Re: [Fis] social flow

x. What has to > be added, *pace *Jakobson, is some notion of the actual dynamics of what > Roly calls "a mutual relateable framework". And let's not be too greedy: > let's get the pairwise interactions right and then see where we can go with > more complex ones. > &g

Re: [Fis] social flow

Dear Pedro Thank you! there is some sort of synchronicity here: I was just recently thinking about Roman Jakobson and his 6 levels of semiotic analysis. Especially the *phatic expression*, as some kind of white noise that is necessary for the interpersonal informational "handshake". That is, an in

Re: [Fis] The Communication Man

Dear Joseph I tried saying something like that in a conference and was confronted with someone who made it clear I have been scooped by the scientologists.. I was dissapointed and would love to reclaim it! Best Roly On M