; Foundation of Information Science
Subject: Re: [Fis] The two very important operations of Infos
Dear Terry and colleagues,
(...) , there cannot be interminable regress of this displacement to establish
these norms. At some point normativity requires ontological grounding where the
o C. Marijuan
To: Loet Leydesdorff ; 'fis'
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] The two very important operations of Infos
Dear Loet and colleagues,
One of the advantages of a new discipline is the simplification of discourse,
the creation of a new spa
Dear Loet and colleagues,
One of the advantages of a new discipline is the simplification of
discourse, the creation of a new space where you can easily build new
knowledge without copious management of other unnecessary,
circumstantial ideas. I have already quoted in this list the famous
quo
Dear Terry and colleagues,
(...) , there cannot be interminable regress of this displacement to
establish these norms. At some point normativity requires ontological
grounding where the grounded normative relation is the preservation of
the systemic physical properties that produce the norm-pr
Dear Terrence,
Condsider the Russell paradox.
Russell set is R = { x a set | x is not a member of itself}.
If instead we define
R = { x a set | x is not a member of itself, and x is defined PRIOR TO THE
APPLICATION OF THIS DEFINITION}
then R is not a member of itself since it occurs AFTER the
Adding a temporal dimension has often been offered as a way out of paradox
in quasi-physical terms. This is because interpreting paradoxical logical
relations or calculating their values generally produces interminably
iterating self-contradicting or self-undermining results. Writers from G.
S. Bro
Dear Lou, Bruno, and FIS Colleagues,
Thank you for nice and polite comments to my post about “Barber paradox”.
First of all, the main idea of the post was not to solve any paradox but
to point two very important operations of Infos:
- Direct reflection;
- Transitive (indirect) reflection.
There a
