Hi, At Thursday, March 06, 2008, 11:22 AM, Marvin Cook wrote:
> Jiri, > While I agree that most developers have the capability to unpack and add the > elements to the correct place, it is an area that prone to error. One of > the things a computer is good at is doing tedious things correctly once it > has been trained (programmed). To me, it makes more sense to train the > computer once and let it do the work than make all the users master the > tedious stuff -- again. I have to agree with Marvin. The new developers to .Net and Visual Studio might prefer a full automatic install. Also, it seems easy to make a mistake, and if something isn't working right in VS after making all the manual changes that are required. It might be hard to find what you did wrong. As an example, I know I can't see any problem with the configuration settings that I entered manually, but VS2005 is still telling me that I did something wrong with installing Firebird ADO.Net, when I try to create some of the enterprise solutions that Microsoft provides via their Guidance packages. I just want to see what they are and in which kind of project that I might use them, but for now, I can't. I do have the proper GUID copied from the GAC to those locations that I had to edit manually. So, I wonder if a fully automated install into VS would avoid those problems, that I'm having. Also, I'm just starting to learn C# in VS2005 and VS2008. But, I've been a Delphi developer for 13 years and using Firebird since the first version. -- Best regards, Daniel Rail Senior Software Developer ACCRA Solutions Inc. (www.accra.ca) ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
