Re: [Fink-users] Unable to build terminator - autoheader is missing

Dear Michael, On 18.03.2015, at 17:19, Michael Hill wrote: > Trying to install terminator and I'm getting errors that autoheader is > missing. Any ideas on how to get fink to see autoheader? I had this error > initially without unstable resources, enabled unstable, went through the > whole

Re: [Fink-users] Fink package ddd on 10.9 fails to compile

Hi there, On 20.11.2013, at 13:13, Remko Scharroo wrote: > I have a problem with the Fink ddd package on 10.9. > Below is the error message. > Clearly g++ provided by clang behaves differently than on 10.8 where it > compiled fine. > 1) There is no more option -mminimal-toc > 2) It is (justifia

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-shlibs build failure on 10.8.4

On 23.07.2013, at 13:20, Christian Ebert wrote: > Hello, > > sdl-shlibs fail to build (link?) like so: This is a compile error (not a link error; but of course it doesn't matter much either way, an error is an error :-). The problem is apparently due to a change in XQuartz, and should only af

Re: [Fink-users] libtool2-2.4.2-2 can't be updated on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.5.8 because 'checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...' does not finish in finite time

Hi there, I just committed libtool2-2.4.2-3, please let me know if the problem persists with that. Cheers, Max -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat

Re: [Fink-users] libtool2-2.4.2-2 can't be updated on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.5.8 because 'checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...' does not finish in finite time

Hi Peter, Alexander, thank you, I now understand the problem and will commit a fix soon. Cheers, Max -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape

Re: [Fink-users] libtool2-2.4.2-2 can't be updated on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.5.8 because 'checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...' does not finish in finite time

On 12.07.2012, at 21:29, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 12.07.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Max Horn: > >> Also, did you have libtool2 previously installed or is this a first time? > > Libtool2_2.4.2-1 is already installed. That's odd then, since that should have experience

Re: [Fink-users] libtool2-2.4.2-2 can't be updated on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.5.8 because 'checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...' does not finish in finite time

Hi there, odd, as there is specific code in the libtool2.info for 10.4-10.6 to DISABLE gcj support and thus workaround this issue ... Also, did you have libtool2 previously installed or is this a first time? For reference, could you run fink -vml rebuild libtool2 and email me the resulting

[Fink-users] Vote for Fink to become "Project of the Month"

Dear Fink users, Fink has been nominated for becoming Project of the Month at SourceForge.net in July! Everybody with a twitter account can vote for us on -- so, please consider doing so to help us win! As a nice bonus, Fink would be the first project to be Project of t

Re: [Fink-users] Bug: sed compiled by fink gives incorrect results on 10.7

Dear all, sorry for chiming in so late, I should have done so earlier, being the maintainer of the GNU sed package in Fink. Now, I am not sure if the "git team" and "sed team" referred to here are the upstream authors or the Fink package maintainers... But in any case, let me mention what I kno

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] passwd PostInstall issues

Dear Derek, thanks for the report, I think I spotted and fixed the cause of this issue. But let me point out one thing, lest people get confused about it: There is absolutely no difference between "fink install FOO" and "fink update FOO". The "update" command is simply an alias for "install", a

Re: [Fink-users] bash-completion 1:1.3-1 regresses wrt space escaping

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there! Am 28.04.2011 um 19:55 schrieb Benjamin Reed: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 4/28/11 10:15 AM, Christian Ebert wrote: >> The latter being rather useless. Is this behaviour change >> intended or did it just come

Re: [Fink-users] pan on fink 64-bit

Am 14.03.2011 um 16:59 schrieb PNM: > Hi everyone, > > Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved anytime soon? Yes, for a suitable definition of "soon". I am currently moving (and have been since the weekend), so bear with me. Bye, Max > > One thing I forgot to add is that I am also us

Re: [Fink-users] can't install gmime24

Just did a brief check: As far as I can tell, pan is the only package depending on gmime24. If that is true, then I would propose as a quick first step to revision gmime24 up, adding --disable-mono to its configureparam. After this quick action, we can work on a gmime24-mono package. Jack? C

Re: [Fink-users] can't install gmime24

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08.03.2011 um 22:45 schrieb Alexander Hansen: [...] >>> I'm going to deactivate gmime24 for 64-bit, >> >> I'd really prefer if we removed the mono bindings from gmime24 instead and >> put these into a separate gmime24-mono package. >> >>> and

