Re: [Fink-users] Package (arb 20071207-1004) fails

2008-01-16 Thread Ben Hines
Fixed. -ben On Jan 16, 2008 4:03 PM, Matthew Cottrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the strangest problem compiling arb on Leopard 10.5.1 (iMac > PowerPC G5) with a fresh installation of Fink. > Package manager version: 0.27.10 > Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc > > arb seems to c

Re: [Fink-users] gnewspost

2007-12-10 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 9, 2007 9:51 PM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PM wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:18:36AM -0800, PM wrote: > >>> Is gnewspost being maintained? I contacted the package manager a few > >>> days ago, but I keep getting this error: > > I think he is still around, but not

Re: [Fink-users] flac-1.1.1-11 problem in stable

2005-02-25 Thread Ben Hines
Fixed -ben On Feb 24, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Jason J. Park wrote: id3lib4-dev now is in stable, but now I get the following error when performing a fink selfupdate and fink update-all. ... flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.am flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.in flac-1.1.1/obj/release/lib/ flac-1.

Re: [Fink-users] selfupdate-cvs failure not in FAQ's

2005-02-11 Thread Ben Hines
What exact fink version do you have? What is the output of: % fink --version Package manager version: 0.23.5.cvs Distribution version: 0.7.1.cvs One of the 'binary install' update methods for OS X 10.2 (even though you are on 10.3) listed on: http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/upgrade.php

[Fink-users] Re: Installing flac-nox-1.1.1-10: Patch Fails

2004-11-07 Thread Ben Hines
You don't need to email the list at all, only the maintainer is necessary. -Ben On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:25 AM, Emily Jackson wrote: The patch accompanying the new flac-nox package fails: sed -e 's,@PREFIX@,/sw,g' /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sound/ flac-nox.patch | patch -p1 missing header

Re: [Fink-users] Re: no sound with new esound :-(

2004-09-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Sep 10, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Ralf Höling wrote: Hi all! Am 08.09.2004 um 22:23 schrieb Mattia Vaccari: well, yes, I've run into _exactly_ (hence no error message pasting) the same problem with xmms after updating esound! I recompiled everything from sources but this didn't seem to help. Is ther

Re: [Fink-users] Request to upgrade unstable Gramps version

2004-07-15 Thread Ben Hines
I'm in england, so i'll have to try to update it over ssh/vnc. -Ben On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote: On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: It's completely appropriate to ask to increment a package to a newer upstream version. Sometimes the patches work between ver

Re: [Fink-users] can't install gramps

2004-06-03 Thread Ben Hines
On Jun 2, 2004, at 7:55 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: That's because nautilus-shlibs is only available in the unstable tree (which is why a binary isn't available). By rights, gnome-python2-py23 and therefore gramps should not be available in stable either, because of this. Anyway, you'll n

Re: [Fink-users] db3 does not install

2004-05-11 Thread Ben Hines
On Apr 23, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Apr 23, 2004, at 1:58 PM, Guy Lauquin wrote: [chamaerops:/sw/fink] guy% sudo ln -s /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11 -24_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/debs/db3_3.3.11-24_darwin-powerpc.deb Password: ln: /sw

Re: [Fink-users] Failed updating gramps to 1.0.3-11

2004-04-27 Thread Ben Hines
On Apr 27, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I tried to upgrade gramps to the current version 1.0.3-11. However, it fails due to an include file it doesn't find. I paste a part of configure, too, as there are some 'command not found'. I don't know if they are relevant: checking for pkg-co

Re: [Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released

2004-04-20 Thread Ben Hines
The cvs sources should build 0.5.3 unless i forgot to check something in which is possible. Yes i never tagged 0.5.2, oh well. IMO, providing CVS is enough. For open source principles, fine, but I don't see why one would want to use the finkcommander source tgz to install it. Anyway, I didn't r

Re: [Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released

2004-04-19 Thread Ben Hines
Why? -Ben On Apr 18, 2004, at 11:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Hines wrote: Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable. Hi Ben, would it be too much to ask to put a source

[Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released

2004-04-18 Thread Ben Hines
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable. http://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/history/ FinkCommander is a graphical user interface for the Fink software packaging system for Mac OS

Re: [Fink-users] new clamav release (was: Question about installing clamav)

2004-03-28 Thread Ben Hines
On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Phil Ershler wrote: I e-mailed the maintainer for clamav, asking about the possibilities of updating clamav to the latest release. I did not receive a reply. Is there a possibility of updating to the new releas

Re: [Fink-users] cloning fink installation to another machine?

