[Fink-devel] #if (defined(__MACH__) && defined(__APPLE__))

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Hi all, Is this #if (defined(__MACH__) && defined(__APPLE__)) the standard way of determining whether C code is being compiled on MacOSX or is there some other preferred method? Thanks in advance, Erik -- +---+ Erik de Cas

[Fink-devel] ASM in C file ; porting from CodeWarrior -> OSX

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
] ; } Thanks in advance, Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ "If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?"

[Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
X but this still does fix the problems on my library. Cheers, Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ "I once worked for a company where

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
dn't want to apply against the ltmain.sh in my tarball. Any clues? Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ Microsoft : Yesterday's software running on today's ha

Re: [Fink-devel] ASM in C file ; porting from CodeWarrior -> OSX

2002-06-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
can convert the code, so if anyone knows how to do it, I would appreciate hearing from them. Regards, Erik -- +-----------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ &qu

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-08 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:48:18 -0400 "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might have to edit ltmain.sh by hand, in order to apply Dave's patch... Ouch. A bit ugly, but it worked :-). Thans to all. Erik -- +------

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-08 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:46:10 -0700 Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:27 PM +1000 6/8/02, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > >Ouch. A bit ugly, but it worked :-). > > Not at all. It is normal. There are so many differences in the > various libtool versions (

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
e patch, but picking apart "archive_cmds" was > too obtuse for the time I had available. :-( > > I applied the patch to this: > > http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz Great program! It would be nice to have that on OS X. Erik -- +----

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool :-(

2002-06-09 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 16:38:08 -0700 Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > I applied the patch to this: > > > > > > http://autogen.sf.net/data/autogen-5.3.8pre5.tar.gz > > > > Great program! It would be nic

[Fink-devel] CVS weridness

2002-06-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik -- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ "If you need a piece of paper and a pen to explain it, then its not bleedin' obvious" -- Erik's First Law _

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS weridness

2002-06-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 12:20:24 +1000 Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have 2 x86 Linux (Debian testing) machines and an iBook running OS X on > the same 192.168 network and a CVS repository on one of the Linux machines. > > Cvs logi

Re: [Fink-devel] getopt_long in 10.2

2002-07-10 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:45:51 -0600 "Justin Hallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > install gengetopt. It's GNU getopt with the getopt long function but it's Is this part of fink? apt-get can't seem to find it. Erik -- +----

[Fink-devel] Which version of Autoconf/Automake?

2002-11-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
-- +---+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ Windows: Proof that Microsoft has a roomful of monkeys with keyboards. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See th

Re: [Fink-devel] Which version of Autoconf/Automake?

2002-11-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
forgot about libtool. Whats the right version there? Thanks, Erik -- +-----------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +---+ `[Microsoft] are in the business of giving