Re: [Fink-users] can't install gmime24

Hi there! Am 08.03.2011 um 19:18 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 3/8/11 11:25 AM, PNM wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> After updating today, I keep getting this error when I try to install >> gmime24 in the process of upgrading pan: >> >> [pMa

Re: [Fink-users] windowmaker buld fonts error

Hi there, I committed a new revision of windowmaker to the unstable tree last night. Please give it a try and let me know if it solves the issue for you. Cheers Max Am 04.08.2010 um 01:21 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/3/10 5:23 PM, Richar

Re: [Fink-users] grep-2.5.4-1 fails to build

Am 07.02.2010 um 10:36 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Gary K Olson wrote: > [] >> Making install in po >> /./install-sh -c -d /sw/src/fink.build/root-grep-2.5.4-1//sw/share >> make[1]: /./install-sh: Command not found > > I get the same crash on 10.5.8. > > This looks like a bug in the package source

[Fink-users] SDL-image & SDL-mixer prereleases

Hi there, due to various issues on Mac OS X and elsewhere, there will be yet another round of update for SDL image & mixer. All issues I know about in those *should* be gone, but it would be really good if this was tested on some other systems besides my 10.5/x86/32bit install. In particu

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Hi there, thanks to everybody who tested sdl-1.2.14-5. Based on the positive feedback, it is now in CVS. I'll wait a few days; if I hear nothing bad, I'll push it out to stable. Cheers, Max -- Come build with us! The

Re: [Fink-users] snns compile issue

Hi there, rev 12 of snns hopefully fixes building on 10.6/64; it also resolves the odd replicated configure params, and for the first time ever, installs the man pages as intended ;). I noticed that there is a version 4.3 of SNNS now, but don't dare updating it as I am not using SNNS anymor

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Hi everybody, the SDL folks just released something which looks like a proper fix to the issues reported on this thread. It would be nice if somebody could test the attached sdl.info & sdl.patch on x86_64 systems, ideally on both 10.5 and 10.6. Tests on other systems (including PPC 32/64bit

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Am 21.10.2009 um 15:04 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > Max Horn wrote: >> Am 21.10.2009 um 01:44 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: >>> Max Horn wrote: >>>> FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this >>>> issue, feel free

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with ddd package on 10.6

Am 21.10.2009 um 04:06 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > JonAlf Dyrland-Weaver wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am running Snow Leopard on a MacBook Air, and am having a nagging >> problem while installing certain packages. I am using a fresh install >> of fink and when I try to install ddd I get the following

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Am 21.10.2009 um 01:44 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > Max Horn wrote: >> FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, >> feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you >> are interested in the resolution or want to

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Am 21.10.2009 um 01:44 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > Max Horn wrote: >> FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, >> feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you >> are interested in the resolution or want to

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you are interested in the resolution or want to contribute to solving it: Cheers, Max Am 21.10.2009 um 00:30 s

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

Am 21.10.2009 um 00:30 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > The new release of sdl 1.2.14 fails on 10.5/x86_64. It builds fine > on 10.5/32bit. The previous 1.2.13-svn4819 also built fine on both > architectures. > > This is the build error: > > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc-4.0 -g -O

Re: [Fink-users] dosbox build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

(And also a *full* build log would be helpful... OK, but that's enough posting-from-work for today ;) Cheers, Max -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you nee

Re: [Fink-users] dosbox build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

Aha, actually, I may have been slightly to quick with my reply ;). I see that 0.73 *does* already contain the x64 dynrec (I thought that it had been added only after that release). So it might be more a matter of detecting the target CPU properly. If somebody with a 64bit system is willing t

Re: [Fink-users] dosbox build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

Hi there, just noticed this email, sorry for the late reply... Anyway, see below for my actual reply :) Am 29.09.2009 um 13:01 schrieb monipol: > On 28/09/2009, at 16:02, Stefan Bruda wrote: >> Dosbox fails to build for me (on 64-bit), apparently because the >> precision of various integer typ

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*)

Am 26.09.2009 um 21:02 schrieb Stefan Bruda: > Hi, > > While installing pygame-py25 I get stuck on sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12, whose > build fails. On a first look it appears like a missing header but I > did not have the time to dig deeper. Any advice is appreciated. This > all happens on a 64-bit fi