2004-01-11 Thread Ben Hines
I believe we have fixed that problem a while back. Should work with fink 0.18.0. -Ben On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:02 PM, John Hurst wrote: G'day Mike, One caveat: just make sure you use the 'proper' rsync, and not the hfs version. I screwed my /sw up by (inadvertently) using the hfs version (duh)

Re: [Fink-users] Bonobo-activation fails to compile

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 30, 2003, at 9:35 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 30 déc. 2003, à 18:23, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: [] bonobo-activation-fork-server.c: In function `bonobo_activation_server_by_forking': bonobo-activation-fork-server.c:289: error: `LincWatch' undeclared [] Failed: comp

Re: [Fink-users] date-manip-pm581 -can't install, so can't do update-all

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Roberto Manuel Latorre wrote: [] dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/ date-manip-pm581_5.42a-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Date::Manip.3pm', whic

Re: [Fink-users] Broken libnet-pm dependency

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 30, 2003, at 1:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: William Hunter wrote: [] dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/ libnet-pm58 1_1.17-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Net::Cmd.3pm', which is also in pa

Re: [Fink-users] g77: why 3.4 ?

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 31, 2003, at 1:43 AM, Michel Peyrard wrote: I have having some difficulties compiling the plplot package and I noticed that g77 provided by fink is 3.4 while gcc of the Apple Developer tools is 3.3. There seems to be some inconsistency that could explain my problem. You need to start w

Re: [Fink-users] Warning prebinding not disabled

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:45 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: [] Are those warnings normal? Yes, it appears so. At first, I found them not very logical - they shouldn't say "because", but "although" - but apparently you have to read them as "prebinding not (disabled because of foo)"

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesnt recognize installed binary packages

2003-12-29 Thread Ben Hines
The binary distro is simply behind the source distro. This basically always the case. No more information is needed. One day we will add to fink the ability to hold packages at a certain revision, stick to binary packages via 'fink' command, etc, but not yet. -Ben On Dec 28, 2003, at 9:58 AM,

Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] fink-mirrors breaks selfupdate

2003-12-26 Thread Ben Hines
Try installing it with dpkg. sudo dpkg -i /sw/fink/debs/fink_0.17.1-1_darwin-powerpc.deb I must say i wish someone would have tested updating before making such a basic change to fink. -Ben On Dec 25, 2003, at 8:30 PM, Avram Dorfman wrote: The "fix recipe" below does not work for me either. S

Re: [Fink-users] minicom question

2003-12-24 Thread Ben Hines
This should be fixed now, i updated it to 2.1 and removed an outdated getopt patch which was causing the problem i suspect. -Ben On Dec 18, 2003, at 6:30 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: I *know* it was working at one point...but that was back when I was running 10.2. I didn't think to try it righ

Re: [Fink-users] Open GL libs cannot be found

2003-12-19 Thread Ben Hines
For fox looks like you just need --with-opengl=opengl There is a fink package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I'll move it over to 10.3 tree. -Ben On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:20 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It's probably not a Fink problem. You may have to tell the package's configure script where the di

Re: [Fink-users] Fwd: Bug #26567 [Opn->Bgs]: ld: Undefined symbols using --with-pspell=/sw

2003-12-19 Thread Ben Hines
Somehow the -laspell is not getting into the link line. First just try what it says here: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-general.php#compile-myself If that doesn't work, come back. -Ben On Dec 10, 2003, at 11:26 AM, GoochRules! wrote: Does here anyone have any ideas about this? It see

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: We were not talking about installed files, but about files avialable for installation. Also we do have to also trust dpkg's 'body count' if it says there is a later version of a package which is already installed (even partial)... it is fully

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: you get the impression that something is not right, whatever the interior mechanism is. You always ask "why does it try to install version x.y-z when it damn well knows that this doesn't exist?" I agree with you dude. Did I argue against this?

