[Fink-devel] Re: Who did commit unstable/util/hflf on Sun Nov 23 17:53:36 2003 ?

2003-12-04 Thread "D. Höhn"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Arnaud Launay wrote: | | Anyway, for the placement: in FreeBSD and OpenBSD, hlfl is | classified under "security", it's under "net-misc" in Gentoo and | "net" in Debian. How do you call something which create firewall | rules, if not related to ne

[Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
Hi, Just updated fink, and now : ... dpkg-deb: building package `cups-dev' in `/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.deb'. /bin/ln -sf /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.de

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
looks lik eit's linking against the old lib and the new ssl, My change caused this I'll look at it this morn, thanks. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Dec-03, at 5:12 AM, jfm wrote: Hi, Just updated fink, and now : ... dpkg-deb: b

[Fink-devel] experimental/ dirs should be writable by everyone?

2003-12-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Masanori Sekino wrote: | Added Files: | gnome2-user-docs.info yelp.patch | Log Message: | sync with kconger's packages. | This is a little nuts. Originally the experimental/ module was meant to allow developers to help each other get packages work

Re: [Fink-devel] experimental/ dirs should be writable by everyone?

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Donnerstag, 04.12.03 um 16:22 Uhr schrieb Peter O'Gorman: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Masanori Sekino wrote: | Added Files: | gnome2-user-docs.info yelp.patch | Log Message: | sync with kconger's packages. | This is a little nuts. Originally the experimental/ module was

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Donnerstag, 04.12.03 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: P.S. If you are running on 10.2, you should install test-simple-pm by hand before updating fink from CVS HEAD. The "essential" versions of the new packages are present during the bootstrap, but haven't yet been added to the unstab

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Mittwoch, 03.12.03 um 06:05 Uhr schrieb TheSin: isn't = it's sorry --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 2-Dec-03, at 9:52 PM, Ben Hines wrote: That sentence makes no sense -Ben On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:45 PM, TheSin wrote: it's not dia i

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread David R. Morrison
P.S. If you are running on 10.2, you should install test-simple-pm by hand before updating fink from CVS HEAD. The "essential" versions of the new packages are present during the bootstrap, but haven't yet been added to the unstable trees. ---

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
how the hell does it not make sense?? it's not dia, it's libunicode-gnome, I've already poster this to fink-devel... --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Dec-03, at 9:02 AM, Max Horn wrote: it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've alre

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread David R. Morrison
I agree that making these packages essential is not a great solution. In fact, if we make the test code conditional on the presence of the Test:: stuff, then we can just add these packages to the bootstrap when needed (like with storable-pm560). Thanks for the suggestion, Max, I'll look into modif

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread Darian Lanx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 David R. Morrison wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, Max, I'll look into modifying t/00compile to make this work (although I'm a bit scared to touch that!). personally I think that the whole purpouse of the test suit is defied if we cannot or bet

[Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear fink-devel, I've added code which causes the fink test suite to be run every time you bootstrap or inject fink. This required the introduction of three new essential packages in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and earlier: file-spec-pm, test-simple-pm, and test-harness-pm. Please let me know if you en

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

2003-12-04 Thread David R. Morrison
Sure. The change which Max is suggesting only affects running the test suite while fink is being bootstrapped, and also during the first time the user upgrades to fink-0.18.0 (or whatever release this code becomes part of). After that, the test suite will be run each time the user installs fink.

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
try current HEAD now. Also if you know of a build that needs to switch db3 and db4 a few times or something like that could you test it or tell me :P Again thanks for your reports. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Dec-03, at 5:12

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 5:54 PM, TheSin wrote: try current HEAD now. Also if you know of a build that needs to switch db3 and db4 a few times or something like that could you test it or tell me :P Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : ... All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=492, 56 wallclock secs

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 6:47 PM, jfm wrote: Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : PS: I read : "But I think this is the end of the road for my changes, as I'm upsetting ppl now" I'd be sorry about that. My msgs didn't imply at all I was upset _ on the contrary. "On ne fait pas d'omellette sans casser d

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
that was just the old files getting replaced still. It won't now. Or shouldn't since it doesn't for me. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Dec-03, at 10:47 AM, jfm wrote: On Dec 4, 2003, at 5:54 PM, TheSin wrote: try current HEAD n

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
hehe thanks for the encouragement, but it wasn't you i was referring to, I love getting up and getting your bug reports, gives me something to work on :) --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Dec-03, at 10:54 AM, jfm wrote: On Dec 4, 200

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Donnerstag, 04.12.03 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb TheSin: how the hell does it not make sense?? it's not dia, it's libunicode-gnome, I've already poster this to fink-devel... --- So you are saying, the dia.info file contains libunicode-gnome, not dia. From a quick look, that's not true. Hence I gues

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
the bug was not in dia it's in libunicode-gnome, and it doesn't matter anymore since Clef was working on a newer version of dia which I didn't know, I was just letting him know that I started to debug it to save him time, is all, it's not a big deal. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the

[Fink-devel] libmikmod-3.1.10-2

2003-12-04 Thread John Davidorff Pell
When building, libmikmod-3.1.10-2 calls gcc with "-pthread" which results in numerous warnings. It works, but I think that changing it to "-lpthread" would make it happier. Whoever is in charge of this, could you take a look? Thanx. JP -- John Davidorff Pell [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Des

Re: [Fink-devel] libmikmod-3.1.10-2

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
-pthread and -lpthread aen't the same, I think -pthread could just be removed, likely a configure script problem, but it's harmless and is likely the reason why the maintainer didn't remove it in the first place. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with th

