Peter O'Gorman wrote:
You don't have to add the libgfortran patch if it is a pain. I expect
someone on gcc-patches will eventually respond to my pinging and this
will make it into a release.
Peter:
I put it in and it compiles fine - haven't tried to make a shared lib
though. gfortran passes th
Hi,
On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:23, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Perhaps I'll make a gcc4 package a splitoff of gfortran - what do you
think?
GCC4 has several new features, including auto vectorization and tree-ssa
optimization. It sounds very attractive that fink has gcc4 package.
I have used some cvs/snapshot
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything
(c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts
gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them up?
As long as you added a prefix or suffix to the gcc and g++ executables so
that they won'
Package: xcb
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
I get the following:
...
xcb-2.4/xcb.man
sed -n -e '/^\.SH COPYRIGHT/,/^\.SH/ {s/^\..*//;p}' xcb.man > Copyright
sed: 1: "/^\.SH COPYRIGHT/,/^\.S ...": extra characters at the end of p command
### execution
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything
(c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts
gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them up?
As long as you added a prefix or suffix to the gcc and g++ executa
cirdan: why did finkbugs apparently send this to fink-devel instead of
to Maintainer? Pkg was only added a day ago, so maybe finkbugs's pdb
is out of date?
Is finkbugs's pdb outdated, so does
th
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:31:40AM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Package: xcb
> Version: 2.4-1
[..
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
I think that there are other options hidden around somewhere, like
enabling the gnu objc runtime as well as the apple objc runtime,
should this be looked into?
I see
--enable-objc-gcenable the use of Boehm's garbage collector with
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Looks like --enable-threads=posix builds a libobjc-gnu.dylib ... gee,
that's obvious, I spotted that right away (NOT!).
Peter
That's the default I guess, since I've already got that lib. I went
ahead and checked in the gcc4 package if you want to give it a try (best
to in
On Feb 11, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
I don't really know, I'm hoping others will hop in on this thread. I
know Alexander Strange has been building gccs from the apple ppc
branch, maybe a fink gcc4 package should come from there?
Hmm - I'd like to hear about that. I doubt that gfor
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >Jeff Whitaker wrote:
> >
> >>I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything
> >>(c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts
> >>gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason t
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Can we get rid of the kernel's version-number in its installation
directory? If gcc builds OS-version-specific stuff, we have a package
portability problem...
dan
Dan: I haven't been able to figure out how to
11 matches
Mail list logo
