hi all
i've found some spots and i would like to resume there here becouse maybe
will help some Others.
1) there are lot of discussions around web about problems wtih windowsDomain
controller , active directory etc, i dont know for my inability or maybe
becouse often the answers seems
Hi Mark
it is possible to use and external usb drive to try a test?
i were reading lot of documentats (if i am not wrong , also some official FB
papers) where is specified to do not use for DB integrity in case of disaster
any write cache options
for now , on the server , obviusly ,
Hi Louis
yes true, with fiew connections i do not risk big troubles about it , but as
for now , i am just making some smal test writing blob fields on an empy db and
on a w2008 active directory server and i get 10x times operation slower then my
client
i know i need a support designing the
On 18 Dec 2014 17:32:40 -0800, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Louis
yes true, with fiew connections i do not risk big troubles about it ,
but
as for now , i am just making some smal test writing blob fields on an
empy db and on a w2008
Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
1024 concurrent connections,
2048 since V.2.5.3.
At 08:32 p.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
wrote:
I had missed that this had been backported to 2.5 :)
Or up-ported to 3.0? ;-)
On 07 Nov 2014 03:42:44 -0800, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Based on your link below, you are confusing the specific problems of
running on an active directory server with a problem with the windows
filesystem cache on 64 bit windows. An issue
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Odp: [firebird-support] FB server installation a nd concurrent
users limits on Windows Server
Hi Mark
thank you very much! your answer is very detailed
so :
Based on your link below, you are confusing the specific problems
Hi
i am new to databases and i am going to choose Firebird.
Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are some
already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were starting to
ask if is there any limit about the number of concurrent Clients that could
On 06.11.2014 20:22, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
Hi
i am new to databases and i am going to choose Firebird.
Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are
some already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were
starting to ask
On 6-11-2014 20:22, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
i am new to databases and i am going to choose Firebird.
Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are
some already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were
starting to ask if is there
At 11:34 a.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
wrote:
Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
1024 concurrent connections,
2048 since V.2.5.3.
Helen
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:39:45 +1300, Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
At 11:34 a.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
[firebird-support] wrote:
Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
1024
Hi do you use it also on a windows server system with an active WINDOWS DOMAIN
CONTROLLER ?
Hi there,
Hi do you use it also on a windows server system with an active WINDOWS
DOMAIN CONTROLLER ?
I used to run Firebird 1.5 databases on domain controllers, and it
worked fine. The databases did not reside on the same disk as the
active directory database though.
Issues with Windows
14 matches
Mail list logo
