[Fink-devel] deborphan-1.0-11

2007-06-04 Thread Eric Christopherson
There's a small bug in the 'orphaner' script provided with deborphaner. It checks for whiptail or dialog in several bin directories (e.g. /usr/local/bin), but does not check /sw/bin. Thus, even though I had 'dialog' installed, it didn't find it. I just added a check for /sw/bin and it worke

Re: [Fink-devel] deborphan-1.0-11

2007-06-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 6/2/07, Eric Christopherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's a small bug in the 'orphaner' script provided with > deborphaner. It checks for whiptail or dialog in several bin > directories (e.g. /usr/local/bin), but does not check /sw/bin. Thus, > even though I had 'dialog' installed, it did

[Fink-devel] openmpi from tracker--feedback request

2007-06-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
The current build of openmpi from the tracker looked OK to me, but since there are some library structure changes (with symlinks to maintain compatibility) I wanted to solicit feedback from folks who use packages that depend on it: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=17

Re: [Fink-devel] openmpi from tracker--feedback request

2007-06-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > The current build of openmpi from the tracker looked OK to me, but since > there are some library structure changes (with symlinks to maintain > compatibility) I wanted to solicit feedback from folks who use packages > that depend on it: > > https://sourceforge.net/

[Fink-devel] I'd like to add krusader soon

2007-06-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
If nobody has any objections I'll add the krusader package from my experimental tree this evening (GMT-4). https://finch.finkdeveloper.net/svn/users/akh/experimental/3rdparty/finkinfo/kde/ -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink User Liaison/Documenter akh AT finkproject DOT org -

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

2007-06-04 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Hi, > > Given that we have now gcc42 in 10.4/unstable (and soon also in 10.4/ > stable), I wonder if we should declare the gcc4 package as obsolete. > > The gcc4 package in 10.4/unstable is based on the pre-4.2 snapshot > 4.1.

Re: [Fink-devel] openmpi from tracker--feedback request

2007-06-04 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 04 Jun 2007, at 16:54, Martin Costabel wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >> The current build of openmpi from the tracker looked OK to me, but >> since >> there are some library structure changes (with symlinks to maintain >> compatibility) I wanted to solicit feedback from folks who use

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP4/5 Packages

2007-06-04 Thread Chris Corbyn
I'm just looking through the submissions and I see that a (supposedly) working version of 5.2.0 was posted in December but never actually responded to. Would I submit my (5.2.3/4.4.7) files in the same way or do I need to be added to the developers list (Username: d11wtq)? A new dependency

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

2007-06-04 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Dan, On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Given that we have now gcc42 in 10.4/unstable (and soon also in 10.4/ >> stable), I wonder if we should declare the gcc4 package as obsolete. >> >> The gcc4 package

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

2007-06-04 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Given that we have now gcc42 in 10.4/unstable (and soon also in >>> 10.4/ >>> stable), I wonder if we

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP4/5 Packages

2007-06-04 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 for this time just send them to me, I'll review them and add them after I test the build and upgrade. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 4-Jun-07, at 2:35 PM, Chris Corbyn wrote: > I'm j

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

2007-06-04 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, On Jun 4, 2007, at 3:50 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, Given that we have now gcc42 in 1

Re: [Fink-devel] openmpi from tracker--feedback request

2007-06-04 Thread Jack Howarth
JF, Actually I think you have that a bit backwards. Currently the 1.1.5 openmpi packages already have /sw/lib/openmpi/libopal.0.dylib so this is a pre-existing situation. The openmpi 1.2.2 packages renames these as libopen-pal.0.dylib and I created a symlink for backward compatibility. However,

Re: [Fink-devel] Really making maxima-nox not use X

2007-06-04 Thread David R. Morrison
OK, here's an alternate version of gd2-nox and gnuplot-nox, using static gd2 libs: http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/experimental/dmrrsn/wxmaxima- project/ -- Dave On Jun 3, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > The maxima-nox package currently has an indirect dependency on X11