Dear Jerry,
At the risk of being jailed by Pedro, let me point to the beauty of the example:
>From a molecular biological perspective, the assertion of “same encoding” of
>information is contrary to fact.
OK: the coding of the information is species specific; both theoretically and
e
rry
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:45 PM, Alex Hankey wrote:
>
> Pedro suggested that I send these comments to the whole group, so here they
> are
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Alex Hankey" mailto:alexhan...@gmail.com>>
> Date: 29 J
ph
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Loet Leydesdorff
> Date:29/06/2016 14:40 (GMT+01:00)
> To: "'Pedro C. Marijuan'" , fis@listas.unizar.es
> Subject: Re: [Fis] Shannonian Mechanics?
>
> Dear Pedro a
.
Original message From: Loet Leydesdorff
Date:29/06/2016 14:40 (GMT+01:00)
To: "'Pedro C. Marijuan'" ,
fis@listas.unizar.es Subject: Re: [Fis] Shannonian Mechanics?
Dear Pedro and colleagues,
The figure from Weaver in Loet's excellent posting leaves a few
Dear Pedro and colleagues,
The figure from Weaver in Loet's excellent posting leaves a few aspects
outside. The why, the what, the how long, the with whom, and other aspects
of the information phenomenon do not enter. By doing that we have
streamlined the phenomenon... and have left it ready f
Dear Marcus, Loet, Bob... and All,
Again very briefly, your exchanges make clear the limits of the received
Shannonian approach and the (narrow?) corridors left for advancement. I
find this situation highly reminiscent of what happened with Mechanics
long ago: an excellent theory (but of limit
