Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . MODERATION

2015-06-15 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear FIS Colleagues, Traditionally the fis list is a place where polite exchange and scholarly style of communication are maintained. We have been in place for almost 20 years, and very rarely we have had any personally disappointing message. Let us keep that way, please. At the time being I

Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Loss of Information

2015-06-15 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
e.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en> http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Joseph Brenner Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:11 PM To: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Loss of Information

Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Loss of Information

2015-06-15 Thread Joseph Brenner
Foundations of Information Science Information Science Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:28 AM Subject: Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Trust me. You are in good company. Steven On Jun 14, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote: From Loet's post:

Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . .

2015-06-14 Thread Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Trust me. You are in good company. Steven > On Jun 14, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From Loet's post: > >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our > >colleagues wish to ground information in physics.< > I would say that I was disap

Re: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . .

2015-06-14 Thread Jeremy Sherman
Amen. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote: > From Loet's post: > >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our > colleagues wish to ground information in physics.< > I would say that I was disappointed . . . > > For me this exchange on

[Fis] It from Bit redux . . .

2015-06-14 Thread Marcus Abundis
>From Loet's post: >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our colleagues wish to ground information in physics.< I would say that I was disappointed . . . For me this exchange on It from Bit is problematic as its seems to simply revisit the same problem introduced with S