Dear Loet and All,
Your remark “what is communicated and why?” sounds suggestive in many
respects. If the question is paraphrased into “what is communicated by what?”,
the perennially perplexing issue of what is time would come up to the surface
once again since the temporality of
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 05.05.2011 14:36
An: fis@listas.unizar.es
Betreff: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language - John
Collier
Message from John Colier
Hi all
Message from John Colier
Hi all,
This is interesting, as it brings up some ancient issues that continue
to roil philosophy. I think that C.S. Peirce has the best answer to
these puzzles (and does not eliminate the wonder). For his (realist)
pragmatacism
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the particular. Kierkegaard
was not at all happy with this. What I am trying to say (quoting Octavio
Paz) is
Participants are reminded the rule of only two messages per week!!
---Pedro
Rafael Capurro escribió:
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the
(1951), may be required. I am looking forward
to the Taborsky opus to help develop this approach.
Best regards,
Joseph
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 05.05.2011 14:36
An: fis@listas.unizar.es
Betreff: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language
