Hi guys,
This is always really hard to find information about, so I wanted to
ask the list.
Which events do AS2 components automatically have? I'm not talking
about V2 components, I'm referring to components created from scratch
in AS2. For example, there are functions like "onResize", which seem
This line:
_root.Test.loadMovie("clip.swf", _root);
Should either be:
Test.loadMovie("clip.swf");
or
loadMovie("clip.swf", Test);
(and drop the use of "_root" gollygoshdarnnit!)
You have instead combined both methods. By stating the movieClip name first
and then LoadMovie, the second param
I am still puzzled about that thing ... (unbalanced results on PC vs
MAC)
...
I notice between lines 29 & 33 of your convolution version
you have pushed a blurFilter into the filterArray
It's blurring the individual item - the second time around blurs the
entire canvas.
This still means
B
should i use netstream or media class component? and why?
i'm just trying to figure out whats the mainly differences between both.
cheers
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashco
Well, a couple of reasons. I mean you can, it's possible, but the reason for
container clips is so you have the ability to load more than one clip. If you
load into _root, everything in that movie clip will be replaced by the new clip
you are loading in, and if you try and load a second clip in
Hi to all
i have to recover a .swf from a .src
is there any tool to do this infamous job?
thanks in advance
Alfonso Florio
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Hey Jason,
Thanks for your reply. Sorry, it was just a typo mistake ("C:\\
pages.swf"). I just want to know problems of loading the SWF file on
root movie. Creating a new movie clip and loading that SWF file in that
will solve the purpose but it is not clearing my doubt.
Let me explore thi
> I notice between lines 29 & 33 of your convolution version
> you have pushed a blurFilter into the filterArray
It's blurring the individual item - the second time around blurs the
entire canvas.
This still means
Blur + blur = slow on Pc/ fast on mac
blur + convo slow on mac/fast on PC
-
>>Use "C: pages.swf"
...and remove the space in there as well...
Jason Merrill
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank
>>Pepermans
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:18 AM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: RE: [Fl
Same deal here Tom. I really need that documentation available.
Can anybody from Adobe comment on this issue please?
Cheers,
Mischa
On 1/30/06, Tom Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a mirror for this somewhere? I was depending on this for a
> proof-of-concept I'm working on.
>
> Broke
I notice between lines 29 & 33 of your convolution version you have
pushed a blurFilter into the filterArray - if you remove this from
both versions and rely on convolution purely for blurring, as you can
observe the effect isn't as pronounced as directly applying a
blurFilter - to get an effective
Use "C: pages.swf" since "\" is used to escape characters
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 31 januari 2006 12:00
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] LoadMovie Problem?
You also have a spa
I definitely get better performance out of Convo rather than Blur in both
Firefox and IE on Win XP.
Cheers,
Ian
On 1/31/06, franto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in your performance test in Firefox, all seems same for me, little bit
> blur has slower
>
> but CPU usage on blur: 38-40 %
> on conv
Lieven,
No problems. Masking things out with a clip might feel a bit like
cheating, but I'm all for 'do the simplest thing that works...'
Cheers,
Ian
On 1/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep, Ian, I'v been programming Flash now for a year, and didn't know
> there was a
You also have a space in there:
"C:\\ pages.swf"
I would not recommend loading from c: -you can't guarantee the file will
always be there can you? Loal from a relative url instead, and don't try and
load into _root - create and empty movie clip instance, and load into that.
Jason Merrill
and blur shaky ??
in regards to Safari, I get the same results than with Flash IDE
my co-worker, who has Pentium M 1.86 1 Gig Ram, cannot see a
difference between both :-)
I am lost...
in IE convo is still faster - not got firefox at work so can't test.
-Original Message-
Yep, Ian, I'v been programming Flash now for a year, and didn't know
there was a useHandCursor to be set false... Thank you for enlightening
me...
cheers
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Lieven Cardoen
MULTIMEDIALOFT | POINT X
Engelse Wandeling 2 K18v | 8500 Kortrijk | T +32 (0)56/36.11.97
// communica
in IE convo is still faster - not got firefox at work so can't test.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of franto
> Sent: 31 January 2006 10:35
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance
>
>
in your performance test in Firefox, all seems same for me, little bit
blur has slower
but CPU usage on blur: 38-40 %
on convo: 34 - 38%
my previous tests was in Flash IDE
On 1/31/06, Cédric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I don't have time to write a small 'performance' reporter
Why will they think there's something to be clicked?
Set .useHandCursor to false on the blocking clip?
Cheers,
Ian
On 1/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know, but then users will still think there's something to be
> clicked...