Re: [Fink-users] Unable to install slrn

Am 05.04.2009 um 04:19 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > Dave Musicant wrote: >> Hi - >> >> I'm trying to install slrn on stable, under OS X 10.4. I'm getting >> the >> following error: >> >> Can't resolve dependency "slang2-shlibs" for package >> "slrn-0.9.9-1" (no >> matching packages/versions f

Re: [Fink-users] recent build failure with xchat-2.8.6-1

Fix committed. Cheers, Max - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open S

Re: [Fink-users] XChat fink update-all fails

Am 25.09.2007 um 09:50 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Sean Lake wrote: >> Hello all: >> I got this error when running fink update-all : >> Can't resolve dependency "gtk+2-shlibs (>= 2.10.0-1)" for package >> "xchat-2.8.2-1021" (no matching packages/versions found) >> Exiting with failure. >> Here's t

Re: [Fink-users] Build issue with debconf-1.4.51-1017

Hi, after reviewing the problem and some research, this seems to me to be an issue caused by problems inherent to those versions of dpkg and debconf, as the build problems occur with plain vanilla make 3.81, too; on the other hand, debian has been using make 3.81 for a long time now witho

Re: [Fink-users] Build issue with debconf-1.4.51-1017

Hi folks, thanks to the pointer. This sounds not so nice. I'll investigate if there is a known fix (for make, dpkg, anything). Once I know more about the issue, I will get back to you and make a proposal as to how to resolve this (update/fix make, update/fix dpkg/debconf, downgrade make vi

Re: [Fink-users] Packaging pidgin?

Am 06.06.2007 um 04:51 schrieb Gregory Seidman: > I'm CC'ing Max Horn, package maintainer for gaim (and gaim-ssl), on > this > message. It seems that pidgin (the renamed gaim) has released > version 2.0.1 > and I'd love to see it packaged for Fink. Max, are y

Re: [Fink-users] sed fails to build

Am 28.12.2006 um 07:50 schrieb Claus Atzenbeck: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> I'll CC the maintainer anyway. Not building without gnu sed installed >> is a bug in the sed package that needs fixing. > > A general question on fink's gsed: I had /sw/bin/gsed installed, but > app

Re: [Fink-users] Ethereal

Fixed in CVS. Max --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! htt

Re: [Fink-users] USB printing with cups in an IBook

Am Samstag, 08.03.03 um 01:52 Uhr schrieb Ulises Mora Alvarez: OK. I'm sorry. Well, I'm working whit Mac OS X 10.2.4 and I'm trying to plug in an HP Laser Jet 6L printer in one of the USB ports. Every time I try to plug the printer, the Jaguar Printer Manager complains about a "non know printe

Re: [Fink-users] xemacs-21.5.9-4 failed to build

Am Freitag, 07.03.03 um 00:46 Uhr schrieb fortepianissimo: My system setup: Apple's X11 (most recent beta, with the dev package), xaw3d, lesstif (both are the most up-to-date packages). Here is the last few lines of the build output: There is already a bug report open for this issue: https://sou

Re: [Fink-users] irssi-0.8.6 ssl support?

Am Freitag, 07.03.03 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello fink-users, I've just subscribed to this mailing list. As the first thing I want to say a BIG THANK YOU to fink developers for they great work!! I've just a question... it's possibile to define some ./configure --options by ha

Re: [Fink-users] Slow Package Listing: Fink 0.12.0

At 13:14 Uhr -0500 28.02.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: Have you tried running "fink index"? That changed my list time from 73 to 11 seconds. There is apparently a bug in the 0.12.0 release (and in CVS) that causes the fink package database to not be cleaned properly, unless you manually force a

Re: [Fink-users] my contrib. works Darwin

At 14:57 Uhr +0100 28.02.2003, plumber wrote: http://almisr.online.fr/openjaguar/ Regards Why the heck are you sending this here? Is this some sort of attempt to get people to install backdoored software? You are not making a very professional impression by sending out an advertisign mail with

Re: [Fink-users] OS X v10.2.3, v10.2.4 stability

At 15:05 Uhr -0800 25.02.2003, Chris Timmons wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if my mirrored-door G4 has a hardware problem. It crashes reliably if I get the load average above 2 for any length of time. What does this have to do with fink? The machine runs fine just surfing the web; I notice the pr

Re: [Fink-users] Iperf fails - missing tar.gz

At 13:34 Uhr -0500 10.02.2003, Luke Gill wrote: curl -f -L -s -S -O http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/iperf-1.6.3-source.tar.gz curl: (22) The requested file was not found ### execution of curl failed, exit code 22 Downloading the file "iperf-1.6.3-source.tar.gz" failed. My selfupdate-cvs was

Re: [Fink-users] OpenSSL 097 seems to not exist?

