Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 03:49 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: > Pointing out only that, for the first time in memory, OpenOSX is > actually > shipping something that is more up to date than Fink and that Fink is > shipping a version of PHP w/a known security hole (which I failed to > mention-- so

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Alexander Strange
On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 04:09 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > PHP was maintained by Christoph Pfisterer. It is one of around 80 > packages > which still list Christoph as maintainer. We eventually need volunteers > for all of those. Run a 'fink selfupdate', then this to get the package n

[Fink-devel] passwd update

2002-03-08 Thread Finlay Dobbie
passwd has been updated, hopefully system preferences will no longer vomit all over / when you try to remove users. please could you all test, and I'll move it to stable ASAP. -- Finlay ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.s

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Bumgarner
Any effort is better than none... if a quick fix works, go for it. I wish I had more time to focus on this (and had the experience with PHP to do so effectively) On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 04:17 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: >>> I'll take a look at updating it, if someone is willing to test w

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread David R. Morrison
> > I'll take a look at updating it, if someone is willing to test what I do. > > I won't take over as maintainer of this package, though. > > I looked at it very briefly and it appears that the package is old enough > that it may be more productive to derive a new package based on a > combinat

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread David R. Morrison
Hmmm... the latest darwin-dev has a relevant post: Subject: apache_mod_php module in cvs From: Marko Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: darwin-development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PHP 4.2.0 is due to be released on March 22nd, ie. in two weeks. This will be the first PHP version with official Mac supp

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Bumgarner
I looked at it very briefly and it appears that the package is old enough that it may be more productive to derive a new package based on a combination of the old and on Scott Anguish's PHP articles at stepwise.com. b.bum On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 04:09 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > PHP w

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread David R. Morrison
PHP was maintained by Christoph Pfisterer. It is one of around 80 packages which still list Christoph as maintainer. We eventually need volunteers for all of those. I'll take a look at updating it, if someone is willing to test what I do. I won't take over as maintainer of this package, though.

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Bumgarner
Pointing out only that, for the first time in memory, OpenOSX is actually shipping something that is more up to date than Fink and that Fink is shipping a version of PHP w/a known security hole (which I failed to mention-- sorry about that). As I know *zero* about PHP, nor do I have time to d

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 07:13 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: > OpenOSX is shipping PHP 4.1.2, which fixes a number of bugs over > 4.0.6-- the current version in Fink. Your point? Oh, I guess you mean you want someone to update it. I think you just volunteered yourself, thanks! -- Finlay

[Fink-devel] PHP, OpenOSX, etc..

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Bumgarner
OpenOSX is shipping PHP 4.1.2, which fixes a number of bugs over 4.0.6-- the current version in Fink. ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-08 Thread David R. Morrison
It's true that you could change to rrdtool1 now. However, it is easier for backwards compatibility to not do that. If there are packages which depend on rrdtool at the moment, then they will continue to function normally even if you do the split. (OK, there probably aren't any in the case of rr

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial plitoffs code now in CVS

2002-03-08 Thread Benjamin Reed
Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >But right now, we have no way of really planning ahead for a > >version that's too high, like, if rrdtool version 2 is out. > > If you ever get an incompatible version, then you would change the > name of the -shlibs package to e.g. "rrdtool2-shlibs". Old p