>
> Isn't there a way to access the movie
I know, but then users will still think there's something to be
clicked...
Isn't there a way to access the movieclips for each rows in where the
click's are processed...
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Lieven Cardoen
MULTIMEDIALOFT | POINT X
Engelse Wandeling 2 K18v | 8500 Kortrijk | T +32 (0)56/36.11.
Sorry, I meant 0% alpha, of course. :-)
Ian
On 1/31/06, Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Place another movieclip over the top of it, 100% alpha, with onRelease set
> to a dummy function?
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figl
Place another movieclip over the top of it, 100% alpha, with onRelease set
to a dummy function?
On 1/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a tree and to Buttons to navigate to tree (up and down).
>
> Now I need to make the tree not clickable. A user may only navigate with
I have a tree and to Buttons to navigate to tree (up and down).
Now I need to make the tree not clickable. A user may only navigate with
the buttons.
Disabling the change event is not an option, neither is disabling the
tree.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Lieven Cardoen
MULTIMEDIALOFT | POINT
Actually, I don't have time to write a small 'performance' reporter
but I did upload the files so most of us can see them live ...
WHAT IS IT ??? pure crazyness
http://www.benga.li/performance/
Cedric
my mails seem to fall before getting to the list...
I am on OS X 10.4.4 using Fl
Hi,
Please tell me, what is the main problem with loading the movie
on root?
I tried another solution i.e. loading in some other movie which is
working fine but I don't know the reason. :(
Please clear my doubts.
DJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
my mails seem to fall before getting to the list...
I am on OS X 10.4.4 using Flash 8 on a G5 dualcore 2*2ghz
ouch
WHAT IS THAT ?
we are in a bad shape ;)
and macromedia is the only one to shed some light on 'hardware
acceleration'
is it ??
cedric
uff, Cedric, i got opposite result
Looks like:
Convolution = better on PC
Blur = better on mac
Oh joy
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Cédric Muller
> Sent: 31 January 2006 09:44
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter pe
Flash 8, WinXP... maybe it's because of hardware support on MAC?
On 1/31/06, Cédric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Flash 8 on OS X 10.4
>
> ?? really strange ...
>
>
> > much better with Convolution filter :)
> >
> > On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OK you'
this is complete nonsesnse, take a look to the manual,
first, not sure if loadMovie to _root is proper solution,
create new movieClip, and load to it
and most important: you have to wait for the movie being loaded, which is
the hardCore and basic knowledge for every flash programmer :-)
good l
uff, Cedric, i got opposite results
blurFilter=shaky and unstable
convultionFilter=svery smooth
can anybody tell me why?
On 1/31/06, Cédric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ???
> blurFilter=very smooth
> convultionFilter=shaky and unstable
>
>
>
> > much better with Convolution filter :
Interesting, it runs like a dog with blur filter on mine, fast and sweet as pie
(a bit 'shaky' but not enough to be a problem) with convolution on my PC.
You PC or Mac?
M
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Cédric Muller
> Sent: 31
I am using Flash 8 on OS X 10.4
?? really strange ...
much better with Convolution filter :)
On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK you'll need a movie 768x768 - copy this code on to frame 1 etc.
with blur filter:
[/as]
import flash.filters.*;
import flash.geom.*;
import f
???
blurFilter=very smooth
convultionFilter=shaky and unstable
much better with Convolution filter :)
On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK you'll need a movie 768x768 - copy this code on to frame 1 etc.
with blur filter:
[/as]
import flash.filters.*;
import flash.geo
much better with Convolution filter :)
On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK you'll need a movie 768x768 - copy this code on to frame 1 etc.
>
> with blur filter:
>
> [/as]
> import flash.filters.*;
> import flash.geom.*;
> import flash.display.*;
> //
> //import flash.display.
OK you'll need a movie 768x768 - copy this code on to frame 1 etc.
with blur filter:
[/as]
import flash.filters.*;
import flash.geom.*;
import flash.display.*;
//
//import flash.display.Bitmap;
var width:Number = 768;
var height:Number = 768;
var offScreen1:BitmapData = new BitmapData(width, heig
Nevermind, I found it. It's radioButtonGroupName.selection.
Dimitrios
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:41 PM
Subject: [FlashCoders] RadioButton group
Hello all,
Sorry for bothering you with this very basic que
Nathan Derksen wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response, it's been a busy day.
Not a problem at all.
I hope this helps.
That looks great, an improvement over what I've already done, but it wont
require a full rewrite. Thanks a lot.
___
Flashcoders
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
