Dear Karl,
your analysis about Wittgenstein does not take into account the second
Wittgenstein, who repudiated his own idea from the Tractatus.
I think, in touch with Carnap on other issues, that the use of the terms
"symbol", "signal", "marker", "information" into scientific sentences does
Dear Karl and FIS colleagues,
Yes, the Number Theory is very important basis!
But, I think, there is no need to number every word.
Because ... All words are already numbered
We have published large monograph named
“Natural Language Addressing”
where we outlined this idea and presented the
Using the logical language to understand Nature
The discussion in this group refocuses on the meaning of the terms
“symbol”, “signal”, “marker” and so forth. This is a very welcome
development, because understanding the tools one uses is usually helpful
when creating great works.
There is
Xueshan -- I think one can condense some of your insights hierarchically,
as:
In a system having language, information seemingly may be obtained in other
ways as well. It would be a conceptually broader category. Thus (using the
compositional hierarchy):
[information [language [signal]]]
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: "Jose Javier Blanco Rivero"
Fecha: feb 10, 2018 9:35 AM
Asunto: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on
the cateogry theory
Para:
Cc:
Dear Xueshan,
Thanks for sharing your interesting
Dear Colleagues,
I have read the article "The languages of bacteria" which Gordana
recommended, and has gained a lot of inspiration from it. In combination
with Sung's comparative linguistics exploration on cell language and human
language, I have the following learning feelings to share with