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 16, 2003, at 12:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Except that in the case at hand mutt was not installed at all. Only its config files were left, beause it was not purged. I would consider this at least counter-intuitive behaviour (not to say bug) that fink in this case refuses to install (a

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-15 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:16 PM, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: No idea, sorry. But you can try to do fink install mutt-1.4i-21 to force the installation of the new version. I did "fink purge mutt". This has solved the problem. Don't ask me why, but after that "

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-mixer on panther

2003-12-10 Thread Ben Hines
Run fink selfupdate. Current is 1.2.5-12 in the 10.3 tree. I just put it in stable as well. -Ben On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:38 PM, GoochRules! wrote: Failed: compiling sdl-mixer-1.2.5-11 failed --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveba

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-10 Thread Ben Hines
As far as i can tell, the dictionaries DON'T depend on the shlibs OR builddepend on the -dev. They appear to build and work fine just depending on aspell, which depends on its shlibs and dev. The shlibs and dev are for third-party apps that embed aspell. -Ben On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Michè

Re: [Fink-users] Gramps

2003-11-25 Thread Ben Hines
On Nov 25, 2003, at 8:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Okay, so you've got python2.2 and pygtk2-py22 installed. From a terminal window, what's the output of 'fink list pygtk' (without the quotes)? There may be some weird interactions if more than one version of pygtk is installed concurrently. gramps 0.

Re: [Fink-users] "Unable to parse the line"

2003-11-20 Thread Ben Hines
That is not unfortunate, that is very good. Unless you are trying to give yourself more support work, by letting people use whatever old rsync they may have and bug you when problems arise. :) Anyway its not fixed yet, CVS HEAD still calls 'rsync'. No full path. -Ben On Nov 20, 2003, at 12:39

Re: [Fink-users] Fink/OSX interactions

2003-11-20 Thread Ben Hines
On Nov 19, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Nolan J. Darilek wrote: I've done a "fink selfupdate" recently, and the behavior began again. My powerbook now prompts for a login and password when booted. Before, the situation was very cut-n-dry, as I'd installed This has nothing to do with fink and could not have

Re: [Fink-users] fink and giFT

2003-10-21 Thread Ben Hines
Those instructions are out of date. Just 'fink install gift'. -Ben On Oct 20, 2003, at 7:22 AM, Susheel Daswani wrote: Hi Fink Users! Has anyone successfully compiled giFT on OS X with some support from Fink? I found a website that details the process: http://www.gottsilla.net/gift/ . Unfort

Re: [Fink-users] porting question: darwin ld, how to handle GNU ld options

2003-09-06 Thread Ben Hines
I'd suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for this, or at the very least, fink-devel. But to answer - no. You will probably need to actually port the code. What package, why does it need these things? -Ben On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: I have a package that uses sev

Re: [Fink-users] rmail and postfix

2003-09-06 Thread Ben Hines
Uh, why the hell would we do that? It works fine. We have plenty of unmaintained packages. No reason to remove a perfectly working and popular package which might be missing some obscure rmail script. The postfix maintainer posted in july that he would update the package. I haven't heard oth

Re: [Fink-users] move it or lose it?

2003-08-30 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 04:17 PM, Jens Nockel wrote: packages will survive this. For example, scientific programs like R, Numeric Python, octave etc. may be compiled with ATLAS or Altivec support. 1. Those are about the only packages which do that (generally, fink packages do not and ar

Re: [Fink-users] master ftp problem...

2003-08-30 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 10:02 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: "master:master:master:master...", huh? This seems to have been the same problem. The thread doesn't offer a clear explanation of this phenomenon, but fink (the package) was changed on 13 Jun

Re: [Fink-users] problems building kde programs

2003-08-14 Thread Ben Hines
_Sm* is all from libSM, part of xfree86. What versions of xfree86 do you have installed? Apple's? Fink's? -Ben On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Kurt Fleschner wrote: Now, I'm stumped on whats causing all this to not build. Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks.

Re: [Fink-users] libffi for darwin/os x?

2003-08-14 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote: I was surprised to see that 'libffi' (foreign function interface) is not available as a fink module. Is there a reason for this, or just that no-one's needed / had the time to port it? Fink just includes what people care to contribute

Re: [Fink-users] will fink purge remove its changes made to Netinfo after an install of passwd?

