Dear Emanuel,
It is good that you rise this question, as it is of common interest (and you
are sending it to the fis list).
MDPI journals have independent review process.
As an editor of a special issue, you can only invite papers that you would like
to have in your special issue.
Then MDPI
Dear Gordana,
I received your invitation letters (dated Nov. 5 and Nov. 1). However, I
think, I will not be able to accept your kind offer.
For the following reason: After the Vienna 2015 Summit, I was invited (by
MDPI Information journal) to submit an extended version of my conference
paper to
Loet, I have no disagreement with this. at least in the detailed summary
you give. In fact I would argue that the notion of information as used
in physics is empirically based just as it is in the cognitive sciences.
Our problem is to find what underlies both.
My mention of the Scholastics
Dear Krassimir and colleagues,
The Scientific Revolution of the 17th century was precisely about the
differentiation between scholarly discourse and scholastic disputatio. A
belief system is an attribute of agents and/or of a community. The
sciences, however, develop also as systems of
Dear Krassimir,
On 31 Oct 2017, at 15:07, Krassimir Markov wrote:
Dear FIS Colleagues,
Many years ago, in 2011, I had written a special remark about
scientific
and non-scientific approaches to try to understand the world around.
The
letter of Logan Streondj returns this theme as actual
