On Sep 19 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> Sorry but I have to correct this: we can not "merge back" with
> debian, as we never "split off" of debian. Fink is a completly
> independant project. We only happen to use the same lower level
> tools (dpkg/apt). Otherwise we are completly unrelated.
Ple
Max,
You are right. I stand corrected. Nevertheless, I'm suggesting that we
should consider pre-building unstable binaries to broaden the base of
unstable testers. If bandwidth to dl.sourceforge.net is an issue, then we
might consider utilizing the Debian mirror structure. Another distributio
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Robin Beech wrote:
> Is there another file manager for gnome that is working for anyone?
Midnight Commander (aka /sw/bin/gmc [gnomey] or /sw/bin/mc [console]) is
an old but more or less okay file management application. Last time I
checked it should have been part of the d
I've been down this same road with fink failing when it does a patch. I
traced it down for the packages it died on to a file it was trying to patch
but the file no longer existed. I'm not sure if this is your problem or not
but the result was the same. I had to reboot the entire system every ti
Hi,
> The x11 dependency most likely comes from tcltk.
Ok, so I installed all the packages that postgresql depends on and that
don't require X11. Here's the list of dependencies I'm left with:
postgresql -> daemonic libxml2 libxml2-bin libxml2-shlibs
postgresql-shlibs system-xfree86 tcltk tcl
At 13:35 Uhr -0400 19.09.2002, Brian Schott wrote:
>I agree we could use a binary unstable distribution like Debian. Any chance
>we could merge back with Debian
Sorry but I have to correct this: we can not "merge back" with
debian, as we never "split off" of debian. Fink is a completly
indepen
I agree we could use a binary unstable distribution like Debian. Any chance
we could merge back with Debian and leverage their auto-build and mirror
mechanisms? They have a few fledgling efforts on their web page for other
kernels (GNU Hurd, FreeBSD, NetBSD). It would eliminate the periodic bu
Hmm, finally the problem is not yet solved. I just had
a new crash a few minutes ago when compiling kdeveloper,
(using the /sw/bin/patch).
So this problem is still sometimes there. Very unclear !
Vincent.
--
---
Vincent BOUDON
Labora
Ben, Angel (et alia)
This problem was caused by a corrupt Developer Tools CD. Pacifist would
list the files but could not extract them. I downloaded the July Dev Tools
from Apple's website, and they installed just fine.
I would have thought that package files, even on a CD, had a check
>Maybe your path isn't right. What do you get from [tcsh or bash]:
>
> % printenv PATH
I get:
/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/Users/boudon/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin:/Users/boudon/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/X11R6/bi
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Vincent BOUDON wrote:
> Yes, I thought that. But when I tried the first time it took the wrong
> patch and crashed again ... I installed the new patch and then ran fink
> in a new terminal window, so I thought it should take the /sw/bin/patch,
> but apparently not. But maybe
Lord Lerkista wrote:
> Readline aren't supported in Jaguar??
It works, but you have to rebuild it under Jaguar, you cannot use the
one from 10.1 under 10.2. This is due to the split off of libncurses
from libSystem. If you build it yourself, you have to link it with the
-lncurses flag which wa
>Not necessary (and bad advice, anyway, for a variety of reasons).
>/sw/bin comes before /usr/bin in your PATH, so "patch" will be
>"sw/bin/patch" if it exists. That's how fink replaces the default
>commands, not by removing system files.
>
>--
>Martin
Yes, I thought that. But when I tried the
Vincent BOUDON wrote:
[]
> Just one point: apt-get install patch places a new patch in /sw/bin.
> Think to remove the one in /usr/bin.
Not necessary (and bad advice, anyway, for a variety of reasons).
/sw/bin comes before /usr/bin in your PATH, so "patch" will be
"sw/bin/patch" if it exists. Tha
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 07:25 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Rohan Lloyd wrote:
>
>> ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows
>> make[1]: *** [emacs] Illegal instruction
>
> Curiouser and curiouser: I rebuilt emacs21 on 2 jaguar systems. On one
> of them it built OK, on the other i
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 07:25 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Rohan Lloyd wrote:
>
>> ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows
>> make[1]: *** [emacs] Illegal instruction
>
> Curiouser and curiouser: I rebuilt emacs21 on 2 jaguar systems. On one
> of them it built OK, on the other i
16 matches
Mail list logo
