But for fish it is not the case, because 'if' is the command as well.
It took some time for me to understand that I can do this in fish in the
following way:
cmd1 args1; and cmd2 args2
if and cmd3 args3
#some code
end
Cool. I hadn't though of doing it that way. What I
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:07:18PM -0700, ridiculous_fish wrote:
I view C++ like drinking from a beer bong: a little is nice, but if you don't
control yourself it's easy to swallow too much and wake up the following day
with a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor in
* Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase?
* Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish
the default feature branch of fish?
There hasn't been any official structure in who are considered maintainers.
People who've had code to commit and
2012/6/1 Maxim Gonchar gma...@gmail.com
But for fish it is not the case, because 'if' is the command as well.
It took some time for me to understand that I can do this in fish in the
following way:
cmd1 args1; and cmd2 args2
if and cmd3 args3
#some code
end
Cool. I
2012/6/1 ridiculous_fish corydo...@ridiculousfish.com
Hello Axel! I am honored to hear from you.
I must thank you for fish. It was (and still is) an inspiration for me,
both in
its technical design, and also its user-facing simplicity and elegance
relative
to its peers.
Aw man...
2012/6/1 Jan Kanis jan.c...@jankanis.nl
* Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase?
* Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish
the default feature branch of fish?
There hasn't been any official structure in who are considered
On 01/06/2012 22:54, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
I am dealing with a somewhat large and C++ code base at work right
now, written by extremely clever people who wanted to try out some
extremely clever ideas. Exceedingly fed up with C++ right now; a
conversation about the merits of C++ would not be