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 05:20 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You wouldn't be able to remove passwd until you remove everything else, since it's a base package. I'm not sure if "fink purge" takes out the daemon users, but it should, by rights. base packages CAN be removed. Only 'Essential'

Re: [Fink-users] gnotime compile failing: used from dynamic library....not from earlier dynamic library

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:05 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote: nt. So here's why I'm stuck compiling it. I'm gettin a whole slew of errors like this: # symbol _Load_Device used from dynamic library /sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.dylib(ftxopen.lo) not from earlier dynamic library /sw/lib/libpangoft2

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since they do not work and it is fixable. -Ben On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:46 AM, jfm wrote: On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Fink-users] can't make fink believe stuff needs to be updated

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Geoff Smith wrote: I have fink installed, but only version 0.12.1-1, or 0.5.2 (not really sure about the numbering scheme). The results of a fink selfupdate follow: This was a known bug in fink 0.12.1. See http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/fix-upgrad

Re: [Fink-users] Installing Debian packages on Fink?

2003-06-29 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 01:16 AM, Jonas Steverud wrote: Something that struk me yesterday was that in Debian there are a lot of packages that doesn't contain any binaries, like the ispell dictionaries, and it would be nice if those where available in fink too. My question now is how much w

Re: [Fink-users] Need help installing gnupg

2003-06-24 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: At 3:30 PM -0400 6/24/03, sinclair44 wrote: On 6/24/03 3:05 PM, "Paul Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, I got a copy of the file I need from ftp.gnupg.ca. Where do I put it to make Fink think that it already has the file so it

Re: [Fink-users] New gcc 3.3 compatible with fink compiling?

2003-06-23 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: I'd like to know if it's advisable now to use the gcc 3.3 as default compiler right now or does it conflict with the way Fink operates? Michèle Many packages will not yet compile with 3.3, including apt. Additionally there are ABI c

Re: [Fink-users] fink and root privileges

2003-06-21 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Jerry Talkington wrote: If you need this feature, you could work on updating this patch--it's now a bit old. Also, you could help figure out how we should handle packages that need root privileges, like passwd (adding users), passwd and similar packages sh

Re: [Fink-users] sw_vers zombies after fink update-all

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: I've launched fink selfupdate-cvs at 5:33 am (UCT +2) today. Then fink update-all. I've never seen those sw_vers zombies before. fink update-all is not finished yet (kde compiling still in progress). Does somebody have any idea wh

Re: [Fink-users] how to modify a package

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 10:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all: I have a package on my machine that has a default value compiled in. I would like to change the default value, which involves modifying one line of source code. How can I interrupt the installation process so diff -u o

Re: [Fink-users] CVS note

2003-06-09 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: You're right. I went reading into it to write up a patch, and found it too. I've thought up several other ways to screw it up, but they won't work in this situation. While you are patching fink cvs commands, how about making it work if

Re: [Fink-users] where to define fink mirrors

2003-06-08 Thread Ben Hines
For sources, you can do it now. Update to fink 0.13.0 and add your URL to the file: /sw/lib/fink/mirror/master (see the other files there for the format) then run 'fink configure' and select MasterFirst, and select your site as the chosen mirror. -Ben On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 07:59 PM, V

Re: [Fink-users] Groff 1.19 and Fink

2003-06-08 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:30 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: Source-MD5: c12bf574120df33ec8c18d92703e099e DocFiles: BUG-REPORT COPYING NEWS PROBLEMS README -ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info +ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info CXX=g++

Re: [Fink-users] Groff 1.19 and Fink

2003-06-08 Thread Ben Hines
I'll resurrect the old package as 1.19 and remove vasi as maintainer since he doesn't want to it seems. -Ben On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It sounds like you just volunteered ;-) Actually, it looks like groff-1.19 works without doing any patching: I built

Re: [Fink-users] gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'

2003-04-12 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 03:52 PM, David Orlovich wrote: Something I noticed is that one of the -p options that (I think) autoconfig determined for gcc is `-pthreads' and I keep getting the error: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads' It is not an 'error'. It is a warning. Don't use the

Re: [Fink-users] problems with apt-get update

2003-04-12 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 03:44 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Donal Day wrote: Here is the fink version information. fink --version Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.2.cvs Is this part of the problem? No, this looks OK. I still don't know what version of the apt packa

Re: [Fink-users] looking for GNU-find .. ?