At 21:04 Uhr -0500 06.02.2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting problem here. Unless something failed, I'm fully selfupdated. There were some issues in the transition to the new openssl revision. For now crypto is locked down, i.e. most package won't build in it. Issue should be resolved i

Re: [Fink-users] Fink Commander.crash.log

At 10:48 Uhr -0500 30.01.2003, Michael Bovee wrote: To maybe help would-be troubleshooters -- Here's the crash.log that FC generated. I was in the process of compiling at the time. Sorry to just spew all this stuff out, but I frankly don't know which parts might troubleshooting clues. Hrmm...Th

[Fink-users] Re: The damn Tenon Conpiracy

At 19:04 Uhr -0500 24.01.2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 11:18 AM, some conspiracy nut wrote: They probably had it running already just sitting around for fun and they gave it to us when they saw a bully in the marketplace. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SHUT YOUR MOUTH.

Re: [Fink-users] evolution dies in configure.

At 13:24 Uhr -0600 24.01.2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to install evolution. I'm in version 0.5.1.cvs, with the Dec 2002 dev tools. The message I get is: checking if ctime_r wants three arguments... no checking for gethostbyname_r... no checking for db3 compiler flags... -I/sw/inclu

Re: [Fink-users] Proxy settings OK for Fink, not for FinkCommander

At 15:45 Uhr +0100 23.01.2003, H.Fagard wrote: Thanks Max for your reply. At 15:31 +0100 23/01/03, Max Horn wrote: Hence when FinkCommander launches "apt-get", then "apt-get" inherits the env of FC which contains no HTTP_PROXY etc. But how come the proxy settings are sho

Re: [Fink-users] Proxy settings OK for Fink, not for FinkCommander

At 15:04 Uhr +0100 23.01.2003, H.Fagard wrote: Hi all, I have been using for some time a former version of FinkCommander (0.3) in a MacOS X.1.5 environment, through a firewall, without any problem. I have now installed Fink 0.5 and FinkCommander 0.4.3 on another partition, under MacOS X.2.2. I

Re: [Fink-users] Will Apple give Fink a hard time?

At 1:19 Uhr -1000 23.01.2003, Brendan Lane Larson wrote: Max, I agree that people need to back up their statements. I disagree that this topic is moot on the Fink list. In the form it was discussed, yes it was and is inappropriate. I will not tolarate people behaving in this way on the list (

Re: [Fink-users] Will Apple give Fink a hard time?

At 12:03 Uhr -0800 22.01.2003, lenny bruce wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Andrew Hartung wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 06:27 AM, lenny bruce wrote: X11 on Mac OS X began as a hobby-like interest in the possibilities of OS X that Tenon illegally hijacked with cri

Re: [Fink-users] need make 3.80

At 14:24 Uhr -0500 20.01.2003, Gregory Seidman wrote: Max Horn sez: } At 9:34 Uhr -0500 20.01.2003, Gregory Seidman wrote: } >I have a build system that depends on some of the features in GNU make } >3.80, but MacOS X 10.1.5 (which I am still running) and Fink (even } >unstable) still

Re: [Fink-users] need make 3.80

At 9:34 Uhr -0500 20.01.2003, Gregory Seidman wrote: I have a build system that depends on some of the features in GNU make 3.80, but MacOS X 10.1.5 (which I am still running) and Fink (even unstable) still have only 3.79.1. I'd like to make a .deb from the latest make source so that I can manage

Re: [Fink-users] Mutt and URL's in e-mail: how to launch an aquabrowser?

