No. not using *any* RAD tools in addition to what is offered by
.net/C#/VS
> Are you using DevExpress XPO ?
> I had a similar problem, because FbErrorCollection does not implement
> ICollection.
--
Monitor your
Until version 2.7.0 implement only ICollection (no generic)
Since version 2.7.7 implement only ICollection
2012/11/21 Jiri Cincura
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Oliverio Girondo
> wrote:
> > FbErrorCollection does not implement ICollection.
>
> namespace FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Oliverio Girondo wrote:
> FbErrorCollection does not implement ICollection.
namespace FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient
{
#if (!NET_CF)
[Serializable, ListBindable(false)]
#endif
public sealed class FbErrorCollection : ICollection
{
--
Jiri
Are you using DevExpress XPO ?
I had a similar problem, because FbErrorCollection does not implement
ICollection.
2012/11/21 André Knappstein
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM, André Knappstein
> > wrote:
> >> As far as I understood this is because MS has put the classes required
> >>
Ahh, that's about the attribute that was moved. Not about XML.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure f
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM, André Knappstein
> wrote:
>> As far as I understood this is because MS has put the classes required
>> for "Extension" into another namespace in 4.5 than it was in 4.0
> I don't think MS did that. It would break the application even from compiling.
Okay, it
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM, André Knappstein
wrote:
> As far as I understood this is because MS has put the classes required
> for "Extension" into another namespace in 4.5 than it was in 4.0
I don't think MS did that. It would break the application even from compiling.
--
Jiri {x2} Cinc
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:29 PM, André Knappstein
> wrote:
>> It turned out that MS moved XML stuff around libraries and so you
>> will get completely another exception instead of the expected
>> FBException.
> ???
ahem...
I will try to reproduce it again if you need more det
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:29 PM, André Knappstein
wrote:
> It turned out that MS moved XML stuff around libraries and so you
> will get completely another exception instead of the expected
> FBException.
???
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | h
> ... and you have to download appropriate build.
Aah! Ye! Now I see...
This posting also helped me find one thing I chased without success
the whole day.
I blindly installed the new 3.x provider on each machine.
Using "only" .net 4.0 - and not the current 4.5 - I also have
Thanks.
Xavi Codina
2012/11/20 Jiri Cincura
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Oliverio Girondo
> wrote:
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/files/firebird-net-provider/3.0.2/NETProvider-3.0.2.0.7z/download
> >
> > DLL requires a higher version to 2.0
>
> There's no version for .NE
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Oliverio Girondo wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/files/firebird-net-provider/3.0.2/NETProvider-3.0.2.0.7z/download
>
> DLL requires a higher version to 2.0
There's no version for .NET 2.0, at least .NET 3.5 is required and you
have to download ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
