.net/model-of-evolution/
>[2] Ji, S. (2012). The Isomorphism between Cell and Human Languages: The
> Cell Language Theory <http://www.conformon.net/?attachment_id=1098>. In:
> *Molecular
> Theory of the Living Cell: Concepts, Molecular Mechanisms, and Biomedical
> Appli
hers, New Jersey.
________________
From: Fis on behalf of PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN
FERNANDEZ
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 8:39 AM
To: JOHN TORDAY; fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture
head>
Dear John and FIS Colleagues,
Many thanks for this opening text of the NY Le
Just a few short comments in response to Mark & John:
We definitely must reconsider the logic of biology! To start with, we must
abandon the Aristotelian prohibition of circular causality, as Alicia
Juarrero suggests. Life is all about recursion! Then there's the inherent
dialectical nature of liv
ntil June
20th 2018
*From:*Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *PEDRO
CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ
*Sent:* 5. januar 2018 14:40
*To:* JOHN TORDAY ; fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture
head>
Dear John and FIS Colleagues,
Many thanks for this opening
Dear John,
Thank you very much for this - a great way to start the new year!
I'd like to ask about "communication" - it's a word which is
understood in many different ways, and in the context of cells, is
hard to imagine.
When you suggest that “the unicellular state delegates its progeny to
inte
Dear Professor Torday,
thank you for your insightful analysis of the complex system which is
genetics. Your viewpoints cover from the molecular, cellular, physiological
level up to that of cosmic changes affecting the whole of the Earth. Your
work is truly a tour d’horizon of the subject.
Rando
*
* free promotional access to all focused issue articles until June
20th 2018
*From:*Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *PEDRO
CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ
*Sent:* 5. januar 2018 14:40
*To:* JOHN TORDAY ; fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture
head&g
Torday's work generally boils down to a concern for PREADAPTATION in
organic evolution. This is a material necessity. Preadaptation has been
ignored by the neoDarwinian evolutionary biologists, who have viewed their
task to concern the dynamics of natural selection (even in simple models).
So evo
Dear John and FIS Colleagues,
Many thanks for this opening text of the NY Lecture. Indeed
you have presented us an intricate panorama on one of the most obscure
scientific problems of our time: the central theory of biology. As you say,
we find with astonishment that there is literally no cell
Dear FIS Colleagues,
Happy New Year to everybody!
Following ourtradition we are going to hold the New Year Lecture:
"REFLECTIONS ON EVOLUTION THEORY"
It will be imparted by:
JOHN S. TORDAY
Professor of Evolutionary Medicine
Harbor-UCLAMedical Center
Los Angeles
It will be posted, at hi
Dear FIS Colleagues,
The 2017 New Year Lecture will be entitled:
"A Curious Story"
It will be imparted by:
Otto E. Rossler
University of Tuebingen
It will be posted in a few days, at the author's convenience. In the interim,
discussants are kindly requested to take a rest, stop the exchanges,
Dear FIS Colleagues,
During these early days of 2016, we will have the customary New Year Lecture,
entitled:
THE NEW FORCES OF HISTORY
Imparted by:
Howard Bloom
Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of
History
Member: New York Academy of Sciences, American
Caro Marcus Abundis,
il non-duale o l'uni-duale modello non è costituito da rumore (entropia) &
segnale, ma da interpretazione & informazione (neg-entropia). E se vogliamo
approssimarci di più alla realtà liberamente creata dobbiamo analizzare
l'uni-trialità: entropia (rumore), interpretazione, neg
Hi Terry – and “first-time greetings“ to FIS colleagues,
First, Terry, thank you for your continued effort with this contentious
topic. It is truly necessary and worthwhile “heavy lifting.“
Second, in reading all prior postings I am drawn to your 30 Jan. note:
> . . . I haven't felt that the s
ssex;
>
> Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ. <http://www.zju.edu.cn/english/>,
> Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC,
> <http://www.istic.ac.cn/Eng/brief_en.html>Beijing;
>
> Visiting Professor, Birkbeck <http://www.bbk.ac.uk/>, University of
> London;
>
> http:
Pedro C. Marijuan
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:34 PM
To: Terrence W. DEACON; 'fis'
Subject: Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture: Aftermath
Dear Terry and colleagues,
I hope you don't mind if I send some suggestions publicly. First, thank you for
the aftermath, it provides appropriat
Hi Guy,
Yes. At the very basic level that I explore with these ultra simple model
systems it would not be easy to distinguish perception and reaction. Both
involve interpretive steps, in that only some material
features—specifically those with potentially disruptive or constructive
potential for s
stantiate the necessary ontological complexity and
commitment.