MAND launch -l '%s' launch also has many other nifty features, for example to open a picture with GraphicConverter, you can do: launch -c GKON MyPicture.jpg Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer --

[Fink-users] Attention: CVS currently OFFLINE

Dear Fink users, due to technical problems, SourceForge.net had to temporarily disable anonymous CVS access. In particular, this means that "fink selfupdate-cvs" will not work in the next few days. Sorry for the inconvenience, but we can't do much about it right now. More details can be found

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.2.1

e.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Attachment converted: Data:signature.asc 32 (/) (009872DB) Ugh... I think it is a bad sign when your signature is 10 (!) times the size of your message. Max -- ------- Max Horn Sof

Re: [Fink-users] WHY WHY WHY

At 23:46 Uhr +0100 22.12.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: Max Horn wrote: Uhm, if you would have first asked before starting to rant, you would have found out that it's easily possible to install fink on any drive, not just the boot drive. Max, I am pretty sure that the binary installer

Re: [Fink-users] WHY WHY WHY

Uhm, if you would have first asked before starting to rant, you would have found out that it's easily possible to install fink on any drive, not just the boot drive. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Deve

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.0.7-2 SSL support

ox if you compiled the package... hm Unfortunately I am currently not in a position to perfrom a proper test, as this iBook doesn't have much space on it's HD left, certainly not enough to build & install evo. Need to wait t

Re: [Fink-users] Which Darwin package kernel?

all. Secondly, if you read the descriptiong, it says: "virtual package...". Stress on "virtual". It's merely a place holder, so there is no need to worry :-) Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer

Re: [Fink-users] [OT]: the real meaning of Fink :)

Fink is no aKronym? Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your w

Re: [Fink-users] dillorc

ug report instead of hoping that somebody in charge might read your mail by chance. Don't get me wrong, I am grateful for well done bug reports, but your effort go for nothing if you don't report them properly :-/ Max -- ------- Max Horn Soft

Re: [Fink-users] Fink t-shirt?

u want to sell them, or what? I was thinking I fink Therefore I can What do you guys think? We "Fink Different" of course :-) Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Fink-users] Roughly when will Fink 0.5 be released?

At 16:03 Uhr +0100 12.11.2002, Xavier HUMBERT wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max Horn) wrote : In the meantime, the source installation does work and is pretty stable (at least for me and mostly anybody else I talked to). It works for me too, but last time I checked version it was 0.49-cvs. Did

[Fink-users] ATTENTION: member only posting

still post from all your accounts but get the mail from the list only once. Sorry for the inconvenience. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:max@;quendi.de> phone: (+49) 6151-

Re: [Fink-users] Roughly when will Fink 0.5 be released?

.0, but this really depends on how fast we manage to move stuff to stable etc. In the meantime, the source installation does work and is pretty stable (at least for me and mostly anybody else I talked to). Cheers, Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer

Re: [Fink-users] Gnomemeeting and fink

tracker. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:max@;quendi.de> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [Fink-users] 10.2.1 bootstrap.sh install fails - gnutar isntpresent...

OS X and which version of Fink is that? Did you install the developer tools for your system (needed for Fink) ? Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:max@;quendi.de> phone: (+49)

Re: [Fink-users] compiling ethereal-0.9.7-1 failed

I submitted a changed patch for ethereal into CVS, I hope it will fix this build issue. Please test and tell if it helps or not. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-

Re: [Fink-users] compiling ethereal-0.9.7-1 failed

d this now, but also multiple have it working (e.g. me... otherwise I wouldn't have put it in CVS, obviously :-) I have no clue yet as to what's going on, but am looking into it. Max -- -

Re: [Fink-users] libsdl compile failure

to consider reinstalling the dev tools. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Fink-users] troubles editing mailing list options

x27;d be able to do. You can either do it via email, or use another browser than IE (which has a bug when it comes to certain secure pages), or use IE and change the "https" to "http" in the unsubscribe URL. Max -- ------- Max Horn Soft

Re: [Fink-users] Odd fink behavior

like weird behavior to me, maybe a bug? Possible. Try if a "fink index" fixes the problem. If it does, I think I know what the problem is, if not, then I'm inclined to believe it's a problem local to your system. Cheers, Max -- --- M

Re: [Fink-users] unsubscribe problem

error "security failure. date decryption error." > >any ideas? Either use a different web browser, or just change the "https" to "http" in the above URL. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn So

Re: [Fink-users] Question about "make -j 2"

odify the .info file you want to use in advance to use this command instead of the normal make. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ---

Re: [Fink-users] Package Managers on OS X, Darwin Ports too?

peak for the Fink project, so this would be a bad >idea. Well, several important members of the Fink team are in very close contact to them already. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49)

Re: [Fink-users] Package Managers on OS X, Darwin Ports too?

some of us are also active in the OpenDarwin efforts. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http:/

Re: [Fink-users] Problem Installing textutils-2.1-1

My mistake, I'll release a fixed revision ASAP. Sorry. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email i

