I disagree, Arp and Cairngorm are architectural frameworks. Flex is an
application framework. From what I understand Rails is primarily an
application framework with some architectural elements as well. So I
would say...
Rails is to Ruby as Flex ( + optinally Arp or Caringorm) is to Flash.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ujjwal
Kabra
Sent: donderdag 20 juli 2006 22:02
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
After nearly two years of working in ActionScript, my company decided
that Flash development was too
Another issue with developing a Rails or Cake type of framework for
Flash is the rate at which Flash changes undermines the effort.
PHP, Java, Ruby - these languages get upgrades, improvements and bug
fixes over the years, but for the most part, don't change that much, and
get a lot of additional
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ujjwal
Kabra
Sent: donderdag 20 juli 2006 22:02
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
After nearly two years of working in ActionScript, my company decided
that Flash development wa
and where does your company decided to move for ?
2006/7/20, Ujjwal Kabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
After nearly two years of working in ActionScript, my company decided that
Flash development was too painful and just not worth the effort.
This happened just about the time that I was actually gett
After nearly two years of working in ActionScript, my company decided that
Flash development was too painful and just not worth the effort.
This happened just about the time that I was actually getting the hang of
things. In any case, I was the last Flash(AS2) Developer left here...
I'm in full
James,
Rails and Flex work very well together. Maybe you should consider
following that career path - a Flex/Rails developer. Jesse Warden has
gone that way and loves it.
http://www.recentrambles.com/pragmatic/view/31
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
_
> I see. I will have a good look at haXe as well. I like the idea but am a bit
> worried about the amount of time I would have to invest to gain enough
> understanding to build an application. How long would you imagin it might
> take to for me to get started?
Very quickly, especially if you have
I see. I will have a good look at haXe as well. I like the idea but am a bit
worried about the amount of time I would have to invest to gain enough
understanding to build an application. How long would you imagin it might
take to for me to get started?
On 7/20/06, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECT
> Have you ever built anything in haXe? If so how did you find the experience?
Disclaimer : I'm the haXe author
I have been building several websites and flash games with haXe and its
predecessor (our in-house language MotionTypes). The less I can say is
that using it has been tremendously boosti
Have you ever built anything in haXe? If so how did you find the experience?
On 7/20/06, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking at ARP and Carngorm at the moment and they are not proving
easy
> to use and I am a highly experienced AS developer.
>
> I have also started lookin
> I am looking at ARP and Carngorm at the moment and they are not proving easy
> to use and I am a highly experienced AS developer.
>
> I have also started looking at Flex. . .
Did you have a look at haXe ?
http://haxe.org
It has builtin remoting for communicating with Flash. The idea is that
yo
I started this thread for a simple reason, love or loath Ruby what has been
developed here has enabled several of my clients to deploy excellent web
applications with a significantly reduced investment of time with no aparent
compromise on functionality.
I think thats great. I wish the same could
As it ends up, his comments were fueled solely by his dislike for Ruby's
syntax, which has nothing to do with whether or not Ruby on Rails is
deserving of the attention and praise it is getting.
I don't see why my dislike of Ruby's syntax has anything to do with
this. I won't bother explai
> I think that says more about the average Director developer than about
> Flash or Macromedia. ;-)
Heh, I was joking to make a point. I don't think anyone can claim to
know the future and label new technologies as "just hype", especially
not having delved into them personally to weigh the benefi
At one time, Director developers were saying Flash was just hype.
Macromedia just had great marketing but their product wasn't very good.
Flash sucks. :P
I think that says more about the average Director developer than about
Flash or Macromedia. ;-)
ryanm
___
> http://blogs.borland.com/fhaglund/archive/2006/07/15/25963.aspx ;-)
And yet at the end of said article
"There might be easy ways get this to work in Rails but I'm a Rails
rookie and I have not found it yet. Can someone with deeper knowledge
enlighten me?"
What we have here is a programmer erro
I just don't like Ruby it's my main problem with it. Syntax is ugly in
my opinion.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you
How you like them apples? :)
Unfortunately, there is no baked in configuration for peach cobbler,
blackberry pie, and apricot fried pies, and since my clients aren't
interested in plain old apple pie, ROR is mostly useless for me. ;-)
ryanm
_
Steven Sacks | BLITZ schrieb:
At one time, Director developers were saying Flash was just hype.
Macromedia just had great marketing but their product wasn't very good.
