Hello,
> Strange stuff from firebird I am hoping to get some insight on...please bear
> with me while I describe the problem!
>
> I've run into a problem with a firebird installation that is using a 3rd
> party report viewer to display crystal reports from a firebird db on client
> PCs...this i
Hello Bob,
>>> 1): The most obvious thing according to the header page is a very
> large
>>> gap between the oldest active transaction and the next transaction.
> This
>>> means, you have a long-running/stuck transaction. If you are lucky,
> you
>>> can go into the MON$TRANSACTIONS table and check
Strange stuff from firebird I am hoping to get some insight on...please bear
with me while I describe the problem!
I've run into a problem with a firebird installation that is using a 3rd party
report viewer to display crystal reports from a firebird db on client
PCs...this is a windows environ
Thomas -
-Original Message-
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Steinmaurer
>> 1): The most obvious thing according to the header page is a very
large
>> gap between the oldest active transaction and the next transaction.
Alexey -
>> Alexey Kovyazin [mailto:a...@ib-aid.com]
>> Seems like you do correct things, but do you check that sweep is
really successful?
>>
>> Look at the transactions' markers log in IBTM (IBSurgeon
Transaction Monitor), gathered from Profitmed
>> database (120Gb, 400 clients, 2mln trans
At 05:34 AM 18/09/2012, John Wilk wrote:
>Hi all I have a client who has software wich runs a test in which the software
>collects data. What my client would like to do is be able to store each
>test's data in an independent database located on a network share.
Not on a network share...that is
Hello Bob,
> currently at 90GB. We have sweep disabled, and each night run gbak,
> gfix --sweep, as well as reindex all tables via a script.
>
Seems like you do correct things, but do you check that sweep is really
successful?
Look at the transactions' markers log in IBTM (IBSurgeon Transactio
Hi Bob,
> I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
> with a single hard drive for the operating system, and a 3 disk raid 5
> array for the database. We have one database on this machine, which
> is a dialect 1 database that was started on IB6.0 many years ago,
> curren
Thanks Paul, it worked! To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
From: paul.mer...@almexa.ro
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:50:02 +0300
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Membership provider, hash passwords, login
On 2012.09.17 5:45 PM, Vasilis .. wrote:
>
Hi all I have a client who has software wich runs a test in which the software
collects data. What my client would like to do is be able to store each test's
data in an independent database located on a network share. This is a little
beyound me and something I had never really thought about i
On 2012.09.17 5:45 PM, Vasilis .. wrote:
>
>
>
> Greets, anyone has come up with this problem: In a ASP.NET website i
> develop, using the membership provider and having hashed passwords in
> the database the user cannot login If i change the password storage to
> "clear" the login works fine.
The Jaybird team would like to invite developers and users of Jaybird to
fill out a survey on your use of Jaybird (Firebird JDBC driver). You can
find the survey at http://infopoll.net/live/surveys/s36021.htm.
The results of the survey will be used to decide where to focus
development of the up
I am trying to install Firebird 2.5.2 CS i386 RC1 in they Debian squeeze,
but it does not start. And I do not see the cause of the problem. Has
somebody had this problem?
Best Regards.
=
|| ISMAEL ||
=
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:45:22 +0300, "Vasilis .."
wrote:
> Greets, anyone has come up with this problem: In a ASP.NET website i
> develop, using the membership provider and having hashed passwords in
the
> database the user cannot login If i change the password storage to
"clear"
> the login works
> On 2012-09-17 13:07, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it might be related to CORE-3398, but I'm not sure. Any chance
>> to give 2.5.1 or 2.5.2 RC1 a try?
>
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Looks like there's something wrong with
> my security2.fdb (it was upgraded from previou
Greets, anyone has come up with this problem: In a ASP.NET website i develop,
using the membership provider and having hashed passwords in the database the
user cannot login If i change the password storage to "clear" the login works
fine. Any idea how to solve this or is it a known bug? Than
I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
with a single hard drive for the operating system, and a 3 disk raid 5
array for the database. We have one database on this machine, which
is a dialect 1 database that was started on IB6.0 many years ago,
currently at 90GB. We ha
On 2012-09-17 13:07, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> Perhaps it might be related to CORE-3398, but I'm not sure. Any chance
> to give 2.5.1 or 2.5.2 RC1 a try?
Thomas,
Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Looks like there's something wrong with
my security2.fdb (it was upgraded from previous versions o
Hello Tomasz,
> I'd be very grateful if someone could repeat the scenario described
> below and confirm I'm not daydreaming (should take about 1 minute). I've
> tested it on FB 2.5.0.26074 CS (Linux 32 and 64 bit).
>
> According to
>
> http://www.firebirdsql.org/refdocs/langrefupd25-security-sql-u
Hello,
I'd be very grateful if someone could repeat the scenario described
below and confirm I'm not daydreaming (should take about 1 minute). I've
tested it on FB 2.5.0.26074 CS (Linux 32 and 64 bit).
According to
http://www.firebirdsql.org/refdocs/langrefupd25-security-sql-user-mgmt.html
an
20 matches
Mail list logo
