On Friday, July 19, 2002, at 07:43 AM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> Also, item 2 is odd. If /sw/lib/perl5 is properly built, it already
> knows
> where it is installed, and doesn't need the PERL5LIB setting.
Unless I misunderstand you - fink does not have its own perl package
currently, just som
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 07:33 , Ben Hines wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 19, 2002, at 07:43 AM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>>
>> Also, item 2 is odd. If /sw/lib/perl5 is properly built, it already knows
>> where it is installed, and doesn't need the PERL5LIB setting.
>
> Unless I misunderstand you
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 08:59 AM, drieux wrote:
>
>
> Since the OSX box already has a version of perl that
> comes with it, then there is a canonical version of perl
> that is available that would allow one to know where it
> is putting
>
> site_local
>
> modules - hence why not insta
On Saturday, July 20, 2002, at 03:52 AM, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Chris Devers wrote:
>
>> For that matter, "fink install perl" to upgrade a hypothetical
>> /sw/bin/perl to 5.8 would be great, but this isn't a popular idea
>> because
>> of concerns that Fink shouldn't 'p
I would like to be able to port the GNUStep (www.gnustep.org) tools to
macosx and darwin, as this would allow me to more easily port GNUstep
apps to cocoa, and vice-versa.
Has anyone tried this?
I've started on a fink .info for gnustep-make.
However, the configure script for gnustep-core seem
jeremy
> I would like to be able to port the GNUStep (www.gnustep.org) tools to
> macosx and darwin, as this would allow me to more easily port GNUstep
> apps to cocoa, and vice-versa.
>
> Has anyone tried this?
yes, i have some time ago. well, just a little as i was interested in
gworkspace
