I also don't think installation, that only copies dll to GAC, makes much
sense. But if it's not difficult, there can be still two packages,
installation and zip (or whatever) - it is common practice, isn't it? And
yes, ddex-installation automation would be of great importance, because many
guys do
On 3/6/08, Daniel Rail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, is it the DDEX setup that can cause the following error when
> trying to add a ASP.NetWebService to a Distributed System solution:
DDEX setup isn't doing anything with machine.config.
PS: Keep thread.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop
Hi,
At Thursday, March 06, 2008, 3:22 PM, Jiri Cincura wrote:
> OTOH for DDEX it would be nice to have fully automated installation,
> importing registry keys etc. No doubt.
Actually, that's the one I was thinking of, but made the error in
referring to the FirebirdClient.
But, is it the DDEX s
Very good news that you work on this project after Carlos gone. Thank
you! Hope i'll try new version over few days on my new project :-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual
On 3/6/08, Daniel Rail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> At Thursday, March 06, 2008, 11:22 AM, Marvin Cook wrote:
>
> > Jiri,
>
> > While I agree that most developers have the capability to unpack and add
> the
> > elements to the correct place, it is an area that prone to error. One o
Hi,
At Thursday, March 06, 2008, 11:22 AM, Marvin Cook wrote:
> Jiri,
> While I agree that most developers have the capability to unpack and add the
> elements to the correct place, it is an area that prone to error. One of
> the things a computer is good at is doing tedious things correctly o
Jiri,
While I agree that most developers have the capability to unpack and add the
elements to the correct place, it is an area that prone to error. One of
the things a computer is good at is doing tedious things correctly once it
has been trained (programmed). To me, it makes more sense to tra
Today, during msi installation building, I was wondering, whether
FirebirdClient needs installation. From my POV it's mainly for
developers, so, I hope, they are able to download some archive unpack
and add it to right place, isn't it? (In fact it can be easier to do
this with non-installation pack
Fixed bugs can be found in tracker. It's my first release on SF, so if
something isn't working, report it and wait. :)
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.
Hello *,
the new version of FirebirdClient (ADO.NET Data Provider) is available
for download: http://firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=files&id=netprovider
.
It's mainly a bugfix release. Work on Entity Framework support still continues.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/ji
10 matches
Mail list logo