Flash sucks. :P
wtf is director ?
micha
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To
>> Well, Ruby on Rails is just a hype. Their are some issues with it
>> which cause database corruption.
> Oh really? Do tell.
The reason I ask is because I don't think you can blame Rails for
something that's a programmer issue. That's like blaming Flash for bugs
in people's Flash apps.
On t
> Well, Ruby on Rails is just a hype. Their are some issues with it
which
> cause database corruption.
Oh really? Do tell.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mail
Well, Ruby on Rails is just a hype. Their are some issues with it which
cause database corruption.
Yours,
Weyert
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listi
> Rails is to Ruby what ARP and Cairngorm are to Actionscript.
You can't just say "Framework is to Language as Framework is to
Language". The Rails approach is different and, in many people's
opinions, better. There's a reason there is more buzz surrounding Ruby
on Rails than frameworks like Cake,
Merrill, Jason wrote:
That's why I was thinking about Flex sooner then something like ARP.
Yeah, ARP documentation isn't really that clear. Also you can't really
print it out well. Main problem.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To cha
>>That's why I was thinking about Flex sooner then something like ARP.
It's not really a question of Flex vs. ARP from what I understand of ARP
as it's more of a development methodology and structural framework that
supports Actionscript, but also supports Flex. But starting out,
regardless of th
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
Salisbury
Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2006 13:41
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
Ruby, is a (slick) programming language
Rails is an application framework...
f I'm wrong plz :)
Grt, Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Weekes
Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2006 10:21
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
no problemo.
In ca
r then let's say Ruby and ARP.
Correct me if I'm wrong plz :)
Grt, Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Weekes
Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2006 10:21
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ActionScrip
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Weekes
Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2006 10:21
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
no problemo.
In case nobody has posted the links:
http://www.osflash.org/arp
And
http://labs.adobe.com/wi
mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
Sorry Nick I was simply unaware of them. Now that I am I will be trying them
out.
On 7/19/06, Nick Weekes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There still hasn't been a decent reason in this thread why the
>
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Smeets
Sent: 19 July 2006 08:43
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
I like the idea, and think a lot of people are trying it with you. But
wouldn't this result i
t: RE: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
I like the idea, and think a lot of people are trying it with you. But
wouldn't this result in something like...Flex?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Deakin
Sent: dinsdag 18
Thanks to all of you for your comments. Dispite googling for just this sort
of thing I had never come accross ARP or Cairngorm. I shall take a good long
look at both . I have literally just installed Flex builder 2 and will be
expermeting with that as well.
If any of these things save me as much
f.com; flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] ActionScript Application Framework
Dear List (I should say lists this going to Flash and Flex coders),
I am a very and I mean very experienced ActionScript coder. I have been
writng code and storing it for re-use for 7 years. I have just inst
One of my fav's
On 7/18/06 1:26 PM, "Steven Sacks | BLITZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Pragmatic Programmer
> http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ppbook/index.shtml
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or sear
Sure, here's the first step. Buy and read the following books:
Agile Web Development with Rails - 2nd Edition
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/rails/index.html
This will give you a solid foundation on why Rails is such an
outstanding framework.
Practices of an Agile Developer
http://ww
To me (at least to some extent), Flex is to Flash what Rails is to
Ruby. And of course you have Cairngorm or ARP for structural framework.
-Steve
Dear List (I should say lists this going to Flash and Flex coders),
I am
Have you tried using ARP, the RIA Framework by Aral Balkan?
Cheers,
James
> Dear List (I should say lists this going to Flash and Flex coders),
>
> I am a very and I mean very experienced ActionScript coder. I have been
> writng code and storing it for re-use for 7 years. I have just installe
oders] ActionScript Application Framework
We definitely can do this, but it may amount to reinventing the wheel.
Do you suggest this in lieu of Cairngorm and ARP? Are there things about
these frameworks that make them undesirable?
Mike
___
Flashc
We definitely can do this, but it may amount to reinventing the wheel.
Do you suggest this in lieu of Cairngorm and ARP? Are there things about
these frameworks that make them undesirable?
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subs
Dear List (I should say lists this going to Flash and Flex coders),
I am a very and I mean very experienced ActionScript coder. I have been
writng code and storing it for re-use for 7 years. I have just installed
Rails an application frame work for a language named Ruby which enabled me
to create
42 matches
Mail list logo