> Thanks again Vlad for clarification.
>
> One more clarification, is it Ok, to use differenct connection object to the
> same DB simultaneously.
As much as your HW allows :)
Regards,
Vlad
--
Live Security Virtual C
Thanks again Vlad for clarification.
One more clarification, is it Ok, to use differenct connection object to the
same DB simultaneously.
Regards,
Mann
--
View this message in context:
http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/fbclient-Deadlock-in-ISC-event-wait-tp4631165p4631184.html
Sent from the
Le 31/05/12 22:05, Denys Khanzhiyev a écrit :
> In fact it does not work yet. See issues on gihub.
it is fixed, but it is not the place to discuss about it
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cov
31.05.2012 22:25, Denys Khanzhiyev wrote:
> I wanted to ask if it is safe to attach in one thread and then query from
> another?
Yes, it is.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event wi
I wanted to ask if it is safe to attach in one thread and then query from
another?
I am using fbclient2.5 with mine nodejs lib and have strange issues.
NodeJS uses thread pool so my asynchrnous call may go into different thread
each time and from time to time my app just hangs
(i.e. some call to is
In fact it does not work yet. See issues on gihub.
2012/5/31 Leyne, Sean
> Henri,
>
> > I am doubtful, I do not understand these results.
> > Why it is faster to use one connection with small data size ?
>
> I do not agree with your testing analysis/methodology...
>
> When testing using an empt
Gouping error on deleting
-
Key: CORE-3862
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3862
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Environment: Windows (desktop machine)
Make it possible to encrypt database
Key: CORE-3861
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3861
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Alexander Peshkov
--
This
Henri,
> I am doubtful, I do not understand these results.
> Why it is faster to use one connection with small data size ?
I do not agree with your testing analysis/methodology...
When testing using an empty database the timing values are so small that any
small different gets magnified -- for
Hi,
I have finally made a node.js driver for firebird, so I connect to
directly to fb on the network protocol asynchronously.
I was not very comfortable at the beginning, I was expecting it will
not works, because fb have not pipelining support (cf: pipelining 11 Apr
20112).
but it works anyway
Trace API: Faulty database filter crashes server
Key: CORE-3860
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3860
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
Aff
> by "accident", I discovered that a faulty database filter in a trace
> configuration can crash the server. Tested with a few days old Firebird
> 2.5.2 Snapshot SC 64-bit on Windows.
>
> The used database filter doesn't make sense, but because it crashes the
> server, I thought reporting here
On 05/31/12 07:30, mann1402 wrote:
> Thanks a lot Vlad for quick response.
>
> Sorry for missing information.
>
> fbclient version is 2.1.1.17910 in Windows 2k3 Service Pack 2 x86 processor.
>
> Also i am using SQLAPI library to connect to Firebird. If possible, can you
> please elaborate "manuall
> Thanks a lot Vlad for quick response.
>
> Sorry for missing information.
>
> fbclient version is 2.1.1.17910 in Windows 2k3 Service Pack 2 x86 processor.
2.1.4 was released a while ago and 2.1.5 is expected soon. Even if there
was some
bug in old 2.1.1 - it is impossible to fix it there.
Hello,
by "accident", I discovered that a faulty database filter in a trace
configuration can crash the server. Tested with a few days old Firebird
2.5.2 Snapshot SC 64-bit on Windows.
The used database filter doesn't make sense, but because it crashes the
server, I thought reporting here make
>> what's needed to create a warning trace event in context of the
>> CORE-3539 addition? How does a WARNING output look like. The example in
>> the tracker is only for ERROR AT.
>
> WARNING output looks like ERROR with "WARNING" instead of "ERROR" :)
Thought so, but I wasn't entirely sure. ;
> what's needed to create a warning trace event in context of the
> CORE-3539 addition? How does a WARNING output look like. The example in
> the tracker is only for ERROR AT.
WARNING output looks like ERROR with "WARNING" instead of "ERROR" :)
You can look at CORE-3690 or CORE-3801, fo
Hello,
what's needed to create a warning trace event in context of the
CORE-3539 addition? How does a WARNING output look like. The example in
the tracker is only for ERROR AT.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Live Security Virtual
18 matches
Mail list logo
