enior Research Associate
>
> Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
>
> http://web.ncf.ca/collier
>
>
>
> *From:* John Collier
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 28 March 2017 9:39 AM
> *To:* 'darvasg'
> *Subject:* RE: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange infor
John Collier
Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Associate
Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
http://web.ncf.ca/collier
From: John Collier
Sent: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 9:39 AM
To: 'darvasg'
Subject: RE: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”
I wrote this
On 24/03/17 18:24, Karl Javorszky wrote:
1) Let me second to the point Alex raises:
machines, computers, do exchange information. It would be against
cultural conventions to say that the notification that the
refrigerator sends to your phone's app "to-do-list" of the content
"milk only 0.5 li
gyuri, how can we get online or email access to your article on how
inanimate things exchange information?
with warmth and oomph--howard
ps i believe i'm in the volume for the information summit in vienna with
you. but if you get me a word or pdf version of your article, i can upload
it
Dear Krassimir,
They can
For details, see my contrinution to the 2015 Vienna IS4IS meeting and
following publications of the proceedings!
Best, Gyuri
24.03.2017 16:25 időpontban Krassimir Markov ezt írta:
> Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
> Let me remember that:
> The basic misunderst
1) Let me second to the point Alex raises:
machines, computers, do exchange information. It would be against cultural
conventions to say that the notification that the refrigerator sends to
your phone's app "to-do-list" of the content "milk only 0.5 liter
available" is not an information.
The sign
BUT, in common parlance, computers and mobile phones 'exchange information'
(in the abstract, digital sense) all the time. Including this email.
If you wish to cleanly restrict yourself to semantic content, the the form
of information that I presented to FiS a year ago offers the only
scientifical
24 mars 2017 kl. 16:25 skrev Krassimir Markov
mailto:mar...@foibg.com>>:
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
Let me remember that:
The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange
information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological
faults.
For instance, pho
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
Let me remember that:
The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange
information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological
faults.
For instance, photon could exchange only energy and/or reflections !
Sorry for this n-th m