Cheers,
Joseph
Message d'origine
De : dea...@berkeley.edu
Date : 24/04/2015 - 10:22 (PST)
À : pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Cc : fis@listas.unizar.es
Objet : Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture: Aftermath
Hi Pedro,
Indeed, you capture a
Hi Terry,
I have used the term ‘perception’ in referring to in-formation that affects
internal structure or dynamics. This would contrast with forms of potential
information that might pass through the system without being ‘perceived’. For
example, we have a finite number of mechanisms we cal
Hi Pedro,
Indeed, you capture a fundamental point of my work. I entirely agree with
your comment about living processes and their internal "informative"
organization. The three exceedingly simple molecular model systems (forms
of autogenesis) that I discuss toward the end of the paper were intende
Dear Terry and colleagues,
I hope you don't mind if I send some suggestions publicly. First, thank
you for the aftermath, it provides appropriate "closure" to a very
intense discussion session. Second, I think you have encapsulated very
clearly an essential point (at least in my opinion):
/"
Dear FIS colleagues,
Herewith the comments received from Terry several weeks ago. As I said
yesterday, the idea is to properly conclude that session, not to restart
the discussion. Of course, scholarly comments are always welcome, but
conclusively and not looking for argumentative rounds. Remember
Thanks Marcus, it is nice to greet to new, interesting parties joining
the list. The aftermath message was received some weeks ago --Terry's
agenda made him very difficult to continue the discussions of the New
Year Lecture, which on the other side was planned for no longer than 4
weeks or so.
Hi Pedro,
In this reprise of Deacon's(?) talk, I assume the discussion will
orient around the same paper Terry made available to the group earlier. If
a new version of that paper is to be considered, please let me know. I am
new to the FIS group and presently busy going over last January's not
Dear FIS Colleagues,
Following our recently established tradition, for the 2015 FIS New Year
Lecture we will count with:
*
_Terrence W. Deacon_*
Professor of Anthropology
Cognitive Science Faculty
University of California at Berkeley
He will impart the Lecture:
_*"Steps to a Theo
Dear Hans,
Thank you very much again for your lecture and your
subsequent comments and replies. I dare posting a new
comment as an aftermath to your wrap-up and to Pedro's
official closure. But I am sure you agree with me, that the
matter cannot be settled yet and that a continuation of the
disc
Dear Hans,
Dear colleagues,
Thanks a lot for the good, generous job done. It has been a pleasure
attending to your Lecture and to the discussion it has originated. There
are quite many reflections to make and to develop in the future. QBism
has general overtones, as was cogently explained, that
Caro Pedro e cari tutti,
questa e-mail dell'egregio Hans von Baeyer mi ha stimolato a segnalare,
ancora una volta, quanto sia stato anticipatore il mio pensiero
scientifico-economico sull'importanza della legge dell'informazione a
partire, ad es.,dagli inizi degli anni Ottanta. Sia chiaro, non rive
Dear Friends: In keeping with the message of my lecture, that knowledge of
the world is based on the ensemble of individual experiences, more than on
assumed objective, actual properties of an external reality, I will tell
you about my experiences of writing and discussing the New Year Lecture. I
e
Dear Hans and FIS colleagues,
Thanks for the elegant text! It marks a great beginning for the FIS tradition
of celebrating a Lecture with the New Year!
Not being very conversant with QM interpretations let me restrict myself to
general aspects of QBism that gra
At 02:55 AM 2014/01/03, Joseph Brenner wrote:
Happy New Year and
Goodwill to all FIS'ers and distinguished guests!
I found the concept of Quantum Bayesianism as presented by
Professor von Baeyer most interesting. From the point of view of bringing
the subject-object balance back into physics it
Best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Hans von Baeyer
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 9:25 PM
Subject: [Fis] New Year Lecture
Quantum Bayesianism (QBism): An interpretation of quantum mechanics based on
quantum information theory
*Quantum Bayesianism (QBism): An interpretation of quantum mechanics based
on quantum information theory*
Hans Christian von Baeyer, Professor of Physics, emeritus
College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia
January 2014
I am honored and proud to be asked by Pedro to inaug
33 matches
Mail list logo
