t Rutgers University under the guidance
of B. Wilshire, attached).
All the best.
Sung
*From:* Fis on behalf of John Collier
*Sent:* Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:51 PM
*To:* fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* Re: [Fis]
lude it, without heavy qualification, in a discussion of the
>> foundations of information science.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>>
>>
>> Message d'origine
>> De : s...@pharmacy.rutgers.edu <mailto:s...@pharmacy.rutgers.edu>
>&
Dear John, Dear colleagues,
> On 25 Feb 2018, at 20:51, John Collier wrote:
>
> Daer Krassimir, List
>
> I basically support what you are saying. I understand the mathematics you
> presented, I am good at mathematics and studied logic with some of the best.
> However, and this is a big howeve
qualification, in a discussion of the foundations of information
science.
Thank you,
Joseph
Message d'origine
De : s...@pharmacy.rutgers.edu
Date : 25/02/2018 - 15:04 (PST)
À : ag...@ncf.ca, fis@listas.unizar.es
Obje
t Rutgers University under the guidance of B.
Wilshire, attached).
All the best.
Sung
From: Fis on behalf of John Collier
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:51 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] The shadows are real !!!
Daer Krassimir, List
I basically support what you are sa
Daer Krassimir, List
I basically support what you are saying. I understand the mathematics
you presented, I am good at mathematics and studied logic with some of
the best. However, and this is a big however, giving a mathematical or
logical proof by itself, in its formalism, does not show anyt
Dear Sung,
I like your approach but I think it is only a part of the whole.
1. The shadows are real but only a part of the whole. What is needed is a
systematic research from what they are part.
2. About the whole now I will use the category theory I have seen you like:
CATA => F => CATB => G