2003-03-27 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Fink has the findutils package that installs GNU find. I don't run it here, because it insists on installing anacron and daemonic which I don't want. Actually it just 'insists on' cron-service. (btw: the word is "Depends:" on, n

Re: [Fink-users] Update-all failure with arts

2003-03-25 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 04:02 PM, Tom Dove wrote: .. audioiocoreaudio.cc: In function `OSStatus PropertyListenerProc(long unsigned int, void*)': audioiocoreaudio.cc:611: warning: unused variable `UInt32 propertySize' audioiocoreaudio.cc:612: warning: unused variable `AudioDeviceID devi

Re: [Fink-users] gnome-python/gramps

2003-03-24 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 06:45 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 11:40 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On my system, glibtool is provided by libtool14. Install it if you don't have it, and rebuild it

Re: [Fink-users] gnome-python/gramps

2003-03-24 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On my system, glibtool is provided by libtool14. Install it if you don't have it, and rebuild it if you do. No, it isn't. /usr/bin/glibtool comes with the Developer Tools. Anyone who is missing it shoudl reinstall the december 200

Re: [Fink-users] rpm-4.0.4-1 failed to build

2003-03-21 Thread Ben Hines
Install the Java 1.4 SDK from connect.apple.com. This is the Java problem i mentioned a few days ago on the list. (it may need to go in the faq, until someone makes a java virtual package) -Ben On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 08:52 PM, Kow K wrote: A build of rpm-4.0.4-1 failed on Fink 0.5.1.

Re: [Fink-users] Compile fails for both apt-0.5.4-8 and dpkg-1.10.9-2

2003-02-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Paul McNabola wrote: I can't locate a CoreFoundation.h on my machine and wonder where it might be from. I have Dev Tools Dec 2002 installed on 10.2.4. Reinstall them, then, the install must not have completed. -Ben ---

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.5.1 problem

2003-02-21 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 01:27 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: fink rebuild nedit should do it. Or just "fink update-all", really. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexi

Re: [Fink-users] gtk-perl-pm failed to make (2)

2003-02-19 Thread Ben Hines
No, you should ignore those warnings. dpkg overwrites them at deb install time perl is confused because it sees the old versions under /sw while it is installing a new version into the deb root. If you rm them yourself you will remove the new versions! -Ben On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at

Re: [Fink-users] problems launching apps

2003-02-16 Thread Ben Hines
You probably need to wait a few minutes. It takes that long to launch. Really. -Ben On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: If everything is set up properly, then when you invoke /sw/bin/kword, (for example), you should get a bunch of messages in your terminal about

Re: [Fink-users] tetex testing needed

2003-02-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Enrico Franconi wrote: The following are the (many more) commands which are in GW tex but not in fink tetex: Lots of those things are in other fink packages. For example t1binary, t1ascii, etc are in the "t1utils" package. GW likes to spread anti

Re: [Fink-users] pine / uw-imapd incompatibility

2003-02-14 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 01:11 PM, Chris Devers wrote: Sorry if this is in the archives, I poked around but didn't see anything really related to this. Why is it that Fink's pine & uw-imapd (or uw-imapd-ssl) packages can't be installed at the same time? You can have a mail client

Re: [Fink-users] Libtool 1.4.2 and 1.4.3 C++ bundle linking problems

2003-02-08 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 12:54 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote: The problem with 1.4.2 seems obvious; the problem with 1.4.3 is that, no matter what I try to do (RangerRick suggested CC="c++") libtool uses gcc for linking. If I try to use -lstdc++, libtool 1.4.3 complains that it can't link

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries

2003-02-08 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 07:18 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: feature in Virex. The engineers used several existing pieces of open-source software to make their job easier, but they forgot/didn't know how/whatever to move the libraries to /Library/Application Support. Probably not good to

Re: [Fink-users] Need help with .info file

2003-02-07 Thread Ben Hines
-0.20.5-1 failed There seems to be some confusion about neon. It wants neon 18 and 23... Any ideas? Ken On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 05:37 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:14 AM, Ken Botwinick wrote: I'll update the package and try to add netrc support. Why not

[Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries

2003-02-07 Thread Ben Hines
This is very bad. Fink users, don't install this. Virex 7.2, free to all .mac members installs: /Volumes/Virex 7.2.dmg/Virex 7.2.pkg 328 % lsbom Contents/Resources/Virex\ 7.2.bom | grep sw ./sw40775 0/80 ./sw/lib40775 0/80 ./sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.6.dylib 100644 0/80945416 31