Re: [Fink-devel] libmikmod-3.1.10-2

2003-12-04 Thread John Davidorff Pell
Ok, works for me. I just noticed a whole bunch of warnings and I thought I'd let the maintainer know, which is fink-devel... JP On Dec 4, 2003, at 10:56 AM, TheSin wrote: -pthread and -lpthread aen't the same, I think -pthread could just be removed, likely a configure script problem, but it's

[Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-04 Thread Blair Zajac
Hello, I'm getting this failure with installing gtk+2 2.2.4-2 on 10.3: % fink install gtk+2 gtk+2-dev gtk+2-shlibs ... ... ... checking pixbuf loaders to build... checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes checking return type of signal handlers... (cached) void checking for x86 pl

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Check the "config.log" file in the build directory to see if there's more information there. Also, try running "freetype-config --libs" and see what you get. On my Panther box, with XFree86 and freetype (but not freetype2) installed, I get -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lfreetype On Thursday, December 4,

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-04 Thread Blair Zajac
"Alexander K. Hansen" wrote: > > Check the "config.log" file in the build directory to see if there's > more information there. Also, try running "freetype-config --libs" and > see what you get. On my Panther box, with XFree86 and freetype (but > not freetype2) installed, I get > > -L/usr/X11R6

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Mittwoch, 03.12.03 um 05:56 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: it is good to work in CVS. But for major dep engine changes you might want to work in a 'branch' instead, not HEAD. I fully agree with Ben. In fact, I am not happy about the recent addition of BuildConflicts. It seems very half baked to me.

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
Already stated I will no longer work be working on fink's code base unless it's to fix something that I created. Sorry to try and advance fink instead of complaining yet again about something that has been discuss a dozen times already. I have two branches already they don't work, they have be

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread Max Horn
Am Donnerstag, 04.12.03 um 22:36 Uhr schrieb TheSin: Already stated I will no longer work be working on fink's code base unless it's to fix something that I created. That's not what I asked you for, but of course it's your own decision on how you want to react in this situation. Sorry to try an

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
I completely agree but shlibs and uidgid have been done since before 10.3 and they are not updated and not merge though I point them out almost weekly. And I got tried of working for nothing, this way it's tested, reported and worked on. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning an

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
I did announce this, and hence where Clef's comment came from. And to a degree it's trail and error, but it's tested first it's just that I'm on top of the report, ppl want different output, reading the code essential is passed on the splitoffs from the arent but drm didn't want that to be true

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
I didn't make the branches and I wasn't the only who knew of them and I mentioned to lots of finkers, including rangerrick, drm and dmalloc. There is only so much I can do. many other have been waitting for such features as well, like jasonc and there is even a tracker item for the user handl

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
Well i don't see this as true, it's well commented and I've read threw it a few times, and I'd likely jump into it someday I just think a few more things where more important and needed dealing with first. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread TheSin
it worked great, I have no idea what you mean, it added and removed and checked (as to not double add) users and removed them if no pkg depended on them. Of course I wrote it on 10.2 and niutil may have changed so it my not work on 10.3 thought I c an see why not, and it was all done in the p

Re: [Fink-devel] experimental/ dirs should be writable by everyone?

2003-12-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Max Horn wrote: | Well... if people really follow the rules and only touch other peoples | stuff if they beforehand asked and got permission, fine by me. If | somebody breaks that rule, we gotta kick him. So go ahead, just keep an | eye on the commits l

Re: [Fink-devel] libmikmod-3.1.10-2

2003-12-04 Thread Alexander Strange
On Dec 4, 2003, at 1:48 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: When building, libmikmod-3.1.10-2 calls gcc with "-pthread" which results in numerous warnings. It works, but I think that changing it to "-lpthread" would make it happier. Whoever is in charge of this, could you take a look? Thanx. JP -lp

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Blair Zajac wrote: [] But the test file has a bad #include line: #include FT_ERRORS_H This is not a bad #include line, it is just the usual freetype/freetype2 mixup. [] | #include | #include FT_ERRORS_H Both freetype and freetype2 have headers that answer to the name , and they are, of course,

[Fink-devel] Not on the list but..

2003-12-04 Thread Harry Tormey
I would just like to suggest that this http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/10.3-upgrade.php should be displayed displayed on the front page. I know it would have helped me solve a number of my problems on my own. -Harry --- This SF.net email i

[Fink-devel] Re: Who did commit unstable/util/hflf on Sun Nov 23 17:53:36 2003 ?

2003-12-04 Thread Arnaud Launay
Le Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:54:09AM +0100, Darian Lanx a écrit: > >Comments ? > OOps. I guess that was me. I didn't realise that there is a hlfl package > already, I must have overlooked it. This was done unintentional and I > apologize. Please do remove my package if you have CVS access, if not,

[Fink-devel] rsync & mirrors

2003-12-04 Thread b.bum
Attached is what should be a working rsync-2.5.7 info file. Unfortunately, the custom mirror spec seems to be broken; fink is attempting to use mirrors like opendarwin.org, etc, when it should be using the URLs provided by the CustomMirror configuration. rsync-2.5.7-1.info Description: Binar

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

2003-12-04 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 4, 2003, at 1:36 PM, TheSin wrote: Already stated I will no longer work be working on fink's code base unless it's to fix something that I created. Sorry to try and advance fink instead of complaining yet again about something that has been discuss a dozen times already. Aw cmon don't