Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Otherwise use printf or /bin/echo -n instead of echo -n. Or bash instead of
sh.
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a link
to bash - hm, a separate copy, actually - and
Ben Abbott wrote:
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin
Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Otherwise use printf or /bin/echo -n instead of echo -n. Or bash
instead of
sh.
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a link
to bash - hm, a separate copy, actually - and behaves just like bash
does in 'sh mode' on other platforms, including honoring -n
On Sep 1, 2009, at 5:15 AM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr
wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a link
to bash - hm, a separate copy, actually - and behaves just like
bash
OK, that confirms that what Martin said is true of Snow Leopard, which
I don't think was in question. But he said it had been true since
Leopard, and that's the part that I think is in error. If it wasn't
changed until SL, that would also explain why the current problem
didn't show up until SL.
Mark J. Reed wrote:
OK, that confirms that what Martin said is true of Snow Leopard, which
I don't think was in question. But he said it had been true since
Leopard, and that's the part that I think is in error. If it wasn't
changed until SL, that would also explain why the current problem
Mark J. Reed wrote:
OK, that confirms that what Martin said is true of Snow Leopard, which
I don't think was in question. But he said it had been true since
Leopard, and that's the part that I think is in error. If it wasn't
changed until SL, that would also explain why the current problem
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I don't know how you do this, but it's not what I get on Leopard. Are you
sure you aren't running Tiger?
Yes, it's Leopard. Specifically, as I said in my earlier message, 10.5.8.
Or do you set or unset the environment
On Tuesday, September 01, 2009, at 10:29AM, Martin Costabel
costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
OK, that confirms that what Martin said is true of Snow Leopard, which
I don't think was in question. But he said it had been true since
Leopard, and that's the part that I think is in
Ben Abbott wrote:
[]
On Snow Leopard ...
sh-3.2$ env COMMAND_MODE=unix2003 sh -c 'echo -n asdf'
-n asdf
sh-3.2$ env COMMAND_MODE=legacy sh -c 'echo -n asdf'
asdfsh-3.2$
OK, so this is still the same as on Leopard. What has changed is the
behavior of TeXShop, it seems to me. It doesn't
On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
[]
On Snow Leopard ...
sh-3.2$ env COMMAND_MODE=unix2003 sh -c 'echo -n asdf'
-n asdf
sh-3.2$ env COMMAND_MODE=legacy sh -c 'echo -n asdf'
asdfsh-3.2$
OK, so this is still the same as on Leopard.
I followed the instructions to switch to snow leopard. I've deleted
all Fink's .la files and have rebuilt the packages when the missing
files were needed when running an update-all. All went rather well.
Now I'm having trouble with tetex.
With the simple latex document ...
Ben Abbott wrote:
I followed the instructions to switch to snow leopard. I've deleted
[]
Default Command: Latex
Default Script: Tex + DVI
Tex: altpdflatex
Latex: altpdflatex
Contemporary versions of tex use simpdftex instead of altpdftex, whose
development stopped ca 2002.
When I
More POSIX conforming than POSIX requires would seem to be an
oxymoron, if not a paradox. And POSIX explicitly allows echo -n.
Does the builtin echo in sh have any way to suppress a newline? Maybe
the venerable \c?
On 8/31/09, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
I
On 8/31/09, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
I followed the instructions to switch to snow leopard. I've deleted
[]
Default Command: Latex
Default Script: Tex + DVI
Tex: altpdflatex
Latex: altpdflatex
Contemporary versions of tex use simpdftex instead of
Mark J. Reed wrote:
More POSIX conforming than POSIX requires would seem to be an
oxymoron, if not a paradox. And POSIX explicitly allows echo -n.
Yes, that's what I mean. Back in the early days of Leopard, when people
complained about the missing -n in sh's echo, Apple said it is because
of
On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
More POSIX conforming than POSIX requires would seem to be an
oxymoron, if not a paradox. And POSIX explicitly allows echo -n.
Yes, that's what I mean. Back in the early days of Leopard, when
people complained about
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin
Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Otherwise use printf or /bin/echo -n instead of echo -n. Or bash
instead of
sh.
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a link
to bash -
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Otherwise use printf or /bin/echo -n instead of echo -n. Or bash instead of
sh.
OK, now I'm confused. On my Leopard box (10.5.8), /bin/sh is a link
to bash - hm, a separate copy, actually - and behaves just like bash
19 matches
Mail list logo
