Message from John Colier
Hi all,
This is interesting, as it brings up some ancient issues that continue
to roil philosophy. I think that C.S. Peirce has the best answer to
these puzzles (and does not eliminate the wonder). For his (realist)
pragmatacism
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the particular. Kierkegaard
was not at all happy with this. What I am trying to say (quoting Octavio
Paz) is
Participants are reminded the rule of only two messages per week!!
---Pedro
Rafael Capurro escribió:
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the
Dear John,
The reference you cited looks like essential reading and I have ordered it.
Thank you for calling it to our attention.
I believe, also, that the conventional view of meaning leads to its erasure,
and this exactly why a Derridean view of writing (and speech) is required in
which