Re: [Fink-users] Need help with .info file

2003-02-07 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:14 AM, Ken Botwinick wrote: I'll update the package and try to add netrc support. Why not just email the maintainer? (me :) Should be in later... Well, for a couple a reasons. I'm new to this whole process, and I should understand how to do it manually in

Re: [Fink-users] Need help with .info file

2003-02-06 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 10:00 AM, Ken Botwinick wrote: Hi, I want to compile cadaver to include .netrc support. I did this in the past by adding --enable-netrc to the "/Volumes/Applications/sw/fink/10.2/stable/crypto/finkinfo/cadaver- ssl-0.19.1-12.info" file as so: ConfigureP

Re: [Fink-users] OpenSSL 097 seems to not exist?

2003-02-06 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 06:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting problem here. Unless something failed, I'm fully selfupdated. The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other packages using commands like 'fink update-all'. The -ssl stuff is broken curre

Re: [Fink-users] one more point of confusion

2003-01-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Michael Bovee wrote: Okay one more, I wanted to try to 'wget' some stuff from that there internet. Just to be sure I tried it in Terminal first and got 'command not found'. I figured this was not part of the default install anyway, so after messing

Re: [Fink-users] freetype breaks my package

2003-01-31 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 01:27 PM, James Gibbs wrote: I'm working to make a package for xplanet. I thought I was basically all finished until I discovered that it won't build if freetype is installed. Freetype2 alone is not a problem. The immediate problem is that FT_Library is not de

Re: [Fink-users] major problem with fink X11 perl script

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Hines
Aha, i see. You can fix that by updating the install_name in binaries that were built against the bad X11 libs. I'll enhance the script to fix those too. Will post when i get it working. Anyway - this problem is not "major" - major was the massive build failures apple's broken libraries caused

Re: [Fink-users] major problem with fink X11 perl script

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: In case folks haven't noticed, there is a major problem with the perl script to fix the shared lib names for the MacOS X X11 beta files. If you look at the log from update_prebinding on a machine that has had the perl script ru

Re: [Fink-users] update-all wants to install xfree86

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 02:46 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: That appears to be the case--I'm not sure if 2.0.13-6 required threads or not, but I don't have that info file anymore. A (complicated) procedure for setting up apple X11 with threaded support was posted on the list a few

Re: [Fink-users] Apple's X11 symbols

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 09:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On mercredi, jan 29, 2003, at 17:11 Europe/Paris, Hans Fuchs wrote: bash-2.05a$ g++3 $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -L/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/ -o glcube -lclanGL -lclanApp -lclanDisplay -lclanCore

[Fink-users] Proper list use

2003-01-29 Thread Ben Hines
If you want to respond to a post someone makes on the list, or ask for more help, please respond to the list. When you email people directly, you limit the amount of help you may receive. Additionally, noone else can benefit if the help goes only to you. Additionally, it is basically stealing

Re: [Fink-users] libpng warning

2003-01-28 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:22 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: The warning is confusing, because it refers to libpng, but the fix actually has to do with the imlib package. Until amaya can be updated, you should "downgrade" imlib as described on Fink's webpage. It was updated before y

Re: [Fink-users] mysql CLI errors

2003-01-28 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:39 AM, Justin Wright wrote: I recently upgraded to Jaguar, and subsequently upgraded fink. finkcommander shows readline 4.2a-5 and mysql 3.23.49-2 installed. Your fink update did not complete properly, those are 10.1 versions. Do all the steps on: http://

Re: [Fink-users] update-all error

2003-01-26 Thread Ben Hines
Actually i believe "fink update gnome-vfs-ssl".. -Ben On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Try "fink rebuild-gnome-vfs-ssl" -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Expe

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Fink-users digest, Vol 1 #1381 - 12 msgs

2003-01-25 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 01:07 PM, Bruce Tomlin wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 12:09 PM, Christian Schaffner wrote: How did you start it? With sudo safe_mysqld --user=mysql I created a StartupItem to start it with '/sw/share/mysql/mysql.server start', which runs safe_

Re: [Fink-users] Compile problems with guile

2003-01-25 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 05:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'm not sure where you got /usr/include/malloc.h, but it is not present on my system. I suggest that you move it out of the way temporarily (by renaming the file) and then try to compile guile again. It should not be "temp

Re: [Fink-users] Upgrading unreleased packages

2003-01-24 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 11:31 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Greg Howland wrote: I've installed a package using Fink but would like to upgrade it to a later version that has not been uploaded to the CVS repository. I've downloaded the tarball but I'm not sure about what to do from here.