Re: [Fink-users] GFTP and Pan "Sans 10" error: [workaround found]

export GDK_USE_XFT=1 (for bash) >or setenv GDK_USE_XFT (for tcsh) > >sounds like this will be fixed in the next release of >gtk2 I have put a pan 0.13.0 package into unstable that contains this work around, at least for now. Cheers, Max -- ---------

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] error compiling dlcompat

st fink version" is very vague (latest binary release? Or from CVS? Maybe even using unstable?), and essential zero information. Instead please tell us what the output of this command is: fink --version Finally, please do *not* cross post to multiple mailing lists. Cheers, Max --

Re: [Fink-users] New (binary) releases of Fink? - Merge back with Debian?

ebian. Fink is a completly independant project. We only happen to use the same lower level tools (dpkg/apt). Otherwise we are completly unrelated. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Fink-users] CUPS

patch/.info file around. Max -- ------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell ph

Re: [Fink-users] gcc 2.95 on jaguar

would be very nice). Also, now that we have a "clean" gcc version for OS X, maybe the Pascal/ADA/... frontends are going to be released on OS X, too? (I know that at least for ADA they are working hard on it, though I dunno what their current status is) Max -- ---

Re: [Fink-users] Proxy help

ideas? I know I >had this working at one point, but can't seem to get it working now. Did you prefix this with http:// was the fink configure command tells you to do? Max -- --- Max Horn Software Dev

Re: [Fink-users] Remove package

deleting .debs you want to keep). So far for me it worked always just perfect, but you use it on your own risk (I didn't document it yet because I had not enough tester feedback so far). Max -- --- Max Horn Software

Re: [Fink-users] Please test: xfree86-base/xfree86-rootless inunstable, XFree86 CVS

No I have to correct myself after re-reading the definition, it *is* a misfeature :-) OK enough nitpicking and back to testing the fix. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-

Re: [Fink-users] Please test: xfree86-base/xfree86-rootless inunstable, XFree86 CVS

ncomplete feature (or not as well designed feature as it should be), not a bug nor a misfeature :-) Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --

Re: [Fink-users] Please test: xfree86-base/xfree86-rootless inunstable, XFree86 CVS

o cope with this situation. I am working on a fix for this which will be in 0.10.1, which I plan to release ASAP. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 unstable broke my KDE :(

of the main problems crating a unified xfree86 packages back then was exactly this, IIRC. I am not sure if there is any viable solution to this. issue. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

I have put code into CVS that makes it rebuild the package database upong selfupdate only if the fink package was updated. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-

Re: [Fink-users] fink cleanup

At 16:30 Uhr +0200 11.08.2002, mathias meyer wrote: >dear finkers > >in the fink_0.9.12-1 days there was the discussion about a fink >cleanup command, which was then put into fink_0.9.12.cvs on the 9th >of june by max horn (see the corresponding mail to this list). i >made

Re: [Fink-users] trouble updating packages

le-pm manually? Are you sure your install of it is correct? The normal way for this is to install the Fink storable-pm package. Maybe you can temporarily remove that custom install of storable pm and see if that helps? And if you are still manually setting PERL5LIB, try to comment that out for

Re: [Fink-users] trouble updating packages

e system by calling 'dpkg --remove'. The current implementation has several fundamental flaws. It only works on packages Fink knows about (i.e. .info file is present), and it doesn't check dependencies but rather leaves that work to the dpkg tool (luckily this usually poses no problems

Re: [Fink-users] trouble updating packages

Is it possible that you once had unstable activated, but not anymore, and never rebuilty your package index since then? Also note you can do this: fink list --installed or short: fink list -i Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email

Re: [Fink-users] trouble updating packages

reiver > >fink selfupdate-cvs doesn't seem to do anything with these, nor does >updating or rebuilding them. Is there a problem? selfupdate only updates the package list and some of the core packages. If you want to update other packages, use fink update PACKAGE or fink upd

Re: [Fink-users] Selfupdate-cvs hates me. (was re: Fink 0.10)

Possibly the kerberos framework. I guess we might consider changing our cvs package to be kerberos-less if it turns out there are people which need kerberos in CVS, we can just make a cvs-kerberos pacakge. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer

Re: [Fink-users] Selfupdate-cvs hates me. (was re: Fink 0.10)

hing in the code that could cause this. Maybe somehow your "storable-pm" package was removed, that would explain why it is so extremly slow. Just "fink install storable-pm" if you are not sure. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer

  1   2   3   4   >