a random version number, of course you should use the actual one.) If this can be done without too much tro

Re: [Fink-devel] -shlibs conundrum

2002-05-04 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, at 11:11 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > Here are my thoughts (on the original message and Max's followup): > > How hard would it be to modify things so that everything was installed > into > libs/kde-2.0/ > rather than libs/ ? (I chose a random version number, of co

[Fink-devel] Re: updating gettext

2002-05-04 Thread Max Horn
At 19:18 Uhr +0200 04.05.2002, Sylvain Cuaz wrote: >Hi, > > gettext is now at version 0.11.2 whereas ours is still at >0.10.40, so I decided to update it, but there's a problem : libintl >is now at 2.0.1 (from 1.0.1), Do we gain anything by this update? Is there anything yet requiring it

Re: [Fink-devel] imlib and libungif dependency problem

2002-05-04 Thread Jean-François Mertens
And amaya-gtk depends on libungif _ which is NOT provided by gifib (and this is a "main package") This is something the recent discussion didn't clarify for me: for long, libungif provided giflib, and not the other way around, which I would rather have expected. Possibly there was a reason, but w

Re: [Fink-devel] imlib and libungif dependency problem

2002-05-04 Thread David R. Morrison
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois_Mertens?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And amaya-gtk depends on libungif _ which is NOT provided by gifib > (and this is a "main package") > This is something the recent discussion didn't clarify for me: > for long, libungif provided giflib, and not the other way ar