Re: [Fink-users] Mutt and URL's in e-mail: how to launch an aqua browser?

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 06:28 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: On Jan 21 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: Rogério Brito wrote: BTW, as another question, is there any reason (lack of manpower, perhaps) on why the urlview isn't present in fink? You know, of course, the package request tracker

Re: [Fink-users] Proxy settings OK for Fink, not for FinkCommander

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 08:13 AM, H.Fagard wrote: At 10:57 -0500 23/01/03, Alexander Hansen wrote: Have you tried setting HTTP_PROXY et al. in the FC Preferences? See my first message: At 15:04 +0100 23/01/03, H.Fagard wrote: I have checked the proxy settings in Preferences/Downlo

Re: [Fink-users] LibUSB 0.1.7-1 update won't build

2003-01-22 Thread Ben Hines
Please send me your full libusb build log. (off list) -Ben On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 05:20 AM, lenny bruce wrote: For a long time now I couldn't get Speex 1.0beta3-2 or LibUSB 0.1.7-1 to update. Speex finally built tonight for some unknown reason but LibUSB is still failing: ld: Und

Re: [Fink-users] Problems with "restFP" and "saveFP"

2003-01-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Alexandre Enkerli wrote: I have no idea if this has to do with fink, but maybe I can find help here. Some packages I'm trying to install from source generate errors at make. Here's this error in the context of compiling the latest version of Apach

Re: [Fink-users] dpkg-1.10.9-2 failure

2003-01-20 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 11:15 PM, Gary Elshaw wrote: Anyone have any idea what's going on here? Usage: head [-options] ... http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#head -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Source

Re: [Fink-users] openjade crashlog

2003-01-18 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 09:14 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: While compiling linc-0.5.5, I've got an openjade crashlog and the package failed to build with: Any idea what should I do? No, its not related to those warnings. It seems to be a bug in openjade. This happens for everyone

Re: [Fink-users] problem with selfupdate

2003-01-18 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 04:37 PM, Philip Trauring wrote: My results: philip% head /sw/var/lib/dpkg/availble-old head: /sw/var/lib/dpkg/availble-old: No such file or directory philip% head /sw/var/lib/dpkg/availble head: /sw/var/lib/dpkg/availble: No such file or directory philip%

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling ant fails

2003-01-18 Thread Ben Hines
You should email these reports to the maintainer listed in "fink info ant", instead of the list. -Ben On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 03:06 PM, Isreal Packard wrote: My system: Mac OS X 10.2.3 (6G30) Power Mac G4 (version = 2.0) gcc (GCC) 3.1 20020420 (prerelease) Package manager version

Re: [Fink-users] Can't install new dpkg w/ cvs

2003-01-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 01:20 PM, Gary Olson wrote: I tried to remove xml-parser-pm (which requires removing some other perlmods first) thinking that I could then download and recompile this perlmod. Then I would try updating again. However, I can not remove it using apt-get, dsele

Re: [Fink-users] mpg123 problems

2003-01-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 04:57 AM, Marcus Bointon wrote: If anyone is installing mpg123, I think you should read this: http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq-200301/0137.html True, but it is highly unlikely that one would make a trojaned .mp3 that targets OS X powerpc, with

Re: [Fink-users] mpg123 problems

2003-01-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 07:44 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: cc -O -DDARWIN -Wall -O2 -DPPC_ENDIAN -DUSE_ESD -I/sw/include -c -o mpg123.o mpg123.c mpg123.c:9: header file 'stdlib.h' not found mpg123.c:10: header file 'sys/types.h' not found mpg123.c:12: header file 'sys/wait.h' not found

Re: [Fink-users] Trouble logging in

2003-01-16 Thread Ben Hines
Use Safari? :) -Ben On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: Hi-- I've been trying to log into the tracker for several weeks now and whenever I do, IE crashes (IE 5.2.2 on 10.2.3). Can someone tell me what to do to fix this...or is it being worked on? All My Best, J

  1   2   3   4   5   >