2012/6/1 Jan Kanis <jan.c...@jankanis.nl>
>
> * Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase?
>> * Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish
>> the default feature branch of fish?
>>
>
> There hasn't been any official structure in who are considered
> maintainers. People who've had code to commit and requested it have access
> to the repository at gitorious.org/fish-shell, and most of them are on
> this list. The list of people with commit access is at
> http://gitorious.org/+fish-shell-developers/memberships
>
> I haven't had time yet to check out fishfish, but it's great to see the
> effort. Being one of the committers, I think it's great to make/merge it
> into the default branch.
>
Cool to see so many contributors.
>From my playing around with ridiculousfishfish, is seems like it has some
very cool new code in, but is still a bit rough around the edges. It is,
after all labeled as beta. One option might be to christen it the official
development branch of fish and then once it's stabilized make it into the
new master branch.
Biggest annoyance with that plan is that because of the c=>cpp renaming,
even trivial bug fix patches won't be possible to simply cherry pich from
one branch to the other, so shortening the stabilization period as much as
humanly possible would be highly advantageous in order to not split the
development effort.
Axel
>
> Jan
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
