Re: [Fink-users] soprano-mac fails to build

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Howse wrote: > Now that redland is building for me, soprano-mac fails to build with the > following error. This is on a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6. By > the way, I looked in the directory /opt/fink/src/fink.build and ran a > find for

[Fink-users] soprano-mac fails to build

2009-04-15 Thread James Howse
Now that redland is building for me, soprano-mac fails to build with the following error. This is on a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6. By the way, I looked in the directory /opt/fink/src/fink.build and ran a find for the file libsopranoindex* and got no results. Any ideas? James /usr/bin/

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: gcc44-4.3.999-20090327 failed

2009-04-15 Thread Martin Costabel
Dominique Dhumieres wrote: [] > A few comments: > > gcc44 conflicts with malina; Yes, melina Depends on gcc43 and will perhaps Depend on gcc44 in the future (once I have had the time to make tests). It needs at runtime the same version of gfortran with which it was built itself, and I don't kn

Re: [Fink-users] Xdarwin missing

2009-04-15 Thread Victor Eijkhout
I've just upgraded to a new machine and therefore to 10.5. What has taken the place of XDarwin? I'll take a look at Xquartz. Victor. On 2009/04/15, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > If you're on 10.4 or earlier, XDarwin.app was the display server that > came with XFree86 or the X.org server

Re: [Fink-users] Xdarwin missing

2009-04-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Monic Polynomial wrote: > On 15/04/2009, at 06:31, Victor Eijkhout wrote: >> I've deleted XDarwin, Fink commander, and /sw, and reinstalled fink. >> No XDarwin executable. Where was that supposed to come from? Fink >> commander doesn't seem to know about it. > > > Wha

Re: [Fink-users] Xdarwin missing

2009-04-15 Thread Monic Polynomial
On 15/04/2009, at 06:31, Victor Eijkhout wrote: > I've deleted XDarwin, Fink commander, and /sw, and reinstalled fink. > No XDarwin executable. Where was that supposed to come from? Fink > commander doesn't seem to know about it. What OS X version are you running? You should find an X11 installer

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Howse wrote: > The command ls -l /usr/local/include/db* returns nothing on my system. > However I tried renaming /usr/local and then rebuilding anyway. The > result is the same error message as before. Actually, I found one thing that needs up

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread James Howse
dpkg -S /opt/fink/include/db4 db47-aes: /opt/fink/include/db4 find /opt/fink/include/db4 /opt/fink/include/db4 /opt/fink/include/db4/db.h /opt/fink/include/db4/db_185.h /opt/fink/include/db4/db_cxx.h The following db4* libraries are listed as installed by fink on my system. db41-shlibs db41-ssl-s

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Howse wrote: > The command ls -l /usr/local/include/db* returns nothing on my system. > However I tried renaming /usr/local and then rebuilding anyway. The > result is the same error message as before. Dang. What do these commands print? dpk

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread James Howse
The command ls -l /usr/local/include/db* returns nothing on my system. However I tried renaming /usr/local and then rebuilding anyway. The result is the same error message as before. James > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > >> James Howse wrote: >>> On a Mac Pro Intel runnin

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > >> James Howse wrote: >>> On a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6 the build for redland fails >>> with the following message. Any ideas what the problem is? >> >> Looks

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: James Howse wrote: On a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6 the build for redland fails with the following message. Any ideas what the problem is? Looks like a missing builddep; I'll take a look. This type of error is usually caused by h

Re: [Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Howse wrote: > On a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6 the build for redland fails > with the following message. Any ideas what the problem is? Looks like a missing builddep; I'll take a look. - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE

[Fink-users] redland build fails

2009-04-15 Thread James Howse
On a Mac Pro Intel running Leopard 10.5.6 the build for redland fails with the following message. Any ideas what the problem is? James /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/opt/fink/lib/system-openssl/include -I/opt/fink/include -I/opt/fink/include -I/opt/fi

[Fink-users] Xdarwin missing

2009-04-15 Thread Victor Eijkhout
I've deleted XDarwin, Fink commander, and /sw, and reinstalled fink. No XDarwin executable. Where was that supposed to come from? Fink commander doesn't seem to know about it. Victor. -- Victor Eijkhout, 512 471 5809 (w), 512 499 0504 (h) Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Tex

Re: [Fink-users] Unable to install slrn

2009-04-15 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:04:35AM +0200, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 05.04.2009 um 04:19 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > > > Dave Musicant wrote: > >> Hi - > >> > >> I'm trying to install slrn on stable, under OS X 10.4. I'm getting > >> the > >> following error: > >> > >> Can't resolve dependency "sl

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: gcc44-4.3.999-20090327 failed

2009-04-15 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
Hi, I don't know what caused this failure on intel OSX 10.5.6, but gcc44-4.3.999-20090407 built fine on ppc(G5)/intel(Core2Duo) OSX 10.5.6 and ppc(G4) OSX 10.4.11. A few comments: gcc44 conflicts with malina; obj(c|-c++) is broken on 10.5; libjava works with multilib on intel (but -m64 is broken

Re: [Fink-users] Unable to install slrn

2009-04-15 Thread Max Horn
Am 05.04.2009 um 04:19 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > Dave Musicant wrote: >> Hi - >> >> I'm trying to install slrn on stable, under OS X 10.4. I'm getting >> the >> following error: >> >> Can't resolve dependency "slang2-shlibs" for package >> "slrn-0.9.9-1" (no >> matching packages/versions f