I agree along the lines of Mark.
From a developer perspective, I'm always cautious of different flavors of
languages which require special compilers, or alternative languages and
compilers, like haxe. Several reasons:
1. What happens when you leave the project/company and the next developer
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Merrill, Jason
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
2. Time it can take to learn something like haxe doesn't seem to give you
enough ROI - at least my impression having looked at haxe as an alternative.
I have to disagree here -- learning haXe has definitely
The only thing that I would suggest, is that he tighten the compiler
code and perhaps expose low level features if it is possible to do so
just through an edit of the p code. It is still compiled into pcode
right? or am I out of date...
Merrill, Jason wrote:
I agree along the lines of Mark.
Take a look to the haXe compiler that is doing it already:
http://haxe.org/doc/features
Specially compiler features (conditional compilation, etc) and
language features (enums, etc).
Cheers!
Juan
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Weyert de Boer w...@innerfuse.biz wrote:
In Delphi and C# I
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Ian Thomas i...@eirias.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Manish Jethani
manish.jeth...@gmail.com wrote:
The first enhancement I can think of is a language extension called
'properties'.
private var _myProperty:int = 0;
public function get
You may want to look at the haxe language and compiler which already does what
you're trying to do and see if you can compete with that - or at least find out
what it does that you would like to do - this thread may be better suited for
the osflash list only because this is the kind of thing
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:27:06AM -0500, Merrill, Jason
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
You may want to look at the haxe language and compiler which already
does what you're trying to do and see if you can compete with that
haxe is a nifty project. But they're inventing their own
I think another compiler with a focus on more efficient bytecode would
be great, but those extra convenience features give me an uneasy
feeling (embrace and extend has caused too many problems already).
So, my feature request would be an export functionality to remove all
those extra features
you can already do trailing comma's cant you? I know you can in arrays.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Matthias Kramm kr...@quiss.org wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently in the process of writing a compiler for
ActionScript 3.0.
(In case you're interested, the development snapshot at
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Matthias Kramm kr...@quiss.org wrote:
I'm currently in the process of writing a compiler for
ActionScript 3.0.
(In case you're interested, the development snapshot at
http://www.swftools.org/download.html already contains
a pre-alpha command-line tool,
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Manish Jethani
manish.jeth...@gmail.com wrote:
The first enhancement I can think of is a language extension called
'properties'.
private var _myProperty:int = 0;
public function get myProperty():int
{
return _myProperty;
}
public
Dunno if you're going to implement [Bindable], which is I guess part of
Flex, but if you do...
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14475 and
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-9804
describe the fact that we can't use data-binding to watch the changes of
read-only properties. This ability
In Delphi and C# I used it to get RTTI information.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
13 matches
Mail list logo
