[Fink-devel] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)] Re: ettercap? [and -ssl variants]
Hi, Sorry for the delayed reply... I've been pretty busy with Uni. I've run into that problem before. It has to do with the /sw/share/ettercap directory existing before ettercap is installed, which results in the symlink (contained in the package) not working. I've made a change to the packages to add a PreInst script, which will check if the /sw/share/ettercap directory exists, and if it does, remove it, which should clear the way for the package... I haven't committed it yet, because I'm working on adding in variants support so I can combine the ettercap and ettercap-gtk packages. On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the situation has changed. Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be nice to just have one package description file for all four variants... Thanks! On 17 Sep 2004, at 2:27, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Start of forwarded message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ettercap? References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 07 Sep 2004 12:49:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Lines: 40 Xref: blue.stonehenge.com outbox:35562 I didn't see any reply on this... no comment? Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Randal The most recent ettercap seems to be broken. Is it just me? Randal Trying even the first example of the manpage: Randal localhost:~ % sudo ettercap -Tp Randal ettercap NG-0.7.0 copyright 2001-2004 ALoR NaGA Randal Dissector ssh not supported (etter.conf line 66) Randal Listening on en1... (Ethernet) Randalen1 - 00:0D:93:8A:18:C8 172.16.70.100 255.255.255.0 Randal Privileges dropped to UID 65534 GID 65534... Randal Cannot open etter.dnsplugin ec_dns_spoof.so cannot be loaded... Randal 25 plugins Randal 39 protocol dissectors Randal 53 ports monitored Randal ERROR : 2, No such file or directory Randal [ec_manuf.c:manuf_init:126] Randal Cannot open etter.finger.mac Randal That looks like some major missing install stuff. But is it just me? Randal Should I retry building other stuff? I just did another rebuild, and it still does the same thing. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! End of forwarded message -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Fink-devel] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)] Re: ettercap? [and -ssl variants]
Jeremy Higgs wrote: snip On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the situation has changed. Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be nice to just have one package description file for all four variants... snip Yes. The -ssl variant _cannot_ be packaged in a single file unless your file will always live in the crypto tree. A good example would be my msmtp package. Which builds either with openssl as msmtp-ssl or with gnutls. Both Variants require the file to be in the crypto tree thus it is ok. IN you case you have a blah-ssl file which lives in the crypto tree and a blah.info whith all the variants you need/want that lives in the normal tree. -d --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)] Re: ettercap? [and -ssl variants]
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 07:22:32PM +1000, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the situation has changed. That is still the situation. Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be nice to just have one package description file for all four variants... You could use the same .info template with variants/etc., but instead of a single file with both -ssl options: Type: -ssl (boolean) clone the file and have each hard-code the desired -ssl value. So the crypto tree would have a .info with: Type: -ssl (-ssl) (or even just Type: -ssl) and the non-crypto tree would have: Type: -ssl (.) dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)] Re: ettercap? [and -ssl variants]
On 18 Sep 2004, at 22:42, Darian Lanx wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: snip On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the situation has changed. Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be nice to just have one package description file for all four variants... snip Yes. The -ssl variant _cannot_ be packaged in a single file unless your file will always live in the crypto tree. A good example would be my msmtp package. Which builds either with openssl as msmtp-ssl or with gnutls. Both Variants require the file to be in the crypto tree thus it is ok. IN you case you have a blah-ssl file which lives in the crypto tree and a blah.info whith all the variants you need/want that lives in the normal tree. -d Rightio. I figured as much! Thanks for the clarification! PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
