Re: [Fink-devel] symlinking to provide share/doc/%n okay?

2002-01-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman


On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 01:42  AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Well, to put it like that: there is currently no unstable 
> bindist. There is no infrastructure for one, either. So your 
> chance is 0% to get into an "official" unstable bindist, 
> obviously.
> You can of course make your .deb available from some FTP/http 
> site of your choice.
>
Yeah, while I am at it I'll ask my web host for free bandwidth :-)

Looks like people will have to build it and wait.

Thanks
Peter


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] symlinking to provide share/doc/%n okay?

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn

At 1:06 Uhr +0900 25.01.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>Hi,
>I am currently spending some time in gdb with gnucash-1.6.5...
>
>Anyway, is it okay to symlink %p/share/gnucash/doc tp 
>%p/share/doc/gnucash to provide the required docs? (I am asking 
>because gnucash doesn't seem to be that broken, so I'd hate to "fix" 
>it).
>
>Also, this takes a long time to build (2 hrs on my 500Mhz TiBk) I'd 
>be willing to install a clean fink in /sw and build a deb for it and 
>its dependencies. Is there any chance of maintainer submitted debs 
>making it into any kind of bindist for unstable packages?

Well, to put it like that: there is currently no unstable bindist. 
There is no infrastructure for one, either. So your chance is 0% to 
get into an "official" unstable bindist, obviously.
You can of course make your .deb available from some FTP/http site of 
your choice.





Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] symlinking to provide share/doc/%n okay?

2002-01-24 Thread David R. Morrison

"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I am currently spending some time in gdb with gnucash-1.6.5...
> 
> Anyway, is it okay to symlink %p/share/gnucash/doc tp 
> %p/share/doc/gnucash to provide the required docs? (I am asking 
> because gnucash doesn't seem to be that broken, so I'd hate to 
> "fix" it).

I think this is fine.  Another possibility is to just do something like

  mkdir -p %i/share/doc/%n
  ln -s %p/share/gnucash/doc/COPYING %i/share/doc/%n

i.e., the only thing that really *has* to be in %p/share/doc/%n is the
justification for the license field.

> 
> Also, this takes a long time to build (2 hrs on my 500Mhz TiBk) 
> I'd be willing to install a clean fink in /sw and build a deb 
> for it and its dependencies. Is there any chance of maintainer 
> submitted debs making it into any kind of bindist for unstable 
> packages?
> 

I'll let Max or somebody respond to this one.

  -- Dave



___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel